• Home
  • Issues
  • 2015
  • No 3
  • Economy of the gothic period (to the 140th anniversary of the «Critique of the gotha programme» by K. Marx)

Economy of the gothic period (to the 140th anniversary of the «Critique of the gotha programme» by K. Marx)

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 13 (no. 3),

In spring 1875, a treasure of theoretical thought, a critical review of the draft programme of the United Workers’ Party of Germany, «Critique of the Gotha Programme» by Karl Marx, had enriched the political economy science. However, only 16 years after the public became acquainted with the «Critique of the Gotha Programme»: it was published by Engels in 1891 in «Die Neue Zeit» – German socialist theoretical journal of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. The author attracts the readers’ attention to those aspects of Marx’s work which are relevant in context of processes taking place in modern society. The socialist system of higher education has been thoroughly ideological, as, indeed, all the coordinates of Soviet life. It ruined, after all, higher education, as well as the Soviet society. But «the ideological Guinness record » took place: there was no a student of those years that didn’t flinch when hearing on Karl Marx’s «Critique of the Gotha Program». Though, if Marx’s work was read, we have fewer problems today. The author focuses on the issues such as relevance of the methodological potential of the work by K. Marx, relation of freedom of society and freedom of state, military-government despotism, failed prophecy and fate of Marx’s «Gothic» ideas in Russia. The author introduces categories of «Gothic society» and «Gothic economy» within the conceptual apparatus of modern social theory, referring to the presence of the characteristic features of which Marx had foreseen in the transition from capitalism to socialism.

Keywords: classical political economy; modern economy; state and civil society

  • Ardashkin V.D. (1992). To the modern concept of the state. News of higher educational institutions. Law, no. 2, pp. 97–99. (In Russian.)
  • Bauman Z.(2002). The Individualized Society. Moscow: Logos. (In Russian.)
  • Belozerov V.К.(2013). State and its alternatives. Problem analysis and governance, vol. 6, no. 4 (30), pp. 109–113. (In Russian.)
  • Blyakhman B.Ya. (2005). The welfare state in world industrial production integration environment. Bulletin of the Kuzbass State Technical University, no. 3, pp. 136–141. (In Russian.)
  • Ilyin М.V. and Коval B.I.(1992). Two sides of the same coin: civil society and the state. Polis. Political Studies, no. 1–2, pp. 193–201. (In Russian.)
  • Kochetkova L.N.(2010). Was the Soviet State social? Social Policy and Sociology, no. 12. (In Russian.)
  • Kolbanovskii V.V.(2012). Social traditions and innovations (historical context, theoretical ap proaches and definitions). Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, no. 4, pp. 1–23. (In Russian.)
  • Kuznetsov V.Е.(2003). State returns? The national interest in the current world situation. International processes [Mezhdunarodnye protsessy], no. 1, pp. 110–115. (In Russian.)
  • Maidanskiy А.(2013). «It wont’ wither away!» Svobodnaya mysl, no. 4 (1640),pp. 171–182. (In Russian.)
  • Makarova М.N. (2005). Working class as an object and a subject of transformations under globaliza tion. Bulletin of Udmurt University, no. 2, pp. 23–38. (In Russian.)
  • Makarova М.N.(2006). Specifics of the working class transformation in the con text of globalization. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. IX, no. 2, pp. 59–67. (In Russian.)
  • Marx К.(1961). Critique of the Gotha Programme / In: Marx К.and Engels F.Works, vol. 19, pp. 9–32. (In Russian.)
  • Orlova I.V.(2006). Civil society theory: on the history of the issue. Philosophy and society [Filosofiya i obchshestvo], no. 2, pp. 132–133. (In Russian.)
  • Sarkisyan Т. (2008). The end of the state or a new form of social organization. XXI century: an informational and analytical journal, vol. 1. (In Russian.)
  • Simashenkov P.D.(2015). The Marxist concept of the state’s withering away and the future of Russian officials. Humanitarian research, no. 3(43), pp. 29–32. (In Russian.)
  • Strelnikov К.А.(2010). The issue of the «state’s withering away »: Marxist theory and modern practice. History of state and law, no. 16, pp. 45–46. (In Russian.)
  • Tarkhanov О.V.(2012). The state: development and metamorphosis. National interests: priorities and security, no. 48, pp. 24–34. (In Russian.)
  • Yankelevich К.А.(2011). How Stalinism strengthened. Russia XXI, no. 2, pp. 128–147. (In Russian.)
  • Internationalist Communist Tendency(2015). The Communist Manifesto of 1875 – The Critique of the Gotha Programme (http://www.leftcom.org/en/articles/2005-11-01/thecommunist-manifesto-of-1875-the-critique-of-the-gotha-proramme).
  • SocialistWorker.org(2012). Marx against the state. International Socialist Organization, March, 23 (http://socialistworker.org/2012/03/23/marx-against-the-state).
  • Verhältnis der Landesregierung zum Werk von Karl Marx(http://www.mi.niedersachsen.de/portal/live.php?article_id=95829&navigation_id=14797&psmand=33).
  • Winn J. (2014). Co-operatives, Socialism and Communism: Marx’s critique of the Gotha programme. Joss Winn, January 22 (http://josswinn.org/2014/01/co-operatives-socialism-and-communism-marxs-critique-of-the-gotha-programme/).
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606