Institutional changes in the earth market of Southern regions

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 11 (no. 4.3),
p. 163-168

Based on the monitoring of the land market in southern Russia there was revealed peculiarities of its subject structure, identified the direction of change in the ratio of various categories of agricultural land. It allowed to include in number of the reasons of the land conflicts emergence in North Caucasus federal district special modes of granting lands and to characterize the developed institutional trap concerning the unclaimed lands, determined by discrepancy of the various formal institutes regulating a land turn.

Keywords: land market; subjects; object; land bargains; security of lands; peculiarities; regimes; land conflict

  • Alisultanov A. (2011). Land conflicts escalate into political inaction and aggravated officials. Available at: http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/197969/. (In Russian.)
  • Amosov A.A. (2008). Development Strategy of the agrarian sector. Economists, no. 9. (In Russian.)
  • Arthur W.B. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 394.
  • Belokrylova O.S. (2012). Features of economic development the agrarian sphere in Russia in terms of membership in the WTO. Economy of Russia and Europe in the era of globalization. Economic development, governance mechanisms and information in the EU. Rostov-on-Don: SFU. (In Russian.)
  • Grigoriev Yu.G. (2005). Balkan and Caucasus conflict arc: “intersection of parallels” (sociological and historical approach to the analysis of ethnic conflict). Program II All-Russian Conference “Sorokin reading” – “The Future of Russia: Development Strategies.” Available at: http://www.socio.msu.ru/?s=science&p=sorokin_2005_6. (In Russian.)
  • Honore A.M. (1961). Ownership. In Oxford essays in jurisprundence. Ed. by Guest A.W. Oxford.
  • Koroljuk E.A. (2011). Formation of economic contradictions of modern land market growth as institutional and economic system. Krasnodar: Univ. Krasnodar Cooperative Institute. (In Russian.)
  • Regional report on the status and use of land for KCR 2012. Vladikavkaz, 2012. (In Russian.)
  • Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators (2012). Rosstat. Moscow. 2012. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156. (In Russian.)
  • Report on the status and use of agricultural lands (2012). Moscow. Available at: http://www.agroxxi.ru/zakonodatelstvo/doklad-o-sostojanii-i-ispolzovanii-zemel-selskohozjaistvennogo-naznachenija.html. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. 2013, ch. 3, st. 1151. Guarant. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/10164072. (In Russian.)
  • RF Government Decree of April 23, 2013 no. 656-r “On approval of the distribution in 2013 of subsidies from the federal budget to the budgets of the Russian Federation for reimbursement of expenses KFH, including SP when placing the ownership of land use from agricultural lands. Guarant. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/10164072/64. (In Russian.)
  • The concept of agribusiness development Rostov region until 2020 (2012). Available at: www.don-agro.ru/. (In Russian.)
  • Volchik V.V. (2004). Evolutionary Paradigm and institutional transformation of the economy. Rostov-on-Don. (In Russian.)
  • Yale J. (2002). Turnover of farmland – who opposed? Peasant – cal statements. June 10. Available at: http://www.agronews.ru/articles/detail/7827/. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606