• Home
  • Issues
  • 2018
  • No 4
  • Institutional design and theory of reforms in russian economic discourse


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 4),

The article presents the results of the analysis of publications of Russianspeaking researchers devoted to the institutional design issues. Steady and widely used in the work of English-speaking economists, representatives of institutional and neoinstitutional directions, the concept, however, is used in Russian as a rule in political science research, but not at the economic area. However, the analysis has shown that in the Russian-speaking scientific space one can find a vast layer of works in which there are points of contact between institutional, neoinstitutional theory and the theory of reforms. They develop recommendatory concepts for the selection of correct reform strategies, the implementation of which will minimize risks in the conduct of institutional reforms and maximize the possible positive effects from the introduction of new institutions. Part of the research examines the negative consequences of choosing wrong strategies for implementing reforms. This becomes the basis for several concepts, such as «institutional traps», the concept of «misuse of institutions» and institutional dissonances. All three concepts describe similar phenomena, the reason of which is the discrepancy of the institutions that are borrowed, which are implanted in the established institutional environment, provokes an increase in social costs or results in inefficient equilibrium. In conclusion, the concepts of second-best institutions and institutional corridors are considered as theoretical grounds for minimizing the negative effects of institutional design.

Keywords: institutional design; institutions; theory of reform; meso level of economic analysis; institutional theory; civil culture

  • Alekseeva, L. V., Nikonova, T. V. and Yusupova, L. M. (2014). Institutional Traps of Human Capital Consumption: Public Goods Production Problems. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(24), 131–136.
  • Auzan, A. A. (2017). Second-best institutions. Why is it impossible to build all at once in Russia? Carnegie Moscow Center web-site. (https://carnegie.ru/commentary/73216 – Access Date: 17.08.2018). (In Russian.)
  • Auzan, A. A. and Nikishina, E. N. (2013). Economic dynamics in the long run: the role of informal institutions. Journal of Economic Theory, (4), 48–57. (In Russian.)
  • Bagdasarian, I. S. and Mironova, E. S. (2017). Import of institutes in the Russian economy. Postulat, (2). (http://e-postulat.ru/index.php/Postulat/article/view/387 – Access Date: 08.06.2018). (In Russian.)
  • Center for Strategic Research (2017). Sociocultural factors of innovative development and successful implementation of reforms. (https://csr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ Report-SF.pdf – Access Date: 17.08.2018). (In Russian.)
  • Chong, A. and Gradstein, M. (2018). Imposed institutions and preferences for redistribution. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(1), 127–156.
  • Dubova, Y., Dugina, T., Korabelnikov, I., Gornostaeva, Z. and Alekhina, E. (2017). Institutional Traps as Barriers for Development of Regions’ Marketing Activities / In: E. G. Popkova (ed.) Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management. Springer International Publishing AG.
  • Gareev, T. R. (2010). Institutions and economic development at the sub-regional (meso-) level. Social sciences and modernity, (5), 45–58. (In Russian.)
  • Gradstein, M. (2008). Institutional traps and economic growth. International Economic Review, 49(3), 1043–1066.
  • How to change the configuration of power in Russia? Round Table (1999). Polis. Political Studies, (4), 70–92. (In Russian.)
  • Kamko, E. V. and Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. (2018). Institutional structure of the Russian national innovative system: path dependence – effect. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 12(1), 149–160. (In Russian.)
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2001). Institutional matrices and development of Russia. Novosibirsk: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the RAS. (In Russian.)
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2011). Institutional changes and the Curie principle. Economics of Contemporary Russia, (1), 19–38. (In Russian.)
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2014). Institutional matrices and development of Russia. Introduction into Х-Y-theory. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russian.)
  • Kirdina-Chandler, S. (2017). The Meso Level: A New Look at Economics? Working paper. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Kleiner, G. B. (2005). Modernization of the economy and the «cultivation» of institutions: a view «from below» / In: Modernization of the economy and the cultivation of institutions, Book 1. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. (2006). Institutional design: Changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review March, 8(1), 141–160.
  • Kouzminov, Ya., Radaev, V., Yakovlev, A. and Yasin, E. (2005). Institutions: From import to raising. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (5), 5–27. (In Russian.)
  • Kuznetsov, I. I. (2016). Institutional design of the Russian authority: The influence of external factors on the formation of government. Political science, (5), 227–244. (In Russian.)
  • Mau, V. A., Yanovsky, K. E. and others (2003). Imported institutions in countries with economies in transition: efficiency and costs. Scientific Works of IET 68P. Moscow: Institute for the Economy in Transition, 234 p. (In Russian.)
  • Nikishina, E. N. (2016). The Effects of Culture on Transaction Costs and Competitive Advantages of the Society. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 11(1), 105–120. (In Russian.)
  • Oleinik, A. N. (2002). Institutional Economics: Textbook. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian.)
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actions. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Polishchuk, L. (2008). Misuse of Institutions: Causes and Consequences. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), 28–44. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. (2000). Institutional traps / In: L. R. Klein and M. Pomer (eds.) The New Russia: Transition Gone Awry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Polterovich, V. M. (1999). Institutional traps and economic reforms. Economics and mathematical methods, 35(2), 3–20. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2001). Economic institutions transplantation. Economic Science of Contemporary Russia, (3), 24–50. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2004). Institutional traps: How to get out? Social Sciences and modernity, (3), 5–16. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2007). Institutional Reform Strategies or Art of Reforms: Working paper WP10/ 2007/08. Moscow: State University – Higher School of Economics. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2008b). The current state of the theory of economic reforms. Economics of Modern Russia, (1), 7–34.
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2016). Institutions of catching-up development (on the project of a new model for economic development of Russia). Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, (5), 34–56. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2017a). Institutions of catching-up development and civil culture. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 205(3), 314–328. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2017b). Designing the strategies for socio-economic development: science vs. ideology. Voprosy teoreticheskoj ehkonomiki, (1), 55–65. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. and Starkov, O. Yu. (2006). The problem of transplantation of mortgage institutions in transitional economies: the role of building slopes. Moscow: CEMI RAS Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. М. (2005). Towards a Guide for Reformers: Some Conclusions from the Theory of Economic Reforms. Economic Science of Contemporary Russia, (1), 7–25. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. М. (2006). Strategies for institutional reforms. China and Russia. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 42(2), 3–16. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. М. (2008a). The Current State of the Theory of Economic Reforms. Spatial Economics, 2, pp. 6–45. (In Russian.)
  • Popov, E. V. (2015). Ideas and principles of multicultural institutional modeling. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series of Economics and Law. 25(6-2), 8–18. (In Russian.)
  • Popov, E. V. and Sokolov, G. M. (2017). Institutional Corridor of Land Relations Development. Izvestiya of the Ural State University of Economics, (3), 5–18. (In Russian.)
  • Rodrik, D. (2008). Second-best Institutions. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceeding, 98(2), 100–104.
  • Searle, J. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1–22.
  • Sokolov, G. M. (2017). System of categories for the analysis of land relations. Journal of Economic Theory, (1), 165–168. (In Russian.)
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2008). Basics of institutional design. Moscow: Economic Faculty of Moscow State University Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Vernikov, A. V. (2018). Non-purpose use of the Institution on the example of bank deposit insurance in Russia. Banking, (6), 34–39. (In Russian.)
  • Voigt, S. (2018). How to measure informal institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(1), 1–22.
  • Volchik, V. V. (2012). Evolutionary approach to the analysis of institutional changes. Terra economicus, 10(4), 62–69. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606