• Home
  • Issues
  • 2018
  • No 4
  • Innovation activities and the impact of investment in r&d on economic growth: assessment and modelling


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 4),

New approaches to the role of innovation activities in the context of contemporary challenges of economic growth, as well as the needs and possibilities to improve the assessment and modelling of the impact of investment into the research and development (R&D) on economic growth are presented in this publication. The main attention is focused on the processes of innovation activities and economic growth in the European Union, as well as on the goals that are formulated in the Strategy “Europe 2020” and in other documents of the European Union. The peculiarities of the application of various indicators and indices are disclosed, in particular, taking into account the needs for developing and substantiating economic policy decisions. New aspects of the application of various innovation indexes, such as Global Innovation Index, EU Innovation Scoreboard, Competitive Industrial Performance Index, Global Competitiveness Index, Knowledge Economy Index and Innovation Capacity Index, are presented. A new method of the assessment and modelling of the impact of the investment into the R & D on economic growth is proposed and described.

Keywords: Europe 2020; European Union; economic growth; investment in R&D; innovation activities

  • Appiah, K. M., Possumah, B. T., Ahmat, N., and Sanusi, N. A. (2018). External Environment and SMEs Investment in The Ghanaian Oil and Gas Sector // Economics and Sociology, 11(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-1/8
  • Benešová, D., Kubičková, V., Michálková, A., and Krošláková, M. (2018). Innovation activities of gazelles in business services as a factor of sustainable growth in the Slovak Republic // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 452–466. https://doi. org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(3)
  • Čábelková, I., and Strielkowski, W. (2013). Is the level of taxation a product of culture? A cultural economics approach // Society and Economy, 35(4), 513–529. https://doi. org/10.1556/SocEc.2013.0007
  • Carayannis, E. G., and Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Using multiobjective mathematical programming to link national competitiveness, productivity, and innovation // Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 635–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1873-x
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press (https://hbr.org/product/ open-innovation-the-new-imperative-for-creating-and-profiting-from-technology/8377- HBK-ENG).
  • Cunningham, J. A., and Link, A. N. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of research and innovation policies among European Union countries // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0394-7
  • De Propris, L. (2013). How are the Creative Industries Weathering the Crisis? // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/ rss025
  • Ehrenberger, M., Koudelkova, P., and Strielkowski, W. (2015). Factors influencing innovation in small and medium enterprises in the Czech Republic // Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7737
  • Europe 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Communication from the Commission, European Commission, COM(2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 3.3.2010 (http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20 -%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf).
  • European Commission (2011). Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union (https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/feb8c03e-523f4437-9aa0-d27e71fe582c/language-en).
  • European Commission (2017). European Union Scoreboard 2017 file:///C:/Users/Rolandas/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/ Downloads/170727_EIS2017%20(1).pdf
  • Eurostat (2018). Eurostat database (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database).
  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter (https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/12880642).
  • Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., and Sokolov, A. (2016). Foresight: Turning challenges into opportunities, pp. 1–8 / In: L. Gokhberg, D. Meissner, and A. Sokolov (eds.) Deploying foresight for policy and strategy makers. Creating opportunities through public policies and corporate strategies in science, technology and innovation. Heidelberg: Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25628-3_1
  • Hollanders, H., and van Cruysen, A. (2008). Rethinking the European Innovation Scoreboard: A new methodology for 2008–2010 // INNO Metrics Thematic Paper, European Commission, Brussels (http://es.eustat.eus/elementos/ele0006100/ti_methodology-reporteis-2008-2010/inf0006199_c.pdf).
  • Janda, K., Rausser, G., and Strielkowski, W. (2013). Determinants of profitability of Polish rural micro-enterprises at the time of EU Accession // Eastern European Countryside, 19, 177–217. https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2013-0009
  • Jang, Y., Ko, Y., and So Young Kim, S., Y. (2016). Cultural correlates of national innovative capacity: a cross-national analysis of national culture and innovation rates // Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 33–43. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40852-016-0048-6
  • Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jędrych, A., and Mroczek-Dąbrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Pola d and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index // Comparative Economic Research, 20(3), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0021
  • Kalyugina, S., Strielkowski, W., Ushvitsky, L., and Astachova, E. (2015). Sustainable and secure development: facet of personal financial issues // Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 5(2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.2(14)
  • Kashintseva, V., Strielkowski, W., Streimikis, J., and Veynbender, T. (2018). Consumer Attitudes towards Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage Products and Technologies // Energies, 11(10), 2787. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102787
  • Kiseľáková, D., Šofranková, B., Čabinová, V., and Onuferová, E. (2018). Competitiveness and sustainable growth analysis of the EU countries with the use of Global Indexes’ methodology // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 581–599. https://doi. org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(13)
  • Koudelková, P., Strielkowski, W., and Hejlová, D. (2015). Corruption and system change in the Czech Republic: Firm-level evidence // DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 6(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0002
  • Lisin, E., & Strielkowski, W. (2014). Modelling new economic approaches for the wholesale energy markets in Russia and the EU. Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(2B), 566–580.
  • Lisin, E., Rogalev, A., Strielkowski, W., and Komarov, I. (2015). Sustainable modernization of the Russian power utilities industry. Sustainability, 7(9), 11378–11400. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3390/su70911378
  • Lisin, E., Sobolev, A., Strielkowski, W., and Garanin, I. (2016). Thermal efficiency of cogeneration units with multi-stage reheating for Russian municipal heating systems // Energies, 9(4), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9040269
  • Lisin, E., Strielkowski, W., Chernova, V., and Fomina, A. (2018). Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration // Energies, 11(12), 3284. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123284
  • Lundvall, B.-A. (1998). Why study national systems of innovations and national styles of innovation // Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(4), 407–421. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524324
  • Meissner, D., Polt, W., and Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Towards a broad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy // The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1184–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9485-4
  • Mir-Babayev, R., Gulaliyev, M., Shikhaliyeva, S., Azizova, R., and Ok, N. (2017). The Impact of Cultural Diversity on Innovation Performance: Evidence from Construction Industry of Azerbaijan // Economics and Sociology, 10(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2017/10-1/6
  • Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Newbery, D., Pollitt, M., Ritz, R., and Strielkowski, W. (2018). Market design for a highrenewables European electricity system // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.025
  • OECD (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Oslo Manual (http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2367580.pdf).
  • OECD (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264239012-en
  • Oganisjana, K., Svirina, A., Surikova, S., Grīnberga-Zālīte, G., and Kozlovskis, K. (2017). Engaging universities in social innovation research for understanding sustainability issues // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.9770/ jesi.2017.5.1(1)
  • Radwan, A. (2018). Science and innovation policies in North African Countries: Exploring challenges and opportunities // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(17)
  • Schumpeter, J. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.187354/page/n1
  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin (https://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/Schumpeter,%20Capitalism,%20Socialism%20and%20Democracy.pdf).
  • Strazdas, R., Černevičiūtė, J., and Jančoras, Ž. (2014). Dynamics of the understanding of innovation in the context of the development of traditional and creative industries // Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(2A), 42–59.
  • Štreimikienė, D., Strielkowski, W., Bilan, Y., and Mikalauskas, I. (2016). Energy dependency and sustainable regional development in the Baltic states: A review // Geographica Pannonica, 20(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1602079S
  • Strielkowski, W., and Čábelková, I. (2015). Religion, culture, and tax evasion: Evidence from the Czech Republic // Religions, 6(2), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020657
  • Svagzdiene, B., and Kuklyte, J. (2016). The analysis of factors which have impact for summary innovation index in Germany, Estonia and Lithuania // Transformation in Business & Economics, 15(2B), 784–799.
  • The World Bank (2018). The World Bank database (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator).
  • Vilys, M., Jakubavičius, A., and Žemaitis, E. (2015). Public Innovation Support Index for Impact Assessment in the European Economic Area // Entrepreneurial Business & Economics Review, 3(4), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2015.030408
  • Żelazny, R. (2017). Determinants and measurement of smart growth: evidence from Poland // Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 34–45. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/2
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606