SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2013
  • No 3.2
  • Development of the theory of special interest groups in economic science: historical and genetic context

Development of the theory of special interest groups in economic science: historical and genetic context

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 11 (no. 3.2),
p. 22-27

The article is devoted to the problems of interaction between economic actors in their clustering on the basis of special economic interests , as well as the influence of these groups on the formation of the modern economic reality. The article focuses on the historical development of the genetic concepts of special interest groups within the sociological and political theories and modern institutional and economic views of domestic and foreign economists. The conclusions of the determining role of special interest groups in influencing the pattern of economic development and the structuring of inter-subject conditioning agent relationships in the modern economic system.


Keywords: group of special interests; economic interests; collective action; social dilemmas; the public good; «the effect of free-riding»

References:
  • Andreeva M. (1994). Social psychology. M: AST-Press. (In Russian.)
  • Bentley A. (2012). The Process of government. Study of social pressures. M: Pen. (In Russian.)
  • Berezhnoy I.V., Volchik V.V. (2007). Interest groups and the quality of economic institutions // TERRA ECONOMICUS, V.5, no2, p.57–66. (In Russian.)
  • Commons J. (1990). Institutional economics its place in political economy. News Brunswick (NJ) USA: Transaction Publishers, p. 7.
  • Dawes R.M. (2000). Social Dilemmas // International journal of psychology, 35 (2), 111–116.
  • Hobbes T. (1991). Essays: In 2 parts. Vol. 2. M: Thought, p. 174. (In Russian.)
  • Inshakov O.V., Frolov D.P. (2002). Institutionalism in the Russian economic thought (IX-XXI century): In 2 parts – Volgograd: VolSU publishing, Vol. 1. (In Russian.)
  • Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional worlds: the Nobel prize for Economics – 2009 (Part 1). M: MSU-HSE. P. 9. (In Russian.)
  • Levin K. (2000). Resolution of social conflicts. SPb.: The speech. (In Russian.)
  • Majburd E. (2012). Economy of collective action // Seven arts. № 9. Electronic journal. Available at: http://www.7iskusstv.com/. Date of accessed: 4.10.13. (In Russian.)
  • Merton R.K. (1992). Social theory and social structure // Sociological studies, № 2–4, p. 118. (In Russian.)
  • Mills T.M. (1972). About the sociology of small groups // sociology. Prospects. The problems. Methods: Per. from English. (In Russian.)
  • Olson M. (1995). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. M., p. 32. (In Russian.)
  • Ostrom E. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action // American Political Science Review. Vol. 92. № 1, р. 1.
  • Ostrom E. (2000). Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 14, р. 137–158.
  • Tambovtsev V., Verveda A. (2008). Subjects of modernization: the influence of interests groups on development strategies // Economic questions № 1, p. 88–96. (In Russian.)
  • Truman D. (2006). The process of government: political interests and public opinion // Theory and practice of democracy. Selected texts. M, p. 309, 315. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606