SFeDu

RETHINKING MARX’S LABOR THEORY OF VALUE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 2),

Marx’s labor theory of value is being formed and developed under certain historical conditions, it went through the process from questions to support and from support to positive innovation. This process is not only the process of Marx’s understanding of historical materialism, but also the combination of historical materialism and labor theory of value. Only by clarifying the scientific process of Marx’s labor theory of value and deepening the modern understanding of Marx’s labor theory of value can we really grasp the essence of the theory of labor value and grasp its great significance more comprehensively. The article reveals the formation of the theory of labor value in the works of Karl Marx, as well as estimates of the current value of the labor theory of value for finding solutions to the challenges of modern social and economic life. The author focuses on the following provisions, indicating the theoretical and practical significance of Marx’s labor theory of value: (1) it provides the theoretical basis for historical materialism; (2) it does not only have guiding significance for the liberation of working class, but also indicates that the working class will be the representative of advanced productive forces in the future; (3) it makes the socialism from dream to science, and lays the theoretical basis for the scientific socialism. The author also identifies the following directions for deepening the Marx’s labor theory of value, necessary for its development in the 21st century: definition of productive labor and non-productive labor; the role of scientific and technological personnel and management personnel in social production and value creation; the understanding of the relationship between value creation and value distribution.


Keywords: Marx; labor theory of value; formation and development of theory; productive labor and non-productive labor; contemporary significance of the labor theory of value

References:
  • Amin, S. (1997). Capitalism in the Age of Globalization. The Management of Contemporary society. L. – N.Y.
  • Amin, S. (2018). Modern Imperialism, Monopoly Finance Capitalism, and Marx’s Law of Value. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Bellofiore, R. (2018). The Multiple Meanings of Marx’s Value Theory // Monthly Review, 69(11), DOI: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-069-11-2018-04_3.
  • Boltansky, L., and Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. L.-NY: Verso.
  • Castells, M. (2010). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 406 p.
  • Comor, E. (2015). Revisiting Marx’s Value Theory: A Critical Response to Analyses of Digital Prosumption // The Information Society, 31(1), 13–19, DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2015.977627.
  • Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. N.Y. City: Harper Business.
  • Fine, B., and Saad-Filho, A. (2018). Marx 200: The Abiding Relevance of the Labour Theory of Value // Review of Political Economy, Published online: 15 March, DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2018.1424068
  • Foley, D. K. (2000). Recent Developments in the Labor Theory of Value // Review of Radical Political Economics, 32(1), 1–39.
  • Kotz, D. M. (2015). The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
  • Lee, C.-O. (1993). Marx’s Labour Theory of Value Revisited // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(4), 463–478, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035249.
  • Li, B. (2014). Marx’s Labor Theory of Value and Its Implications for Structural Problems in China’s Economy // Economic And Political Studies, 2(2), 139–150, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2014.11673848.
  • Mandel, E. (1967). The Labor Theory of Value and Monopoly Capitalism // International Socialist Review, 28(4), 29–42.
  • Mandel, E. (1987). Late Capitalism. London – New York: Verso.
  • Marginson, S. (1998). Value creation in the production of services: A note on Marx // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(5), 573–585, DOI: 10.1093/cje/22.5.573.
  • Marx, K. (1980). Economics Manuscripts 1857–1858 / In:
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. The Complete Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, vol. 46. Beijing: People’s Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1956). The Complete Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, vol. 1. Beijing: People’s Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1957). The Complete Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, vol. 2. Beijing: People’s Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1960). The Complete Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, vol. 3. Beijing: People’s Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1965). The Complete Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, vol. 21. Beijing: People’s publishing house. (In Chinese.)
  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (2009). Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, vol. 8. Beijing: People’s publishing house. (In Chinese.)
  • Meng, J. (2010). Labor theory of value and the uncertainty in capitalist economy // Frontiers of Economics in China, 5(4), 657–676, DOI: 10.1007/s11459-010-0118-9.
  • Mohun, S. (1996). Productive and Unproductive Labor in the Labor Theory of Value // Review of Radical Political Economics, 18(4), 30–54.
  • Ouellet, M. (2015). Revisiting Marx’s Value Theory: Elements of a Critical Theory of Immaterial Labor in Informational Capitalism // The Information Society, 31(1), 20–27, DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2015.977628.
  • Postone, M. (1993). Time, Labor, and Social Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tong, Y. (2011). Thinking of Marx’s Labor Theory of Value for Deepening // Reformation & Strategy, 6, 15–17. (In Chinese.)
  • Yang, Y. (2008). The Theory of Labor Value of Marx: Scientific Connotation Modern Forms and Significant in Contemporary // Lanzhou Academic Journal, 11, 33–36. (In Chinese)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606