The modern corporation in the coordinates of classical political economy

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 11 (no. 4.3),
p. 5-9

This article is the result of the dialog between professor Oktay Mamedov and doctor Olga Brizhak. The central problem of this dialog is modern vision of the potential and perspectives of utilization of classic political economy paradigm for the analysis of the nature of corporation and its role in the XXI century economy. Authors also put their attention at the specific features of Russian intercorporative relations.

Keywords: classic political economy; corporation; social responsibility; innovations

  • Brizhak O.V. (2012a). Interests of the intra-corporate relations: the problem of income distribution in the Russian context. Bulletin of the Volga. Series 3 “Economy. Ecology”, no. 2(21), pp. 152–157. (In Russian.)
  • Brizhak O.V. (2012b). Owners and managers: contradictions and institutional impact on the innovative development corporations. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 10. № 2–2, pp. 32–34. (In Russian.)
  • Brizhak O.V., Suanova Z.S. (2012). Corporation: a comparative analysis of the basic concepts. Herald SOGU named after K.L. Khetagurov, no. 4, pp. 294–299. (In Russian.)
  • Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2005). The post-Soviet Marxism in Russia: Meeting the Challenges of the XXI century (theses to the formation of a scientific school ). Moscow. LENAND. (In Russian.)
  • Friedman M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times magazine.
  • Mamedov O.U. (2013a). The Future of Political Economy: Beyond the pseudo pragmatics and false theory. Political Economy: Social the priorities. Vol. 1: From crisis to socially-oriented development: the political economy reactualization. Under total. ed. A.V. Buzgalin, M.I. Voeikov, O.U. Mamedov, V.T. Ryazanov. Moscow. LENAND. (In Russian.)
  • Mamedov O.U. (2013b). Two periods (from the dictatorship of political economy – to the dictatorship of economic policy). TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4–8. (In Russian.)
  • Mamedov O.U. (2008). Unbearable heaviness of small business. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 5–8. (In Russian.)
  • Marx K., Engels F. (1965). Works. Moscow. Politizdat. (In Russian.)
  • Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, december, pp. 78–92.
  • Ricardo D. (1995). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Moscow. Knowledge, vol. 1. (In Russian.)
  • Robinson J.W. (1962). Economic Philosophy: Essay on the Development of Economic Thought (Economic Philosophy: An essay on the progress of economic thought). (In Russian.)
  • Smith A. (2007). Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Moscow. Eksmo. (Series: An Anthology of economic thought ). (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606