SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2015
  • No 2
  • Political components of methodological individualism illustrated by an example of formation of the national innovative system

Political components of methodological individualism illustrated by an example of formation of the national innovative system

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 13 (no. 2),
p. 84-94

The paper presents an illustration of the thesis that economic science cannot exist without the political/ideological background, with reference to liberally focused direction of economic thought an example of the development of the Russian national innovative system in a context of the European research space. The author asserts that conflicts of interests between the households, state and enterprises are often caused by distinctions in the paradigms of technological civilization, tradition, shaping ecotechnological civilization and arising biological civilization. The solution can be found by developing the bases for ecotechnological civilization, first of all methodological foundations, using methodological individualism, accompanied by alternative concepts.


Keywords: methodological individualism; science and technology policy; research space; ecotechnological civilization

References:
  • Bases of the policy of the Russian Federation in the field of development of a science and technologies for the period till 2010 and the further prospect. On March, 30th, 2002. Pr-576. (In Russian.)
  • Challenges for the European science and technology policy (2013). The summary abstract. Abstract journal INION of the Russian Academy of Sciences, GRNTI 12, series «Naukovedenie», Social and the humanities, the domestic and foreign literature, series 8, no. 4, pp. 95–115. (In Russian.)
  • Mamedov O.Yu. (2013). The European liberalism and the Russian economy – drama of unrequited love? Теrrа Economicus, vol. 11, № 4, pp. 6–11. (In Russian.)
  • Pyastolov S.M. (2012). Efficiency of national innovative system: infrastructural aspect. Transport business in Russia, № 6, p. 1 (103), pp. 18–20. (In Russian.)
  • Pyjastolov S.M. (2014). Rationality within the limits of Tradition. Materials of the Second international scientifically-practical conference on May, 15–17th, 2014, pp. 55–65. (In Russian.)
  • Science indicators: 2014: the statistical collection (2014). Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics. (In Russian.)
  • Stalin I.V. (1952). Economic problems of socialism in the USSR. Мoscow: the State publishing house of the political literature. (In Russian.)
  • State program of the Russian Federation «Development of science and technologies» for 2013–2020. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation from December, 20th, 2012 № 2433-r. (In Russian.)
  • Stepin V.S. (ed.) (2010). The new philosophical encyclopaedia, in 4 vol. Мoscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Strategy of national safety of the Russian Federation till 2020. The decree of the President of the Russian Federation from 5/12/2009 N 537, item 70. (In Russian.)
  • The concept of the long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation for the period till 2020. The Government of the Russian Federation from 11/17/2008 N 1662-r. (In Russian.)
  • The military doctrine of the Russian Federation. Signing date: 12/25/2014. (In Russian.)
  • Velichko M.V., Efimov V.V. and Imanov G..M. (2012). Economy and the noosphere. Scientificallymethodological bases of the government social and economic development under the conditions of globalization. Ethics and ecological approach. St.-Petersburg: Smolnyj Russian Open Society institute, chair Psychology, Akmeology, noospherology and pedagogics. MFIN Publishing House. (In Russian.)
  • Dutta S. and Lanvin B. (eds.) (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. INSEAD, WIPO.
  • EUROPE 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Communication from the Commission, COM (2010) 2020.
  • Henriques L. and Laredo P. (2013). Policy-making in science policy: The «OECD model» unveiled // Research Policy, № 42, pp. 801–816.
  • Hirschman A. (1981). Essays in trespassing: economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krugman P. (1995). Incidents from my Career / In: Heertje A. (ed.) The Makers of Modern Economics, vol. 2. Aldershot: Elgar, pp. 29-46.
  • Kurakov L.P. and Pyastolov S.M. (2014). Issues of political strategy in developing innovation systems. Archiv EuroEco, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–59.
  • Nedeva M. (2013). Between the global and the national: Organising European science. Research Policy, № 42, pp. 220–230.
  • Sharif N. (2006). Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Research Policy, № 35, pp. 745–766.
  • Van Den Hove S., Mcglad J., Mottet P. and Depledge M.H. (2012). The Innovation Union: a perfect means to confused ends? Еnvironmental science & policy, № 16, pp. 73–80.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606