SFeDu

Narratives and understanding of economic institutions


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 18 (no. 2),

The increasing popularity of narrative analysis can be partly explained by ubiquity and accessibility of narratives for the economists. Important role of narratives in identifying behavioral patterns and understanding socio-economic phenomena is another feature of the narrative research. The narratives can provide valuable information for a more detailed overview of the economic development and prospective institutional change. Within the framework of the narrative economics narrative research is still not commonly associated with the institutional research. This article treats narratives as an important source of data and knowledge about relevant institutions. Narrative analysis provides a new, deeper understanding of institutions and their role in shaping social and economic interactions. Stories do not simply uncover evidence relying on the actors’ personal experiences and subjective perceptions. It can be said that the stories “wrap up” the ideas (morality) related to structuring repeated social interactions. Therefore, the narrative structure, as well as the essential elements of meaning, actually matter for explaining economic phenomena. Within the framework of this research, the narrative structure is suggested as including three elements: ideas (morality), context (historical, cultural, and social), and actor. Being closely tied to institutions, narratives can be treated as the scenarios that are consistent with outstanding events and thorough explanation of socio-economic phenomena. This research uses the narrative approach to analyze the in-depth interviews and to identify and explain the institutional traps in the field of education and science.
Citation: Volchik, V. V. (2020). Narratives and understanding of economic institutions. Terra Economicus, 18(2), 49–69. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-49-69
Acknowledgment: This publication has been prepared in the framework of the project funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project № 18-01000581) “Institutional traps of optimization of the sphere of education and science”.


Keywords: institutional economics; narrative economics; behavioral patterns; institutional traps; education and science

JEL codes:

References:
  • Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881
  • Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2002). Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education. Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (4), 1167–1201. https://doi. org/10.1257/.40.4.1167
  • Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2005). Identity and the Economics of Organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147930
  • Akerlof, G. A., Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.
  • Akerlof, G. A., Snower, D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 58–71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.021
  • Alexandrov, Y. I., Krylov, A. K., Arutyunova, K. R. (2017). Activity during learning and the nonlinear differentiation of experience. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21 (4), 391–406.
  • Amable, B. (2000). Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy, 7 (4), 645–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922900750034572
  • Arthur, W. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. American Economic Review, 84 (2), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117868
  • Baker, R. et al. (2016). Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Nonprobability Sampling, June
  • 2013. Moscow: The Public Opinion Foundation Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Balatsky, E. (2008). Dissertation trap. Svobodnaya Mysl, 21 (2), 92–104. (In Russian).
  • Berger, P., Luckman, T. (1995). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Medium Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2010). New Forms of Complementarity in Science. Minerva, 48 (4), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9159-6
  • Borins, S., Herst, B. (2018). Negotiating Business Narratives: Fables of the Information Technology, Automobile Manufacturing, and Financial Trading Industries. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77923-2
  • Coase, R. (2007). Industrial organization: A proposal for research, pp. 58–73 / In: Coase, R. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Мoscow: Novoe izdatelstvo Publ., 224 p.
  • Commons, J. R. (1934). Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy, 2 vols. New Brunswick and London: Transactions Publishers (Reprinted in 1990).
  • Commons, J. R. (1990). Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy. Routledge.
  • https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788455, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788462 Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Sage.
  • Dawson, P. (2020). Hashtag narrative: Emergent storytelling and affective publics in the digital age. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 136787792092141. https://doi. org/10.1177/1367877920921417
  • Hayek, F. A. (2013). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. London: Routledge. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9780203734001
  • Herrmann-Pillath, C., Bau Macedo, L. O. (2019). Narratives and economic policy: Theoretical explorations and the Brazilian case. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3404023
  • Hodgson, G. M. (1997). The ubiquity of habits and rules. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21 (6), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013692
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27 (2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/ cje/27.2.159
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2004). Reclaiming habit for institutional economics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25 (5), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.03.001
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2007). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream?
  • Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4 (1), 7–25.
  • Holmes, D. R. (2019). Markets are a function of language: Notes on a narrative economics. Economics Discussion Papers № 2019-18.
  • Keynes, J. M. (2007). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Classic economic thought. Moscow: Eksmo-Press. (In Russian.)
  • Kranton, R. E. (2016). Identity economics 2016: Where do social distinctions and norms come from? American Economic Review, 106 (5), 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1257/ aer.p20161038
  • Kvale, S. (2003). Researching interview. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Mirowski, P., Nik-Khah, E. (2017). The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270056.001.0001
  • Mirowski, Ph. (1984). Physics and the «marginalist revolution». Cambridge Journal of Economics, (8), 361–379.
  • Mises, L. (2005). Human Action: A Treatise on Economic Theory. Moscow.
  • Mukand, S., Rodrik, D. (2018). The Political Economy of Ideas: On Ideas Versus Interests in Policymaking. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/ w24467
  • North, D. C. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World Development, 17 (9), 1319–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90075-2
  • North, D., Wallis, J. J., Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nureev, R., Volchik, V., Strielkowski, W. (2020). Neoliberal Reforms in Higher Education and the Import of Institutions. Social Sciences, 9 (5), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050079
  • Polanyi, K. (2002). Economics as an institutionalized process. Economic Sociology, 3 (2), 62–73. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. (1999). Institutional traps and economic reforms. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 35 (2), 3–20. (In Russian.)
  • Sacco, P. L. (2020). ‘There are more things in heaven and earth…’ A ‘narrative turn’ in economics? Journal of Cultural Economics, 44 (1), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10824-020-09377-1
  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Simon and Schuster, 134–135.
  • Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative Economics. American Economic Review, 107 (4), 967–1004. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.107.4.967
  • Shiller, R. J. (2019a). Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41 (3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.015
  • Shiller, R. J. (2019b). Narrative Economics. Princeton University Press. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctvdf0jm5
  • Simon, H. (2004). Sciences of the Artificial. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Strambach, S., Pflitsch, G. (2020). Transition topology: Capturing institutional dynamics in regional development paths to sustainability. Research Policy, 49 (7), 104006. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104006
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2019). Ideas, narratives and economic change. Terra Economicus, 17 (1), 24–40. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-1-24-40
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2020). Narrative analysis in economics as climbing complexity. Voprosy
  • Ekonomiki, (4), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-4-5-30 (In Russian.)
  • van Dijk, T. (2013). Discourse and Power: Representation of Domination in Language and Communication. Moscow: Librokom Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Veblen, T. (1992). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315135373
  • Volchik, V. V. Culture, behavioral patterns and inductive reasoning. Journal of Institutional Studies, 8 (4), 28–39. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.4.028-039 (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V. V., Maslyukova, E. V. (2018). Narratives, ideas and institutions. Terra Economicus, 16 (2), 150–168. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-2-150-168 (In Russian.)
  • Volchik, V., Koryttsev, M., Maslyukova, E. (2019). Institutions and ideology of managerialism in higher education and science. Upravlenets, 10 (6), 15–27. DOI: 10.29141/22185003-2019-10-6-2 (In Russian.)
  • Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press. DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226196503.001.0001
  • Yefimov, V. M. (2016). Economic Science in Question. Another Methodology, History and Research Practice. Moscow: Kurs, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Zhuk, A. A., Fursa, E. V. (2019). Narrative analysis of institutional traps of education and science in Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies, 11 (1), 176–193. DOI: 10.17835/20766297.2019.11.1.176-193 (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606