SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2017
  • No 1
  • The impact of Brexit on labour migration and labour markets in the United Kingdom and the EU

The impact of Brexit on labour migration and labour markets in the United Kingdom and the EU

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 15 (no. 1),

Nowadays, migration to the United Kingdom remains to be one of the most debatable issues as far as the Brexit is concerned. Many speculations have been made regarding the impact of Brexit and its effect on the social and economic status of the UK. Even though the issue has been deeply explored and analyzed, the implications of the nation’s withdrawal from the European Union still remains to be uncertain. The only sure thing is that such a drastic move will have profound repercussions as far as movement and settlement on the UK is concerned. Our paper seeks to examine the impact of Brexit on migration in the United Kingdom using the example of Polish migrants. We examine the recent trends and development and elaborate on the future of EU migrants in the UK and UK citizens residing in the EU (which might be about 3 million people on both sides of the spectrum). Moreover, we discuss possible scenarios of UK migration policies after the country will eventually leave the EU in a few years, and assess the impact of immigration to the UK on the British and European economies.


Keywords: labour migration; immigration; labour market; Brexit; United Kingdom; European Union

References:
  • Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., and West, J. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Doing Business 2007–2016 (http://www.doingbusiness.org/ – Access date 20.01.2017).
  • Global Competitiveness Index 2007–2016 (http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/ – Access date 21.01.2017).
  • Global Innovation Index 2007–2016 (https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/ – Access date 20.01.2017).
  • Golov, R. S. 2009. Innovative way as an essential condition for sustainable development of Russia / In: Innovative way of development of the Russian Federation as an essential condition for overcoming the global financial and economic crisis: Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference on April 21–22, 2009 meeting of the section, vol. 1. Moscow: Finance and economic institute of correspondence education Publ., 396 p. (In Russian.)
  • Govindarajan, V., and Trimble, C. 2012. Reverse Innovation: create far from home, win everywhere. Harvard Business School Press, 275 p.
  • Javed, N. 2017. Innovators: Are You Smart Enough For 2017? Innovation Management, Column & Opinion, January 20 (http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2017/01/20/innovators-are-you-smart-enough-for-2017/ – Access date 22.01.2017).
  • Mau, V. A., and Kuzminov, Y. I. (eds.) 2013. Strategy 2020: New Growth Model – a new social policy. The final report on the results of expert work on topical issues of socio-economic strategy of Russia for the period up to 2020, book 1; Moscow: Publishing House “Delo”, RANEPA, 430 p. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R. (ed.) 2017. Economic sanctions against Russia: expectations and reality. Moscow: KNORUS. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R. 2012. On the way to understanding the nature of institutional innovation. Institutional Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, 4–10. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R., and Simakovsky, S. 2016. Innovation potential of Russia in the conditions of economic sanctions: the growth of reserves. Journal of Economic Regulation, no. 4. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev, R., Sokolov, D., and Akhmadeev, D. 2016. What is Russia sick of? (Economic diagnosis in light of the large cycles conjuncture) / In: In search of lost growth. II International Forum of Financial University – 2015 (November 24–26, Moscow). Collection of scientific articles, vol. 1. Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian.)
  • OECD. 2005. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual. Prepared by the Working Party of National Experts on Scientific and Technology Indicators. Paris: OECD.
  • Ovchinnikov, V., and Ketova, N. 2016. System effect of the interaction of innovative potential and the institutional environment in the region. The region’s economy, vol. 12, no. 2, 537–546. (In Russian.)
  • Polyanskaya, N., and Naydanova, E. 2015. The role of innovation in the economy of Russia and its regions. Internet magazine “Science of Science”, vol. 7, no. 4 (http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/129EVN415.pdf – Access date 20.01.2017). (In Russian.)
  • Prokin, V. 2014. Management development strategy of innovation demand in the region: a methodological approach. Bulletin of Perm National Research Polythechnical University. Socio-economic sciences, no. 1(22), 96–107. (In Russian.)
  • Qingrui, X., Jin, C., Zhangshu, X., Jingjiang, L., Gang, Z., and Yong, W. 2007. Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century. Journal of Technol. Transfer, 32, 9–25.
  • Schumpeter, J. 1982. The Theory of Economic Development (study of business profits, capital, interest and conditions of the cycle). Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1912. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Industry and Innovation, vol. 9.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York Toronto London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • The attractiveness of regions of Russia: investment and innovation. 2016. JSC “Rosinfocominvest”. (In Russian.)
  • The national report on innovation in Russia in 2015.(In Russian.)
  • Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., and de Rochemont, M. 2009. Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, vol. 29, no. 6–7, 423–437.
  • Wong, S. K. S. 2012. The role of management involvement in innovation. Management Decision, vol. 51, no. 4, 709–729.
  • World Bank Russia Economic Report. 2016a. no. 35.
  • World Bank Russia Economic Report. 2016b. no. 36.
  • Yashin, Ye. G., and Murashova, N. A. 2010. Some aspects of the development of control technology innovation enterprise. Proceedings of the Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R. E. Alekseev, no. 2 (81). (In Russian.)
  • Zaitsevа, A., and Shuvalovа, О. 2011. The new emphasis in the development of innovation: innovation, initiated by users. Foresight, vol. 5, no. 2, 16–32. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606