• Home
  • Issues
  • 2018
  • No 2
  • The epoch of quasi-commercial fetishism (on the 200th anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx)

THE EPOCH OF QUASI-COMMERCIAL FETISHISM (on the 200th anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx)

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 2),

Two hundred years ago a genius was born, who influenced modern social studies. The «theory of commodity fetishism» is one of the remarkable features of the Marxist methodological framework. This theory is the key to understanding the essence of the modern economy: those economists who are well-acquainted with it, may be proudly referred as the theorist, as opposed to those who are only applied economists, not familiar with the theory of commodity fetishism. The article deals with the elements of Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism, remained underestimated, with the reasons for the commodity fetishism’s transformation into a quasi-commodity one, and with the dangers of the quasi-commodity fetishism. The theory of commodity fetishism is set forth in the final, fourth, paragraph of the famous first chapter of the first volume of «Capital» by Karl Marx. The fate of this paragraph is amazing. Usually, the readers of the first chapter pay more attention to the historical logic of the commodity exchange genesis, with the fourth paragraph set aside. Meanwhile, this paragraph is the one which deals with the author’s striking insights into the essence of the economic relations. Moreover, this text also deals with the «defetisation» of the subject of economic theory. The article focuses on quasi-commodity fetishism, which reduces the social essence of the economy to commodities’ substitutes. The author defines «quasicommodity fetishism» as an imaginary autonomy of a non-independent commodity fetishism. As the author argues, appearance of quasi-commodity fetishism was due to transformation of the economy into the quasi-economy. In the quasi-economy, the circulars and orders issued by the officials become dominant commodities. It is not surprising that the real economy is being displaced by its imitation – quasi-commodity production with its curious quasi-commodities, tirelessly manufactured by the bureaucratic structures.

Keywords: fetishism; commodity fetishism; quasi-commodity fetishism; quasieconomy; quasi goods

  • Atayan, V. V. (2008). Commodity fetishism as a factor determining the consciousness. Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences, 5, 11–13. (In Russian.)
  • Atayan, V. V. (2016). Deployment of global materialized value orientation in the XX – early XXI century. Philosophy of economy, 2, 165–173. (In Russian.)
  • Bensaid, D. (2012). The play as the highest stage of commodity fetishism. Marx, Marcuse, Debor, Lefevre, Baudrillard etc. Moscow: Institute for General Humanitarian Studies Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Bogdanov, K. A. (2015). Chewing gum, Leningrad teenagers and commodity fetishism under developed socialism. Anthropological forum, 25, 69–90. (In Russian.)
  • Buzgalin, A. V. and Kolganov, A. I. (2012). «Capital» of the 21st century: simulacrum as an object of analysis of critical Marxism. Issues of Philosophy, 11, 31–42. (In Russian.)
  • Efremov, O. A. (2012). Commodity fetishism of the postmodern era: On the issue of the nature of the «new» capitalism. Philosophy and Society, 2, 76–89. (In Russian.)
  • Komarov, A. A. (2015). Commodity fetishism in the genesis of teenager’s criminal behavior, pp. 33–40. In: Scientific works, 5(10). Actual problems of criminal and criminal procedural law: current state and development prospects (Special Issue: «Deviant behavior of adolescents as a form of manifestation of a deficit of moral and moral development of the individual»). Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. (In Russian.)
  • Lisovskaya, I. V. (2013). Infinite consumerism as a crisis of the way of self-realization of modern man. Bulletin of Hrodna State University. Series 1. The history and archeology. Philosophy. political science, 3, 86–91. (In Russian.)
  • Malitz, Z. (undated). Commodity fetishism. Beautiful Trouble (http://beautifultrouble.org/theory/commodity-fetishism/ – Access Date: 25.05.2018).
  • Marx, K. (1960). Capital. Criticism of political economy / In: Marx K., Engels F. Coll. papers, vol. 23. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R. M. (1985). To the question of the place of commodity fetishism in the theory of value by K. Marx. Economics (Samara), 2, 18–23. (In Russian.)
  • Oparina, N. A. and Tsvetkova, G. S. (2014). The multiplicity of factors of demonstrative consumption: the evolution of research. Modern problems of science and education, 5, 435. (In Russian.)
  • Popynova, O. S. (2013). Commodity fetishism as a «marketing religion». Practical marketing, 6, 29–38. (In Russian.)
  • Robinson, A. (2010). In Theory – Karl Marx’s fetishisms. Ceasefire Magazine, September, 23 (https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/in-theory-karl-marxs-fetishisms/ – Access Date: 25.05.2018).
  • Rubin, I. (2013). Marx’s Theory of Commodity Fetishism. In: Rubin I. Essays on Marx’s theory of value (https://libcom.org/library/i-marxs-theory-commodity-fetishism – Access Date: 25.05.2018).
  • Sahin, K. (2009). Karl Marx Warenfetischismus und seine Auswirkung auf die politische Ökonomie. Hochschule Freie Universität Berlin (https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/134956 – Access Date: 25.05.2018).
  • Sergienko, L. (2016). Socio-economic genotypic nature of man and commodity fetishism as one of the ways of its manifestation. RISK: Resources, information, supply, competition, 4, 86–89. (In Russian.)
  • Tromsness, R. (2016). Marx: A Summary of «The Fetishism of Commodities». Owlcation, June 13 (https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Analysis-of-Marx-The-fetishismof-commodities – Access Date: 25.05.2018).
  • Voeikov, M. I. (2012). I. I. Rubin and the methodological problems of political economy (reflection of the discussions of the 1920s). Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 14–25. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606