SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

ECONOMY OF INCLUSIVE CIVILIZATION

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 15 (no. 3),

The article deals with the "inclusiveness" – the most humane organization of the human community. The author characterizes the category of inclusiveness in the following way: if one looks at each worker, it will be found that all of them have some peculiarities, problems and originality, a unique combination of which turns an employee into an individual personality. Accounting for all these personal characteristics, while maintaining equal treatment of workers, despite their distinguishing fads, addictions, abilities, passions, diseases and injuries, strong and weak competencies, poor quality education and quality training – is an inclusive organization of the economy. One can even say that inclusiveness is a "personified economy", that is, an economy built with respect to the creative characteristics of each employee. For an economically developed society inclusive organization of production is quite achievable. And, as the postindustrial economy grows into a creative one, inclusiveness becomes the main factor of economic growth. However a different – "multi-special" – organization of labor, production, economy and society, education and health, everyday and non-everyday life is required. Namely, such a "multisocial" organization is beyond the power of bureaucracy and state, because the latter cannot and are not able to reach every person and his/her personal characteristics. That is why inclusiveness, which grows out of the market principles, liberalism and democracy, and realizes them in full scale, becomes a priority trend in the mechanism of economic growth, which inevitably leads to the "inclusive civilization". Not surprisingly, today inclusiveness is in the focus of all social scientists of all countries. With this approach, we have to state that the modern world is preoccupied with a multitude of supra-individual problems.With the emergence of the phenomenon of "inclusiveness", the situation can change dramatically, because, in a broad sense, the tendency towards systemic inclusiveness means a conscious support of the society by the efforts of the individual striving for an existence worthy of human dignity. The author argues that, as the creative economy shapes, geared towards the realization of the personal potential of each economy’s participant, inclusiveness acquires the status of the main criterion of economic civilization. In fact, though not fully conscious, but between national economies, global competition is unfolding, showing its essence in the degree of real inclusiveness of national economy. The main author's conclusion is that each historical stage of social production experiences a different interest in its participants: at the initial stage, the individual principle had prevailed, and each participant of the economy had been important as a person, but then, with each subsequent stage, this interest faded away, with finally reached critical level at the age of conveyer production. And only advent of computerInternet technology returns interest to the employee's personality. The direct dependence occurs at that: the higher the creativity of production, the stronger the trend towards inclusiveness. Therefore, the transition to an inclusive civilization would symbolize (in the aspect of social organization of public life) a new step in curbing bureaucratic omnipotence and strengthening the positions of the civil society.


Keywords: inclusiveness; inclusive economy; inclusion as the new criterion of civilization

References:
  • Бодрунов, С. (2016). Новое индустриальное общество второго поколения: человек, производство, развитие // Общество и экономика, № 9, с. 5–21.
  • Катаева, О. В. (2015). Проблема критериев научности социально-гуманитарных наук // Известия Московского государственного технического университета МАМИ, т. 6, № 1(23), с. 74–77.
  • Кимелев, Ю. А., Полякова, Н. Л. (2014). Философия социальных наук // Вестник Московского университета, № 1, с. 20–46. Серия 18: Социология и политология
  • Магомедов, Н. Г., Качабеков, А. Г. (2003). Критерии научности социального знания. Махачкала.
  • Маркс, К., Энгельс, Ф. (1961). Соч., т. 19. М.: Политиздат.
  • Семенов, Ю. И. (1998). Марксова теория общественно-экономических формаций и современность // Философия и общество, № 3, с. 190–233.
  • Туманян, Ю. Р., Ищенко-Падукова, О. А., Мовчан, И. В. (2015). Инклюзивное образование – критерий цивилизованности общества и экономики. Ростов н/Д.: НаукаСпектр.
  • Яковлева, Е. Л. (2015). Эксклюзивная инклюзивность творческой личности // Карельский научный журнал, № 1.
  • Alfredsson, E., and Wijkman, A. (2014). The Inclusive Green Economy // MISTRA, Prestudy, April (http://www.mistra.org/download/18.2f9de4b14592a1589d17 2e2/1473225485133/Mistra_Prestudy_TheInclusiveGreenEconomy_April2014+%281%29. pdf).
  • Berberoglu, B. (2005). An introduction to classical and contemporary social theory: A critical perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • CAFOD (undated). Discussion paper: What is “inclusive growth”? (https://cafod.org. uk/content/download/17224/133626/file/Inclusive).
  • Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus (undated). Definition of “inclusiveness”. Cambridge University Press (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/ english/inclusiveness).
  • Commission on Growth and Development (2008). The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ bitstream/handle/10986/6507/449860PUB0Box3101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf).
  • Corrigan, G. (2017). Lessons from Norway, the world’s most inclusive economy // World Economic Forum (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/04/lessons-from-norway-theworld-s-most-inclusive-economy/).
  • Drummond, D., Capeluck, E., and Calver, M. (2015). The Key Challenge for Canadian Public Policy: Generating Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth // CSLS Research Report, 11, September (http://www.csls.ca/reports/csls2015-11.pdf).
  • Jacobs, M. & Mazzucato, M. (Eds.) (2016). Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Wiley-Blackwell, 224 p.
  • Kelly, M., Duncan, V., and Dubb, S. (2016). Strategies for financing the inclusive economy // Democracy Collaborative (http://democracycollaborative.org/financinginclusion).
  • Levitas, R. (1998). The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: Macmillan, 223 p.
  • Manyika, J., Pinkus, G., Ramaswamy, S., Woetzel, J., Nyquist, S., and Sohoni, A. (2016). The US economy: An agenda for inclusive growth // Briefing paper, November. McKinsey Global Institute (http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Global%20Themes/ Employment%20and%20Growth/Can%20the%20US%20economy%20return%20to%20 dynamic%20and%20inclusive%20growth/MGI-US-Economic-Agenda-Briefing-paper-November-2016.ashx).
  • Pacetti, E. G. (2016). The Five Characteristics of an Inclusive Economy: Getting Beyond the Equity-Growth Dichotomy // The Rockefeller Foundation, December 13 (https://www. rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/five-characteristics-inclusive-economy-getting-beyondequity-growth-dichotomy/).
  • The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017 // World Economic Forum (https:// www.weforum.org/reports/the-inclusive-growth-and-development-report-2017).
  • Wallace, J. (2016). Opportunity Youth: The Key To An Inclusive Economy // Forbes, May 16 (https://www.forbes.com/sites/gradsoflife/2016/05/16/opportunity-youth-thekey-to-an-inclusive-economy/#23a07a9f628d).
  • Whiteread, R. (undated). History of mass production // InfoBritain (http://www.infobritain.co.uk/mass_production.htm).
  • Alfredsson, E., and Wijkman, A. (2014). The Inclusive Green Economy. MISTRA, Prestudy, April / http://www.mistra.org/download/18.2f9de4b14592a1589d172e2/1473225485133/ Mistra_Prestudy_TheInclusiveGreenEconomy_April2014+%281%29.pdf).
  • Berberoglu, B. (2005). An introduction to classical and contemporary social theory: A critical perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bodrunov, S. (2016). A new industrial society of the second generation: man, production, development. Society and Economics, 9, 5–21. (In Russian.)
  • CAFOD (undated). Discussion paper: What is “inclusive growth”? (https://cafod.org. uk/content/download/17224/133626/file/Inclusive).
  • Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus (undated). Definition of “inclusiveness”. Cambridge University Press (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/ english/inclusiveness).
  • Commission on Growth and Development (2008). The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ bitstream/handle/10986/6507/449860PUB0Box3101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf).
  • Corrigan, G. (2017). Lessons from Norway, the world’s most inclusive economy. World Economic Forum (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/04/lessons-from-norway-theworld-s-most-inclusive-economy/).
  • Drummond, D., Capeluck, E., and Calver, M. (2015). The Key Challenge for Canadian Public Policy: Generating Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth. CSLS Research Report, 11, September (http://www.csls.ca/reports/csls2015-11.pdf).
  • Jacobs, M. & Mazzucato, M. (Eds.). (2016). Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Wiley-Blackwell, 224 p.
  • Kataeva, O. V. (2015). The problem of the criteria of scientificity of social and humanitarian sciences. Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University MAMI, 6(1), 74–77. (In Russian.)
  • Kelly, M., Duncan, V., and Dubb, S. (2016). Strategies for financing the inclusive economy. Democracy Collaborative (http://democracycollaborative.org/financinginclusion).
  • Kimelev, Yu. A. and Polyakova, N. L. (2014). Philosophy of Social Sciences. Bulletin of Moscow University, 1, 20–46. Series 18: Sociology and Political Science. (In Russian.)
  • Levitas, R. (1998). The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: Macmillan, 223 p.
  • Magomedov, N. G., and Kachabekov, A. G. (2003). Criteria of scientificity of social knowledge. Makhachkala. (In Russian.)
  • Manyika, J., Pinkus, G., Ramaswamy, S., Woetzel, J., Nyquist, S., and Sohoni, A. (2016). The US economy: An agenda for inclusive growth. Briefing paper, November. McKinsey Global Institute (http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Global%20Themes/ Employment%20and%20Growth/Can%20the%20US%20economy%20return%20to%20 dynamic%20and%20inclusive%20growth/MGI-US-Economic-Agenda-Briefing-paper-November-2016.ashx).
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1961). Works, 19. Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Pacetti, E. G. (2016). The Five Characteristics of an Inclusive Economy: Getting Beyond the Equity-Growth Dichotomy. The Rockefeller Foundation, December 13 (https://www. rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/five-characteristics-inclusive-economy-getting-beyondequity-growth-dichotomy/).
  • Semenov, Yu. I. (1998). Marx’s theory of socio-economic formations and modernity. Philosophy and Society, 3, 190–233. (In Russian.)
  • The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. World Economic Forum (https:// www.weforum.org/reports/the-inclusive-growth-and-development-report-2017).
  • Tumanyan, Yu. R., Ishchenko-Padukova, O. A., and Movchan, I. V. (2015). Inclusive education is the criterion of the civilization of society and the economy. Rostov-on-Don: Nauka-Spectr Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Wallace, J. (2016). Opportunity Youth: The Key To An Inclusive Economy. Forbes, May 16 (https://www.forbes.com/sites/gradsoflife/2016/05/16/opportunity-youth-thekey-to-an-inclusive-economy/#23a07a9f628d).
  • Whiteread, R. (undated). History of mass production. InfoBritain (http://www.infobritain.co.uk/mass_production.htm).
  • Yakovleva, E. L. (2015). Exclusive inclusiveness of the creative personality. Karelian scientific journal, 1. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606