Alexander A. Ermolenko
Doct. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Southern Institute of Management

Olga V. Brizhak
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Kuban State Technological University

TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2017, Vol. 15 (no. 3),

p. 92-105
DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-3-92-105

At the present stage the interweaving of a variety of complex and multidirectional transformation processes creates specific conditions for economic development, forming a different kind of problem nodes in the study who demand new ideas, interdisciplinary opportunities, as well as the results of the reconsideration of the previously established concepts. In this respect interest is the concept of conformity that occurred in the 30th–40th years of the twentieth century. Her cognitive ability has been successfully tested on different research areas (psychology, biology, sociology, etc.), positively manifested itself in a number of interdisciplinary research. Rethinking existing ideas about the conformity and the application of the relevant results is important for the Russian economic science, in particular in the direction of analysis of the key issues that emerged at the crossroads of several transformation processes. The authors substantiate the legitimacy, relevance and necessity of using methodological tools concept of conformism, meaningful as applied to modern stage of economic development, the system analysis results of the economic transformations related to modern integrated forms: large corporations, territorial economic formations, etc. Wide application of this tool can lead to interesting results in terms of development of the productive sphere of the Russian economy development in conditions of external constraints, as well as in terms of enrichment of the methodological and theoretical Arsenal of economic science. The authors focus on the interdisciplinary nature of the alleged scientific problems because of its design popular features formed on various areas of scientific 94 А.А. ЕРМОЛЕНКО, О.В. БРИЖАК ТЕRRА ECONOMICUS  2017 Том 15 № 3 КОНЦЕПТ КОНФОРМИЗМА: НОВЫЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ В ИССЛЕДОВАНИИ... 95 research: analysis of the Genesis of the phenomenon and relationships between the various stages of its development, personalization of relations in the economic system, analysis of the results of the development impact of system factors that have a different nature while maintaining the conceptual integrity of the study, a productive combination of various scientific approaches, the cultivation of new institutions. The authors strive for an adequate assessment of potential adaptation to a set of transformation processes, which have systemic economic actors involved in these processes.

Keywords: conformity; transformation of economic relations; methodology; adaptation; unevenness

References:

• Andersen, G. (2016). The new dress of the king. Moscow: Publ. House Azbuka, 48 p. (In Russian.)
• Arrighi, J. (2006). Long twentieth century: Money, power and the origins of our time. Moscow: Publ. House Territory of the Future, 472 p. (In Russian.)
• Braudel, F. (2006a). Material civilization, economics and capitalism, XV–XVIII centuries, 1. The structure of everyday life: the possible and the impossible. Moscow: Ves mir Publ., 592 p. (In Russian.)
• Braudel, F. (2006b). Material civilization, economics and capitalism, XV–XVIII centuries, 2. Games of exchange. Moscow: Ves mir Publ., 672 p. (In Russian.)
• Braudel, F. (2006c). Material civilization, economics and capitalism, XV–XVIII centuries, 3. The time of peace. Moscow: Ves mir Publ., 752 p. (In Russian).
• Brizhak, O. V. (2014). Institutional transformation of the Russian economy: contradictions in the corporate sector. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 9, 69–77. (In Russian.)
• Buzgalin, A. V., and Kolganov, A. I. (2015). Global Сapital, in 2 vols. Moscow: LENAND Publ., 912 p. (In Russian.)
• Coleman, J. (2001). Capital is social and human. Social sciences and the present, 3, 121– 139 (In Russian.)
• Florida, R. (2006). The Rise of the Creative Class. NY: Basic Books.
• Foster, J. (1987). Evolutionary Macroeconomics. London, 244 p.
• Fromm, E. (1990). Flight from freedom. Moscow: Progress Publ., 272 p. (In Russian.)
• Garforth, L., and Kerr, A. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the social sciences: capital, institutions and autonomy. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(4), 657–676, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01385.x.
• Glazyev, S. Yu. (2013). On the policy of advanced development in the conditions of changing technological structures. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 1, 29–35. (In Russian.)
• Glazyev, S. Yu. (2015). Formation of a new institutional system in the conditions of changing dominant technological structures. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 190(1), 37–45. (In Russian.)
• Hayek, F. (2012). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 280 p.
• Hilferding, R. (2011). Financial capital. The newest phase in the development of capitalism. Moscow: URSS Publishing House, 480 p. (In Russian.)
• Inshakov, O. V. (Ed.) (2005). Homo institutius – Institutional person. Volgograd: Publ. House of the Volgograd State University, 854 p. (In Russian.)
• Krugman, P. (2017). On Economic Arrogance. The New York Times, February 20.
• Krugman, P. R. (2005). Wells R. Economics. Worth Publishers, 1200 p.
• Leibenstein, H. (1976). Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Microeconomics. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press, 297 p.
• Lukács, D. (1991). On the ontology of social being. Prolegomena. Moscow: Progress Publ., 417 p. (In Russian).
• Mamedov, O. Y. (2016). And on the «needle» you can sit with comfort (the experience of economic journalism). Issues of political economy, 4, 117–125. (In Russian.)
• Mamedov, O., Movchan, I., Ishchenko-Padukova, O., and Grabowska, M. (2016). Traditional economy: innovations, efficiency and globalization. Economics & Sociology, 9(2), 61–72.
• Mises, L. (1966). Human Action: a Treatise on Economics. Chicago: Contemporary Books Inc., 256 p.
• Moravia, A. (2004). Conformist. Moscow: Limbus-Press Publ., 336 p. (In Russian.)
• Nureyev, R. M. (2016). From old industrialization to new. The economic revival of Russia, 2, 38–44. (In Russian.) Nureyev, R. M., and Latov, Yu. V. (2015). Post-Soviet institutional development: in search of a way out of the rut of power-ownership. The world of Russia: Sociology, Ethnology, 24(2), 50–88. (In Russian.)
• Pigou, A. C. (1927). Industrial Fluctuations. London: Macmillan.
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts London.
• Sartre, J.-P. (1957). L, etre et neant. Paris.
• Sartre, J.-P. (1960). Critique de la Raison dialectique. Paris, 761 p.
• Sartre, J.-P. (1996). Existentialism and humanism. The continental philosophy reader. London; New York: Routledge.
• Sartre, J.-P. (2016). Nausea. Moscow: AST Publ. House, 608 p. (In Russian.)
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1991). The Meaning of Rationality in the Social Sciences, (316–338) / In: R. Swedberg (Ed.). The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. USA-GB.: Princeton University Press. Shachle, G. (1972). Epistemics and Economics. A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge. Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 279 p. Torchinova, O. V., and Ermolenko, A. A. (2015). Phenomenon of social responsibility in conditions of development of integration processes. Krasnodar: Publ. House of the Southern Institute of Management, 278 p. (In Russian.)
• Wallerstein, I. (1989). The Modern World-System III. The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730–1840s. San Diego.
• Weber, М. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 1. Berkely: University California Press, 1469 p.
• Williamson, О. (1993). Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Industrial and corporate change, 2, 107–156.

Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606