• Home
  • Issues
  • 2018
  • No 2
  • Structural changes in the Russian grain balance in the conditions of anti-Russian sanctions: regional aspect


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 2),

Despite the growth of the Russian grain market, the issue of the quality of structural shifts remains insufficiently developed. During the period of anti-Russian sanctions, there are tendencies that indicate the existence of transformation processes in the structure of the balance of the use of grain raw materials. However, at the present stage of development, it can be noted that there are significant restrictions on import substitution. Based on the official state statistics and «Zerno Online» news agency, the structural shifts in the balance of grain use in 62 regions of the Russian Federation were analyzed for the period 2010‒2017. Based on the calculation of the Gatev and Ryabtsev indices, the grouping of Russian regions according to the intensity and level of structural shifts in the balance of the use of grain has been carried out, and the mass of structural shifts in the groups obtained has been determined. By the specification of the complex methodology for analyzing the structural shifts of Sukharev, an evaluation of the conditions for import substitution and industrialization on the received groups of regions was carried out. The analysis showed that there were no significant positive structural changes in the balance of use of grain resources. Most of the regions demonstrate the priority of the export component, which is caused by the lack of demand for additional crops within the regions. The market situation (including the price level), in turn, is determined by the increase in the volume of exports. From the normative point of view, options for state support in the sphere of deep processing of grain crops, in particular project financing, a special investment contract, as well as revision of excise taxes on bioethanol are considered.

Keywords: agriculture; grain balance; structural shifts; sanctions; import substitution

  • Aganbegyan, A. G. (2017). Agriculture – the locomotive of socio-economic growth in Russia. ECO, 5, 5–22. (In Russian.)
  • Aleshchenko, V. V., Aleshchenko, O. A. and Chupin, R. I. (2017). Forecasting the capacity of the wheat market based on the construction of a model of interregional interindustry balance. Marketing in Russia and abroad, 1(117), 78–92. (In Russian.)
  • Araujo-Enciso, S. R. et al. (2017). Eurasian Grain Markets in an Uncertain World: A Focus on Yield Variability and Harvest Failures in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan and Their Impact on Global Food Security, pp. 247–257 / In: Gomez y Paloma S., Mary S., Langrell S. and Ciaian P. (eds.) The Eurasian Wheat Belt and Food Security Global and Regional Aspects. Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33239-0.
  • Barsukova, S. (2016). Dilemma «farmers-agroholdings» in the context of import substitution. Social Sciences and Modernity, 5, 63–74. (In Russian.)
  • Barsukova, S. (2017). Doctrine of food security of the Russian Federation: declaration of intent or vector of agrarian policy? pp. 135–146 / In: Pugacheva М. G. and Zharkov V. P. (Eds.) Ways of Russia. War and Peace. Collection of articles, vol. 22. Proceedings from of the XXII International Symposium, March 27–28, 2015, Moscow. St. Petersburg [and others]: Nestor-History Publ, 292 p. (In Russian.)
  • Berkovich, L. A. (1989). Interrelation of the processes of production intensification and structural shifts in the economy. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Djuric, I. and Götz, L. (2018). Do export restrictions reduce domestic price volatility? Evidence from the wheat export controls in Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine, pp. 115–128 / In: Pfaffenzeller S. (ed.) Global Commodity Markets and Development Economics, Routledge Studies in Development Economics. Routledge.
  • Eliseeva, I. I. (2003). Social statistics. Moscow. Finances and Statistics Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Elkhina, I. (2015). Evaluation of structural shifts and differences in regional economic systems in the South of Russia. Journal of Economic Regulation, 6(4), 103–110. (In Russian.)
  • Fagerberg, J. (2000). Technological Progress, Structural Change and Productivity Growth: A Comparative Study. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 393–411.
  • Gumerov, R. and Guseva, N. (2018). On the effects and paradoxes of import substitution in the context of national food security. ECO, 2, 90–102. (In Russian.)
  • Kapoguzov, E., Chupin, R. and Kharlamova, M. (2017). Institutional alternatives to the food embargo in the context of a new wave of anti-Russian sanctions (on materials from the meat industry). Journal of Economic Regulation, 8(3), 23–35. (In Russian.)
  • Metcalfe, J. S., Foster, J. and Ramlogan, R. (2006). Adaptive Economic Growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(1), 7–32.
  • Namsaraev, Z. B. et al. (2018). Current status and potential of bioenergy in the Russian Federation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 625–634.
  • Nureev, R. (2001). Development Economics: Models of Market Economy Formation. Moscow: Publishing house INFRA-M. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R. and Busygin, E. (2017). The Russian Agro-Industrial Complex in the Conditions of Economic Sanctions: Problems of Improving the Effectiveness of Import-Substitution Policy. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 8–25. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R. and Petrakov, P. (2016). Economic sanctions against Russia: expectations and reality. The world of a new economy, 3, 14–31. (In Russian.)
  • Nurkse, R. (1952). Growth in Underdeveloped Countries: Some International Aspects of the Problem of Economic Development. American Economic Review, 3, 571–582.
  • Ryabtsev, V. and Chudilina, G. (2001). Regional statistics. Moscow: MFA Publ.
  • Schierhorn, F. et al. (2014). The potential of Russia to increase its wheat production through cropland expansion and intensification. Global Food Security, 3(3-4), 133–141.
  • Shevchenko, I. and Razvadovskaya, Y. (2012). Methods of analysis of structural transformations of the economy of the industrial sector in the conditions of formation of a new technological order. Public and municipal management. Scientific notes of SCAGS, 2, 111–119. (In Russian.)
  • Smutka, L. et al. (2016). Agrarian import ban and its impact on the Russian and European Union agrarian trade performance. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 62(11), 493–506.
  • Sukharev, O. (2012a). Evaluation of structural changes in the Russian economy. A report at a seminar by Prof. I.A Pogosov (http://inecon.org/docs/Sukharev_seminar_20131024.pdf – Accessed Date: 25.04.2018). (In Russian.)
  • Sukharev, O. (2012b). Structural analysis of the economy. Moscow: Finances and Statistics Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Sukharev, O. (2013). To the development of a comprehensive methodology for analyzing structural shifts. National interests: priorities and security, 13, 36–42. (In Russian.)
  • Sukharev, O. and Malyavina, A. (2008). Structural changes and methods of their study in economic theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 122–139. (In Russian.)
  • Titov, V. (2006). Methodological approaches to the analysis of structural transformations of the economy. Transport business of Russia, 12(IV), 45–47. (In Russian.)
  • Tulokhonov, A. (2018). Again about the «struggle» with the harvest, or where the locomotive of the Russian economy is going. ECO, 4, 102–116. (In Russian.)
  • Visser, O., Spoor, M. and Mamonova, N. (2014). Is Russia the emerging global ‘breadbasket’? Re-cultivation, agroholdings and grain production. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(10), 1589–1610.
  • Wengle, S. (2016). The Domestic Effects of the Russian Food Embargo. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 24(3), 281–289.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606