SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

Political economy’s paradigms in methodology of postmodern discourse

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 11 (no. 4.3),
p. 89-93

Authors state doubts in need of any new paradigms of political economy for understanding of problems of a modern economic crisis, believe that the dominating liberal and monetaristic paradigm in the world of modern capitalism quite explains with the absolutization the philosophical nature of its system crisis: imbalance of real and virtual economy, up to their gap. Authors also consider that purely economic discourse of a world economic crisis is insufficient for study of strategy of development of «post-capitalist» capitalism of an era of a postmodern and globalization, offer as a theoretical basis of such strategy, along with a «normal» liberal and monetaristic paradigm, pluralism of «speculative» paradigms, but «funded» not only by market fundamentalism, but also by the social-cultured «metaparadigm» proving in the spirit of a postmodern the modern relationship between paradigms of the economic theory and their application in political economy


Keywords: political economy; economic; crisis; capitalism; postmodernism; paradigm

References:
  • Ananyev O.I. (2000).Institutionals structures and institutional dynamic of economical theory. M.: Academlit. (In Russian.)
  • Galbraith J.K. (1976).Economics and the Public Purpose. M.: Progress. (In Russian.)
  • Hayek F. (1992).The Road to serfdom. M.: Economy. (In Russian.)
  • Husserl E. (1992). The Crisis of European sciences and transzedentale Phanomenologie. Voprosy philosophii, vol. 7, pp. 136–176. (In Russian.)
  • Jameson F. (1992). Postmodernism or Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (In Russian.)
  • Klein L.R. Globalization: challenge to national economics. Available at: http://www.ptpu.ru/issues/6_98/7_6_98.htm. (In Russian.)
  • Kuhn T.S. (1975).The structure of scientific revolutions. M.: Progress. (In Russian.)
  • Lаkatos I. (1978).The history of science and it rational reconstruction. M.: Progress. (In Russian.)
  • Lukacs D. (1991). To the ontology of social existence. Prolegomens. M.: Progress. (In Russian.)
  • Mamedov O.Yu. (2013). European liberalism and Russian Economy-drama of unrequited love? TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 6–11. (In Russian.)
  • Mises L. von (2007). Liberalism. Chelyabinsk. Sotsium. (In Russia.)
  • What is Liberalism.com. Economic Liberalism. What is Liberalism.com. Available at: http://whatisliberalism.com/?pageId=79119.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606