SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2015
  • No 1
  • Institutional and economic circumstances squeezing small business out of Russia’s formal economy

Institutional and economic circumstances squeezing small business out of Russia’s formal economy

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 13 (no. 1),
p. 61-72

The authors use the theory of transaction costs and parts of the economic theory of crime and punishment to gain an insight into why small and medium-scale business in Russia tends to operate outside the formal sector of the country’s economy. A detailed classification of legitimate and illegitimate costs is given, assessing each legitimate cost as a cost to be shaken-off by going into the shadow economy. It is argued that each business possesses an innate ability to find its optimum degree of legitimacy, which depends on its institutional and economic circumstances. The authors treat the existence of this ability as an objective economic law. The empirical data support the view that Russia’s institutional and economic environment stays unchanged in that it pushes small business activity into the informal sector. The data presented also illustrate the vast scope of informal small and medium-scale business activity in Russia. The authors propose a set of priority measures to combat economic crime in the small business sector.


Keywords: small business; small and medium enterprises; underground economy; transaction costs; shadow income; corruption; taxes

References:
  • Avdiyskiy V.I. andDadalko V.А.(2012). Shadow economy and economic security of the state. Moscow: Alfa-М: INFRA-М. (In Russian.)
  • Bekker G.(2000). Crime and Punishment: an economic approach. Origins [Istoki], vol. 4, pp. 28–90. (In Russian.)
  • Burov V.(Undated). SMEs’illegal performance. Higher School of Economics, Management and Entrepreneurship (http://vseup.ru/static/files/Monografiya_Germaniya.doc, accessed on: 14.08.2014). (In Russian.)
  • Coase R.(2001). The Nature of the Firm / In: Williamson О. andWinter S. (eds.)The Nature of the Firm: To the 50th anniversary of the R. Coase’s «The Nature of the Firm». Moscow: Delo Publ. (In Russian.)
  • De SotoH.(1995). The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. Moscow: Catallaxy. (In Russian.)
  • Ivanov P.I. (ed.) (2011). Fight against tax crimes and corruption. Theory and practice [Borba s nalogovoi I korruptsionnoi prestupnostiyu. Voprosy teorii I praktiki]. Moscow: UNITY-DANA Publ.(In Russian.)
  • Kondratieva Е.А. (2013). Shadow processes, state and corruption. The Russian entrepreneurship [Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo], no. 12 (234), pp. 145–155. (In Russian.)
  • Maiburova I.А., Kireenko I.P. andIvanova Yu.B. (eds.) (2013). Tax evasion. Problems and solutions. Moscow: UNITY-DANA Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Verbitskiy А.(2008). Help SMEs, and SMEs will help the country. Saint-Petersburg law portal (http://ppt.ru/news/53872, accessed on: 18.06.2013). (In Russian.)
  • Vishnevskiy V. andVetkin А.(2004). Tax evasion and taxpayer’s rational choice. Voprosy economiki, no. 2, pp. 96–108. (In Russian.)
  • Allingham M. andSandmo A.(1991). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis / In: Atkinson A.B. (ed.)Modern Public Finance, vol. I. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 50–65.
  • Landsberger M.and Meilijson I.(1982). Incentive Generating State Dependent Penalty System: The Case of Income Tax Evasion. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 19, pp. 333–352.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606