Sociocultural capital in the strategies of managed modernization: Comparative analysis of the Iranian and Turkish models
E.A. PAIN
Doctor of Politics (DSc), Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Management of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, General Director of the Center for Ethnopolitical and Regional Studies, Leading Staff Scientist of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Doctor of Politics (DSc), Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Management of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, General Director of the Center for Ethnopolitical and Regional Studies, Leading Staff Scientist of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2014, Vol. 12 (no. 3),
p. 118-130
Some results of a comparative study of modernization in two Islamic countries, Iran and Turkey, are presented in the article. A number of controversial issues are addressed. Firstly, among the factors impeding modernization the relationship between the role of culture and that of management is considered. In other words, was this the specificity of the Islamic civilization, or rather the quality of the reforms themselves that hindered modernization in a number of Islamic countries largely? Secondly, what was the role that sociocultural and political competencies of society played for successful modernization through radical economic reforms, the author questions. Positive assessment of Ataturk’s reforms in Turkey, on the one hand, and the failure of Iran's White Revolution, on the other hand, are discussed helping the reader answer the questions raised.
Keywords: modernization; traditions; technocracy; Islam; White Revolution; Kemalists; Iran; Turkey
References:
- Dumont L. (2000). Homo Aequalis, I. The Genesis and Triumph of Economic Ideology. Мoscow: NOTA BENE, 240 p. (In Russian.)
- Eisenstadt S. (1999). Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Study of Civilizations. Мoscow: Aspekt-Press. (In Russian.)
- Fadeeva I. (1993). The concept of power in the Middle East. Мoscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian.)
- Kireev N. (2000). Turkish ruling elite metamorphosis. The political elite of the Middle East. Мoscow: The Institute for the Study of Israel in the Middle East, pp. 78–92. (In Russian.)
- Sen А. (2004). Cultural Liberty and Human Development. Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World. UNDP, pp. 17–25. Мoscow: Ves Mir Publ. (In Russian.)
- Sotnichenko А. (2008). The great reformers // Mohammad Reza Pahlavi // Cossack on the Persian throne. «Delo» (An Analytical Weekly), April 28. Available at: http://www.idelo.ru/508/23.html. (In Russian.)
- Syukiyaynen L. (2009). Religion, Law and Islamic thought in modern Turkey. Scientists on Fethullah Gülen, January 12. Available at: http://fgulen.ru/ru/about-fethullah-gulen/scientists/30352-religionlaw-and-islamic-thought-in-modern-turkey. (In Russian.)
- The program of the Party of Justice and Development (undated). Foreign Policy. Available at: http://www.akparti.org.tr/site. (In Turkish.)
- Vasilyev А. (1983). Persian Gulf in the eye of the storm. Мoscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian.)
- Vasilyev А. (1994). History of the East, in two volumes, vol. 2. Мoscow: Vyshaya shkola Publ. (In Russian.)
- Bendix R. (1966). Max Weber: An intellectual portrait. London: Methuen.
- Frey F.W. (1965). The Turkish political elite. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 483 p.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606