SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

Strategic planning theory: An institutional perspective


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 18 (no. 2),

The article elaborates on the essential elements of institutional theory of strategic planning (ITSP). This theory specifies the general institutional planning theory (IPT), previously presented by the authors. The differences between ITSP and other versions of IPT are described. As the analysis shows, most of current approaches either treat strategies as strategic plans or view strategy development as a stage of strategic planning. We suggest that the strategy development may even be an intuitive process, and methods of strategy development differ from the methods of strategic planning. From this perspective, we define strategic planning as a planning that is based on a previously developed strategy, the latter may be developed implicitly. Further, the authors apply this approach to the strategic planning in public organizations. Findings from the literature review show that planning in public organizations does not necessarily take into account spatial planning experience and differences in institutional environment among the countries. Strategic planning implementation success depends on interorganizational institutional environments. The strategy itself may become an important institution, once employees assume that they can benefit from the new relationships. Sensemaking and leadership can help in arriving at a strategic consensus. We argue that public sector reforms implemented according to the new public management philosophy have a negative impact on these processes.
Citation: Tambovtsev, V. L., Rozhdestvenskaya, I. A. (2020). Strategic planning theory: An institutional perspective. Terra Economicus, 18(2), 22–48. DOI: 10.18522/2073- 6606-2020-18-2-22-48


Keywords: strategy; strategic plan; institutional planning theory; public sector organization

JEL codes:

References:
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211.
  • Alexander, E. (1992). A Transaction Cost Theory of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58 (2), 190–200.
  • Alexander, E. R. (2002). Planning Rights: Toward Normative Criteria for Evaluating Plans. International Planning Studies, 7 (3), 191–212.
  • Alexander, E. R. (2007). Planning rights and their Implications. Planning Theory, 6 (2), 112–126.
  • Ambrosino, A., Fontana, M., Gigante, A. A. (2018). Shifting Boundaries in Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand and the Future of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32 (3), 767–791.
  • Armstrong, J. S. (1982). The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research. Strategic Management Journal, 3 (3), 197–211.
  • Banfield, E. C. (1977). Corruption as a Feature of Governmental Organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (3), 587–605.
  • Barnes, J. H., Jr. (1984). Cognitive Biases and Their Impact on Strategic Planning. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 129–137.
  • Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. (2000). The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning. Sloan Management Review, 41 (4), 29–40.
  • Berger, P., Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
  • Bowman, C. (1997). The essence of strategic management. Moscow: Banki i birzhi Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39 (1), 97–122.
  • Broucker, B., Wit, K. D., Verhoeven, J. C. (2018). Higher education for public value: Taking the debate beyond new public management. Higher Education Research & Development, 37 (2), 227–240.
  • Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of Harsh and Unpredictable Environments in Adolescence on Development of Life History Strategies: A Longitudinal Test of an Evolutionary Model. Human Nature, 20 (1), 25–51.
  • Bryson, J. A. (1988). A Strategic Planning Process for Public and Non-profit Organizations. Long Range Planning, 21 (1), 73–81.
  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., Bryson, J. K. (2009). Understanding Strategic Planning and the Formulation and Implementation of Strategic Plans as a Way of Knowing: The Contributions of Actor-Network Theory. International Public Management Journal, 12 (2), 172–207.
  • Bryson, J. M., Edwards, L. H., Van Slyke, D. M. (2018). Getting strategic about strategic planning research. Public Management Review, 20 (3), 317–339.
  • Campbell, A., Alexander, M. (1997). What’s wrong with strategy? Harvard Business Review, 75 (6), 42–51.
  • Canhilal, S. K., Lepori, B., Seeber, M. (2016). Decision-Making Power and Institutional Logic in Higher Education Institutions: A Comparative Analysis of European Universities.
  • Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 45, 169–194.
  • Chaffee, E. E. (1985). Three Models of Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10 (1), 89–98.
  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chen, C. P. (1998). Understanding career development: a convergence of perspectives. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50 (3), 437–461.
  • Cheng, M., Humphreys, K. (2016). Managing strategic uncertainty: The diversity and use of performance measures in the balanced scorecard. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31 (4/5), 512–534.
  • Csaszar, F. A. (2018). What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Science, 3 (4), 606–619.
  • Dunleavy, P., Hood, C. (1994). From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Money and Management, 14 (3), 9–16.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in highvelocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4), 737–770.
  • Ellis, G. (2004). Discourses of objection: towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36 (9), 1549–1570.
  • Faludi, A. (1973). Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Faludi, A. (1986). Towards a Theory of Strategic Planning. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 1 (3), 253–268.
  • Favoreu, C., Carassus, D., Maurel, C. (2016). Strategic management in the public sector: a rational, political or collaborative approach? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82 (3), 435–453.
  • Fawaz, M., Moumtaz, N. (2017). Of property and planning: a brief introduction. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 345–350.
  • Ferlie, E. (1992). The creation and evolution of quasi markets in the public sector: A problem for strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (S2), 79–97.
  • Ferlie, E. (2003). Quasi-Strategy: Strategic Management in Contemporary Public Sector, pp. 279–298 / In: A.M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, R. Whittington (eds.) Handbook of Strategy and Management. London: Sage.
  • Ferreira, A., Sykes, O., Batey, P. (2009). Planning Theory or Planning Theories? The Hydra Model and its Implications for Planning Education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4 (2), 29–54. DOI: 10.11120/jebe.2009.04020029
  • Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., Hill, D., Wenner, C. J., Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and Life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26 (2), 243–275.
  • Figueredo, A. J., Vasquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Sefcek, J. A., Kirsner, B. R., Jacobs, W. J. (2005). The K-factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 39 (8), 1349–1360.
  • Fischel, W. (1978). A property rights approach to municipal zoning. Land Economics, 54 (1), 64–81.
  • Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, New York: Doubleday-Anchor.
  • Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.
  • George, B., Walker, R. M. (2019). Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta-Analysis. Public Administration Review, 79 (6), 810–819.
  • Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Gioia, D. A., Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6), 433–448.
  • Goldvarg, E., Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: a mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25 (4), 565–610.
  • Gurkov, I. B. (2007). Integrated metrics of strategic process – attempt of the theoretical synthesis and empirical testing. Russian Management Journal, 5 (2), 3–28. (In Russian.)
  • Hall, P. A., Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5), 936–957.
  • Hansen, J. R., Ferlie, E. (2016), Applying Strategic Management Theories in Public Sector Organizations: Developing a typology. Public Management Review, 18 (1), 1–19.
  • Hatten, K. J. (1979). Quantitative research methods in strategic management, рр. 448–467 / In: D.E. Schendel, C.W. Hofer (eds.) Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
  • Healey, P. (2009). In Search of the “Strategic” in Spatial Strategy Making. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 439–457.
  • Healey, P., Williams, R. (1993). European planning systems: diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30 (4-5), 701–720.
  • Hodgkinson, I. R. (2012). Are generic strategies ‘fit for purpose’ in a public service context? Public Policy and Administration, 28 (1), 90–111.
  • Hofer, C. W. (1973). Some preliminary research on patterns of strategic behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), 46–59.
  • Hohfeld, W. N. (1917). Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning.
  • Yale Law Journal, 26 (8), 710–770. DOI: 10.2307/786270
  • Holmberg, D., Hallonsten, O. (2015). Policy reform and academic drift: research mission and institutional legitimacy in the development of the Swedish higher education system 1977–2012. European Journal of Higher Education, 5 (2), 181–196.
  • Hudson, B. M., Galloway, T. D., Kaufman, J. L. (1979). Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45 (4), 387–398.
  • Iederan, O. C., Curseu, P. L., Vermeulen, P. A. M., Geurts, J. L. A. (2011). Cognitive representations of institutional change: Similarities and dissimilarities in the cognitive schema of entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24 (1), 9–28.
  • Irons, W. (2005). How has evolution shaped human behavior? Richard Alexander’s contribution to an important question. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26 (1), 1–9.
  • Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison. Planning Practice and Research, 27 (1), 63–85.
  • Johanson, J. E. (2009). Strategy formation in public agencies. Public Administration, 87 (4), 872–891.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., Khemlani, S. S. (2017). Mental Models and Causation, рр. 169–187 / In: M.R. Waldmann (ed.) The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Katkalo, V. C. (2002). The theory of strategic management: development stages and main paradigms. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University. Series 8. Management, 2 (16), 3–21. (In Russian.)
  • Kersbergen, van K., Van Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43 (2), 143–171.
  • Kim, A. M. (2012). The evolution of the institutional approach in planning, рр. 69–86 / In: R. Crane, R. Weber (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kleiner, G. B., Tambovtsev, V. L., Kachalov, R. M. (1997). Enterprise in unstable economic environment: Risks, strategies, safety. Moscow: Economika Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Knights, D., Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique. Organization Studies, 12 (2), 251–273.
  • Kumar, A. (2011). Planning Rights: A Review and Discussion. Journal of Institute of Town Planners, 8 (4), 21–30.
  • Lai, L. W.-C. (2010). A model of planning by contract: Integrating comprehensive state planning, freedom of contract, public participation and fidelity. Town Planning Review, 81 (6), 647–673.
  • Lai, L. W.-С. (2005). Neo-Institutional Economics and Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 4(1), 7–19.
  • Le Grand, J. (1991). Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. Economic Journal, 101(408), 1256– 1267.
  • Leiblein, M. J., Reuer, J., Zenger, T. R. (2018). What Makes a Decision Strategic? Strategy Science, 3 (4), 555–682.
  • Lindenberg, S. (1998). The Cognitive Turn in Institutional Analysis: Beyond NIE and NIS?
  • Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154 (4), 716–727.
  • Llewellyn, S., Tappin, E. (2003). Strategy in the Public Sector: Management in the Wilderness. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (4), 955–982.
  • Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6), 1305–1335.
  • MacCrimmon, K. R. (1993). Do Firm Strategies Exist? Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue), 113–130.
  • Maiminas, E. Z., Tambovtsev, V. L., Fonotov, A. G. (Eds.) (1985). Goals and resources in longrange planning. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Maitlis, S., Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8 (1), 57–125.
  • Malan, R. (2011). Exploring the interconnectedness among strategy development, shared mental models, organisational learning and organisational change. International Journal of Learning and Change, 5 (3-4), 227–241.
  • Mandelbaum, S. J. (1985). The Institutional Focus of Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 5 (1), 3–9.
  • Menon, A. R. (2018). Bringing Cognition into Strategic Interactions: Strategic Mental Models and Open Questions. Strategic Management Journal, 39 (1), 168–192.
  • Meyfroodt, K., Desmidt, S., Goeminne, S. (2019). Do Politicians See Eye to Eye? The Relationship between Political Group Characteristics, Perceived Strategic Plan Quality, and Strategic Consensus in Local Governing Majorities. Public Management Review, 79 (5),
  • 749–759.
  • Milgrom, P., Roberts, J. (1988). An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement), S154–S179.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72 (1), 107–114.
  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (2) 246–275.
  • Moulaert, F. (2005). Institutional economics and planning theory: a partnership between ostriches? Planning Theory, 4 (1), 21–32.
  • Narayanan, V. K., Zane, L. J., Kemmerer, B. (2011). The Cognitive Perspective in Strategy: An Integrative Review. Journal of Management, 37 (1), 305–351.
  • Nelson, R. H. (1977). Zoning and Property Rights: An Analysis of the American System of Land Use Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Neugebauer, F., Figge, F., Hahn, T. (2016). Planned or Emergent Strategy Making? Exploring the Formation of Corporate Sustainability Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(5), 323–336.
  • Nickerson, J. A., Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problemsolving perspective. Organization Science, 15 (6), 617–632.
  • Nutt, P. C., Backoff, R. W. (1993). Organizational Publicness and Its Implications for Strategic Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3 (2), 209–231.
  • Ocasio, W., Joseph, J. (2008). Rise and fall – or transformation? The evolution of strategic planning at the General Electric Company, 1940–2006. Long Range Planning, 41 (3), 248–272.
  • Othengrafen, F., Reimer, M. (2013). The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts: Theoretical Foundations for the Analysis of Dynamic Planning Cultures. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45 (6), 1269–1284.
  • Oxley, M., Brown, T., Nadin, V., Qu, L., Tummers, L., Fernández-Maldonado, A. M. (2009). Review of European Planning Systems. Leicester: De Montfort University.
  • Perry, J., Rainey, H. (1988). The Public–Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13 (2), 182–201.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1977). Strategy formulation as a political process. International Studies of Management and Organization, 7 (2), 78–87.
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2015). On the formation of national planning system in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, (2), 237–242. (In Russian.)
  • Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., Fox, C. (2011). Behavioral Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (13), 1369–1386.
  • Rapert, M. I., Velliquette, A., Garretson, J. A. (2002). The strategic implementation process: evoking strategic consensus through communication. Journal of Business Research, 55 (4), 301–310.
  • Revonsuo, A. (2000). The reinterpretation of dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 793–1121.
  • Ring, P. S., Perry, J. L. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 10 (2), 276–286.
  • Schilit, W. K. (1987). Upward Influence Activity in Strategic Decision Making. Group & Organization Studies, 12 (3), 343–368.
  • Schmidt, S., Buehler, R. (2007). The planning process in the US and Germany: a comparative analysis. International Planning Studies, 12 (1), 55–75.
  • Semenova, E. L. (2011). Strategy planning as a system characteristic of modern business organization, Discussion, (4), 9–11. (In Russian.)
  • Shepherd, S. (2018). Managerialism: an ideal type. Studies in Higher Education, 43 (9), 1668–1678.
  • Shrivastava, P., Nachman, S. A. (1989). Strategic leadership patterns. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (S1), 51–66.
  • Shvetsov, A. N. (2017). Strategic planning in the Russian Way: The triumph of the centralized bureaucratic choice. ECO journal, (8), 114–127. (In Russian.)
  • Sibony, O., Lovallo, D., Powell, T. C. (2017). Behavioral Strategy and the Strategic Decision Architecture of the Firm. California Management Review, 59 (3), 5–21.
  • Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6), 467–482.
  • Stevens, J. M., McGowan, R. (1983). Managerial strategies in municipal government organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (3), 527–534.
  • Stewart, J. (2004). The meaning of strategy in the public sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63 (4), 16–21.
  • Tambovtsev, V. (2011). Types of economic action. Social Sciences, 42 (2), 3–17.
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2000). Contractual model of a firm strategy. Moscow: TEIS Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2017). Planning and opportunism. Voprosy Economiki, (1), 22–39. (In Russian.)
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2019). The abundance of institutionalisms: Toward a prosperity or crisis? P. 277–282 / In: V.S. Avtonomov, A.Ja. Rubinshtein (eds.) Economic science: forgotten and rejected theories. Moscow: IE RAN Publ., 292 p. (In Russian.)
  • Tambovtsev, V. L., Rozhdestvenskaya, I. A. (2018). Institutional planning theory as a general planning theory: State of the art and further development. Теrrа Economicus, 16 (2), 27–45. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-2-27-45 (In Russian.)
  • Taylor, Z. (2013). Rethinking planning culture: a new institutionalist approach. Town Planning Review, 84 (6), 683–702.
  • Uskova, T. V. (2009). Management of sustainable development of the region. Vologda: Institute of Socio-Economic Development of Territories of RAS Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Valli, K., Revonsuo, A. (2009). The threat simulation theory in light of recent empirical evidence: A review. American Journal of Psychology, 122 (1), 17–38.
  • Van Cauwenbergh, A., Cool, K. (1982). Strategic management in a new framework. Strategic Management Journal, 3 (3), 245–265.
  • Van den Steen, E. (2017). A formal theory of strategy. Management Science, 63 (8), 2616– 2636.
  • Van Wart, M. (2013). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91 (3), 521–543.
  • Vasilyev, S. A. (Ed.) (2003). Territorial strategic planning under transition to market economy: Russian urbans experience. Saint Petersburg: Leontief Centre. (In Russian.)
  • Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review. Public Administration & Development, 24 (2), 101–118. Verma, N. (Ed.) (2007). Institutions and planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Volchik, V. V., Koryttsev, M. A., Maslyukova, E. V. (2019). Institutions and ideology of managerialism in higher education and science. Upravlenets – The Manager, 10 (6), 15–27. (In Russian.)
  • Webster, C. (1989). Public choice, Pigovian and Coasian planning theory. Urban Studies, 35 (1), 53–75.
  • Webster, C., Adams, D., Pearce, B., Henneberry, J., Ward, S. V. (2005). The New Institutional Economics and the evolution of modern urban planning: Insights, issues and lessons. Town Planning Review, 76 (4), 455–484.
  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. London: Sage.
  • Whorton, J. W., Worthley, J. A. (1981). A perspective on the challenge of public management: Environmental paradox and organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 6 (3), 357–362.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1999). Public and private bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15 (1), 306–342.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606