SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

GEO-ECONOMICS IN INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH SYSTEM

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 4),

Globalization and economic integration make it increasingly important to explore the issues that address emerging economic challenges within an interdisciplinary research framework, paying attention to geo-economic context. Economic concepts are therefore need to be revised. Since comparative advantage in international trade became a key factor in international economic relations, geoeconomics as a new form of scientific analysis have emerged. Being an important part of scientific discourse with great theoretical and practical implications, geoeconmics combines methodologies of economics, policy research, regional studies and economic geography. In-depth understanding and explanation of the ongoing transformations can be treated as referring to both practical and theoretical experiences, at that. Traditional economic concepts of competition, ownership, corporations gain renewed value when used within the methodological framework of geoeconomics. These concepts are rather seen as the determinants of relationships between national economies and global economic processes. Level of competitiveness of economically, technologically and innovatively developed countries significantly influences the features of a world economy. Ownership and corporate governance are increasingly treated as the regulatory institutions for the global economy.


Keywords: geoeconomics; geo-economic space; methodology of geo-economics; spatial balance; globalization; integration

References:
  • Agnew, J. (2002). Making political geography. London: Arnold
  • Chernaya, I. P. (2018). Geoeconomic factors of development of economic cycles in the modern era. Customs policy of Russia in the Far East, (2), 15–24. (In Russian.)
  • Christaller, W. (1955). Beiträge zu einer Geographie des Fremdenverkehrs (s. 1–19) / In: Erdkunde, Bd. 9. Bonn.
  • Christaller, W. (1964). Some Considerations of Tourism Location in Europe (pp. 95–105) / In: Papers, Regional Science Association, (12).
  • Corbwdge, S. (1993). Debt and Development. Oxford: Blackwell
  • Coks, H. (1995). Worldly hail: secularization and urbanization in theological aspect. Moscow: Oriental Literature, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 263 p. (In Russian.)
  • Dicken, P. (1992). Global shift. London: Paul Chapman, XVI, 496 p.
  • Florida, R. (2011). Creative class: people who change the future. Moscow: Klassika-XXI, 421 p. (In Russian.)
  • Gladky, Yu. N. and Pisarenko, S. V. (2013). «Geopolitical construction» and «geopolitical potential» – the basic concepts of geopolitics. News of the Russian State Pedagogical University after A.I. Herzen, (154), 129–137. (In Russian.)
  • Glaeser, E. (2015). Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. Penguin Books.
  • Kaplan, R. D. (2012). The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. Random House Publishing Group.
  • Kochetov, E. G. (1999). Geoeconomics (development of the world economic space). Moscow: BEK Publ., 480 p. (In Russian.)
  • Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2).
  • Kuznetsova, A. V. (2010). Features of the manifestation of a unified humanitarian paradigm (geoculture, geoeconomics, geopolitics) in the study of modern world politics. Security of Eurasia, 2(40), 461–472. (In Russian.)
  • Lachinsky, S. S. (2011). Modern directions of geoeconomic research in Russia.News of the Russian Geographical Society, 143(1), 18–27. (In Russian.)
  • Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geoeconomics, Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, (20), 17–24.
  • Mamedov, O. Y., Ishchenko-Padukova, O. A. and Movchan, I. V. (2013). Economic specifics of peripheral regions of the southern Russia. Journal of economic regulation, 4(4), 23–33. (In Russian.)
  • Massey, D. B. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. New York: Methuen
  • O’Brien, R. (1992). Global Financial Integration: the Death of Geography. Council on Foreign Relations Press.
  • Ryerson, R. A. and Aronoff, S. (2010). Why ‘Where’ Matters: Understanding and Profiting from GPS, GIS and Remote Sensing. Ottawa, Canada: Kim Geomatics Corporation.
  • Soilen, S. K. (2012). Geoeconomics. London: Bookboon.
  • Strygin, A. V. (2015). Geoeconomics: from the method of knowledge to the method of action. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Economics, (2), 7–13. (In Russian.)
  • Tarasyuk, V. M. (2008). Trends in the territorial development of Russia. Internal geoeconomics. State power and local self-government, (5), 20–23. (In Russian.)
  • Vakhrusheva, M. A. (2009). Geoeconomics as the new economic policy. Vyatka Medical Journal, (1), 134–136. (In Russian.)
  • Weber, A. (1926). Theory of industry placement. The problem of industrial standard. Moscow. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606