TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 2),

Recent economic studies are increasingly focusing on the interdisciplinary agenda. The pioneer works by the Nobel laureates G. Ackerlof, R. Shiller, and wellknown economists D. Snower, D. Rodrik, S. Mukand, P. Collier emphasize the role of narratives in economics. Narratives are a valuable source of qualitative data for better understanding and modeling human behavior. Narrative discourse facilitates distribution of ideas, providing a framework for iterative economic interactions. Being widespread, ideas are increasingly perceived as the rules of interactions, providing informal or formal basis for institutions. Distribution of narratives requires a clear form, easily understandable for the masses. Thus, a range of studies appeal to the concept of narrative along with that of meme. Memes enable ideas which influence economic and political processes, to be easily disseminated and replicated. Distribution of narratives, memes and ideas depend on many factors including: their complementarity to embedded social values, culture, and actors’ beliefs and perceptions; dynamics of implicit and explicit knowledge dissemination; feedback effects, etc. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods are relevant for research on narratives, ideas and institutions, depending on the specificity of research questions and research objectives. Today narrative analysis provides an effective framework for economic policy research and empirical studies in institutional change.

Keywords: institutional economics; narrative economics; interdisciplinary research; qualitative research methodology; quantitative research methodology; groups of interests; institutions; narratives

  • Akerlof, G. and Schiller, R. (2011). Spiritus Animalis, or How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Alpina Business Books. (In Russian.)
  • Akerlof, G. A. and Snower, D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 58–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.021.
  • Almeida, F. (2018). Revisiting «Institutions»: A Study of the Evolution of Institutional Analysis. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(2), 323–335. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2018.1469861.
  • Arthur, J. B. and Huntley, C. L. (2005). Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1159–1170.
  • Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131. DOI: 10.2307/2234208.
  • Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. The American economic review, 84(1), 406–411.
  • Balatsky, E. V. (2012). Institutional and technological traps: analysis of the ideas. Journal of Economic Theory, ?(2), 48–63. (In Russian.)
  • Beer, D. (2016). Metric power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H. and Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.
  • Coase, R. (2007). Industrial Organisation: A Proposal for Research. Мoscow: Novoe izdatelstvo Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Colander, D. (2014). The Economics of Influence. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2), 485–492. DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624480223.
  • Collier, P. (2016). The cultural foundations of economic failure: A conceptual toolkit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 5–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.017.
  • Collins, C. J. and Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 544–560.
  • Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional Economics. The American Economic Review, 21, 648–657.
  • Damodaran, A. (2017). Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Business. New York; Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia Business School Publishing.
  • Dawkins, R. (2013). A selfish gene. Мoscow: AST Publ., Corpus Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609404.
  • Fioramonti, D. L. (2014). How numbers rule the world: The use and abuse of statistics in global politics. Zed Books Ltd.
  • Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511791307.
  • Hayek, F. (2002). Competition as a discovery procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9–23. DOI: 10.1007/s12113-002-1029-0.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1992). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Мoscow: Novosti Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Hindriks, F. and Guala, F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: a unified theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 459–480. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137414000496.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2002). Darwinism in economics: from analogy to ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(3), 259–281. DOI: 10.1007/s00191-002-0118-8.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2008). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Terra Economicus, 6(2), 8–21. (In Russian.)
  • Kermack, W. O. and A. G. McKendrick. (1927). A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 115(772), 701–21.
  • Klimchuk, V. (2015). Motivational discourse of personality: quantitative characteristics and comparative analysis. Social psychology and society, 6(1), 68–83. (In Russian.)
  • Markey-Towler, B. (2018). The competition and evolution of ideas in the public sphere: a new foundation for institutional theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1–22. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137418000061.
  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. and DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546.
  • Mordhorst, M. and Schwarzkopf, S. (2017). Theorising narrative in business history. Business History, 59(8), 1155–1175. DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2017.1357697.
  • Mukand, S. and Rodrik, D. (2018). The Political Economy of Ideas: On Ideas Versus Interests in Policymaking. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w24467.pdf. DOI: 10.3386/w24467.
  • Muller, J. Z. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton University Press.
  • Neale, W. C. (1987). Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1177–1206. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1987.11504700.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.
  • Nonaka, I. (2000). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, pp. 3–42 / In: D. E. Smith (Ed.). Knowledge, groupware and the Internet. Boston: Heinemann.
  • North, D. (1993). Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction. THESIS, (2), 69–91. (In Russian.)
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678.
  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400829484.
  • Olson, M. (1995). The Devolution of the Nordic and Teutonic Economies. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 22–27.
  • Polterovich, V. M. (1999). Institutional Traps and Economic Reforms. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 35(2). (In Russian.)
  • Roy, D. (2017). Myths about memes. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(3), 281–305. DOI: 10.1007/s10818-017-9250-2.
  • Rozenblit, L. and Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1.
  • Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative Economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967– 1004. DOI: 10.1257/aer.107.4.967.
  • Tambovtsev, V. (2013). Institutions-as-equilibriums vs institutions-as-rules. Journal of Economic Theory, (4), 111–122. (In Russian.)
  • Tambovtsev, V. (2015). Institutions in sociology, political science and jurisprudence: an economist’s perspective. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, (1), 115–126. (In Russian.)
  • Trotsuk, I. V. (2006). Theory and practice of narrative analysis in sociology. Moscow: Publishing House of the Peoplesʼ Friendship University of Russia, 207 p. (In Russian.)
  • Tumilovich, M. (2003). Formalism, economic education and economics. ECOVEST (The Economic Bulletin), ?(1), 102–123. (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V. (2015). Interdisciplinarity in economic science: between imperialism and pluralism. Terra Economicus, 13(4), 52–64. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2015-4-52-64). (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V. V. (2003). The failures of economic theory and the dependence on the previous path of development. Terra Economicus, 1(3), 36–42. (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V. V. (2014). Inductive Reasoning and Economic Behavior. Journal of Institutional Studies, 6(3), 6–13. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2241.3762. (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V. V. (2017). Narrative and Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional Studies, 9(4), 132–143. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.4.132-143. (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V. V., Berezhnoy, I. V. (2012). Selection and Exactation of Institutions: The Role of Groups of Special Interests. Ch. 8, pp. 165–187 / In: A. Arkhipov, S. Kirdina and E. Martishin (Eds.) Evolutionary and institutional economic theory: discussions, methods and applications. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Waddock, S. (2018a). Shaping the Shift: Shamanic Leadership, Memes, and Transformation. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming, 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3900-8.
  • Waddock, S. (2018b). Narrative, Memes, and the Prospect of Large Systems Change. Humanistic Management Journal, 3(1), 17–45. DOI: 10.1007/s41463-018-0039-9.
  • Wang, S. & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115–131.
  • Yefimov, V. M. (2011). Discoursive economics: methodology and history of economics reconsidered. Journal of Economic Regulation, 2(3), 5–79.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606