SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2012
  • No 1.1
  • Modern approaches to innovative competition investigation and technological management in Russia

Modern approaches to innovative competition investigation and technological management in Russia

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 10 (no. 1.1),
p. 53-69

Innovation activity of firms is one of the most important aspects of contemporary economic analysis. Three areas of such research are dealt with in the article, namely: from theory of firm point of view; from market structure analysis, and from economy performance viewpoint. Positive characteristics and limitations of static and dynamic approaches towards innovation competition are demonstrated. The relationship between economics of innovation and practice of technological management is provided. A detailed investigation of Russian technological management is presented as an example.


Keywords: innovation; technological management; innovation competition

References:
  • Исследование экспертов Российской экономической школы, PriceWaterhouse Coopers в России, Центром технологий и инноваций PwC, «Инновационная активность крупного бизнеса в России. Механизмы, барьеры, перспективы», М., 2010.
  • Мескон М., Альберт М., Хедоури Фр. Основы менеджмента. М.: Дело. 1997. С. 94.
  • Найден М. «Казуистика против создателей». 27.01.2009. Официальный сайт РАН, URL: http://www.ras.ru/cUgest/showdnews.aspx?id=lde27401-39a0-4261-95cl-6cb4eb937f73.
  • Официальный сайт Министерства экономического развития РФ. URL:http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/CorpManagment/doc20110316_04.
  • Постановление от 9.04.2010 г. № 219 «О государственной поддержке развития инновационной инфраструктуры в федеральных образовательных учреждениях высшего профессионального образования».
  • Постановление от 9.04.2010 г. № 218 «О мерах государственной поддержки развития кооперации российских высших учебных заведений и организаций, реализующих комплексные проекты по созданию высокотехнологичного производства».
  • Райзберг Б.А., Лозовский ЛЖ Словарь современных экономических терминов. 4-е изд. М.: Айрис-Пресс. 2008.
  • Реестр инновационных компаний, подтвердивших инновационность по методике КЭРППиТ. Информационный портал «Инновационный Санкт-Петербург», URL: http://www.spbinno.ru/innovacionnaya_politika/investoram/reestr_innovacionnyh_predpriyatij/.
  • РСПП предлагает определить критерии инновационности. 2010. Информационное агентство Финмаркет, Группа Интерфакс. URL: http://www.finmarket.ru/z/nws/news.asp?id=1495585.
  • Стратегия инновационного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года. URL: http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/innovations/doc20101231_016?presentationtemplate=docHTMLTemplatel&presentationtemplateid=2dd7bc8044687de796f0f7af753c8a7e.
  • Сурин А. В., Молчанова О.П. Инновационный менеджмент. М.: Инфра-М, 2009.
  • Фивейский С. Критерии инновационности компании. 2009. ИА BisHelp (Помощь Бизнесу).Ш&: http://www.bishelp.ru/svoe_delo/detail.php?ID=78890.
  • Acemoglu D., Dan Vu Cao. Innovation by entrants and incumbents. NBER Working Paper. N16411. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/wl6411.
  • Adner R., Levinthal D. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implications for product and process innovation. Management Science. 2001. V.47. N.5. P. 611-628.
  • Aghion Ph., Burgess R., Redding 5. and Zilibotti F. Entry liberalization and inequality in industrial performance. Journal of the European Economic Association Papers and Proceed. 2005. V.3. P. 291-302. Aghion Ph., Harris Ch., Howitt P. and Vichers J. Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Reviews of Economic Studies. 2001. V.68. P. 467-492.
  • Aghion Ph., Howwitt P. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica. 1992. Vol. 60. P. 323-351.
  • Argyres N.. Silverman B. R&D, Organization Structure, and the Development of Corporate Technological Knowledge. Strategic Management Journal. 2004. Vol. 25. No. 8/9, P. 929-958.
  • Astebro Т., Serrano C. Business partners, financing, and the commercialization of inventions. NBER Working Paper. N.17181. 2011. June.
  • Atkeson A., Burstein A. Innovation, firm dynamics and international trade. N.Y. 2010. Barbos A. Essays on the Context Effects Bias and on the Relationship Between Competition and Innovation. A dissertation submitted to the graduate school in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of philosophy, field of economics. 2009. Northwestern university, Evanston, Illinois. Bell G. Clusters, Networks and Firm Innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal. 2005. Vol. 2005. P. 287-295.
  • Bester H., Petrakis E. The Incentives for Cost Reduction in a Differentiated Industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1993.Vol. 11. P. 519-534.
  • Brander J., Spencer B. Strategic Commitment with R&D: the Symmetric Case. Bell Journal of Economics. 1983. Vol. 14. P. 225-235.
  • Breschi S., Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation, The Economic Journal Apr., 2000. No. 463. Vol. 110. P. 388-410.
  • Davis L.E. Job Satisfaction Research» The Post Industrial View. Industrial Relations. 1971. Vol. 10. P. 176-193.
  • Dawid H., Kopel M., Kort P.M. Innovation Threats and Strategic Responces in Oligopoly Markets. Journal of International Economics. 2010. Vol. 80. P. 260-270.
  • Delbono F., Denicolo V. R&D in Symmetric and Homogenous Oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1990.Vol. 8. P. 297-313.
  • Dussauge P., Garrette В.. Mitchell W. Learning from Competing Partners: Outcomes and Durations of Scale and Link Alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal. 2000. Vol. 21 (2), P. 99-126.
  • Etro F., «Innovation by Leaders», The Economic Journal. 2004. Vol. 114. No. 495. P. 281-303.
  • Farrell J., Katz M. Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in systems markets. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 2000. Vol. 48. N. 4. P. 413-432.
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardizatioa compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics. 1985. Vol.16. P. 70-83
  • Gerbach H., SchmutzlerA. Endogenous Spillovers and Incentives to Innovate. Economic Theory. 2003. Vol. 21. No.l. P. 59-79.
  • Giannakas K., Fulton M. Process Innovation Activity in a Mixed Oligopoly: The Role of Cooperatives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2005. Vol. 87. No. 2. P. 406-422.
  • Gjerde P. K., Slotnick S.. Sobel M. New product innovation with multiple features and technology constraints. Management Science. 2002. Vol. 48. N.10. P.1268-1284.
  • Gnyawali D.R., Park B.-J. R. Co-opetition Between Giants: Collaboration with Competitors for Technological Innovation. Research Policy. 2011. Vol. 40.1. 5. P. 650-663.
  • Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica. 1957. Vol. 25. N. 4. P. 501-522.
  • Grossman G., Helpman E. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies. 1991. Vol.68. P. 43-61.
  • Heerde H., Mela C., Manchanda P. The Dynamic effect of Innovation on Market Structure. Journal of Market Research. 2004. Vol. 41. No. 2. P. 166-183.
  • Hill C.W.L., Rothaermel F. T. The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation. The Academy of Management Review. 2003. Vol. 28. P. 257-274.
  • Hippel E., Katz R. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science. 2002. Vol. 48. N. 7. P.821-833.
  • Hugo A. Hopenhayn, Matthew F. Mitchell «Innovation Variety and Patent Breadth», The RAND Journal of Economics. 2001. Vol. 32. No.l. P. 152-166.
  • Jensen R. Innovative Leadership: First-Mover Advantages in New Product Adoption. Economic Theory. 2003. Vol. 21. No.l. P. 97-116.
  • Jensen R. Strategic intrafirm innovation adoption and diffusion. Southern Economic Journal. 2001. Vol. 68. N. 1. P. 120-132.
  • Jones Ch. R and d-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy. 1995. Vol.103. P.759-784.
  • Joshua S. Gans, David H. Hsu. Scott Stem. When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? The RAND Journal of Economics. 2002. Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 571-586. JovanovicB. Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica. 1982. Vol.50. P. 649-670. Katz M., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75. N. 3. P. 424-440.
  • Kletter Т.. Kortum S. Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. Journal of Political Economy. 2004. Vol.112. N. 5. P. 986-1018.
  • Lacetera N.. Zirulia L. Individual preferences, organization, and competition in a model of R&D incentive provision. NBER Working Paper. N.17031. 2011. May.
  • Liao S. Technology management methodologies and applications: A literature review from 1995 to 2003. Tech-novation. 2005. Vol. 25. P. 381-393.
  • Luttmer E. Selection. «Growth and the size distribution of firms». Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2007. Vol. 122. P. 1103-1144.
  • McGrath R.G., NerkarA. Real Options Reasoning and a New Look at the R&D Investment Strategies of Pharmaceutical Firms. Strategic Management Journal. 2004. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 1-21.
  • Melitz M. «The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity». Econometrica. 2003. Vol. 71 N. 6. P. 1695-1725.
  • Milliou C., Petrakis E. Timing of Technology, Adoption and Product Market Competition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2011. Vol. 78. P. 229-245.
  • Nicholas Т., «Why Schumpeter Was Right: Innovation, Market Power, and Creative Dectruction in 1920s America», The Journal of Economic History. 2003. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 1023-1058.
  • Ofek E., Sarvary M. «R&D, Marketing, and the Success of Next-Generation Products», Marketing Science. 2003. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 355-370.
  • Perrow Ch. Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1970.
  • Qiu L.D. On the Dynamic Efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory. 1997. Vol. 75. P. 213-229.
  • Rajesh K., Chandy, Gerard J. Tellis, The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation, The Journal of Marketing, 2000, Vol. 64, No. 3. P. 1-17
  • Romer P. Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol.98. N.5. P.71-102. Rothaermal F. Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfrm Cooperation. Strategic Management Journal. 2001. Vol. 22 (6-7). P. 687-699.
  • Ryan S., Tucker C. Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. NBER Working Paper. N.17253. 2011. July.
  • Segerstrom A., Paul S. and Elias Dinopoloulos. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review. 1990. V.80. P.1077-1091.
  • Sheremata W.A. Competing Through Innovation in Network Markets: Strategies for Challengers. The Academy of Management Review. 2004. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 359-377.
  • Shobha S., Das, Andrew H. Van de Ven, «Competing with New Product Technologies: A Process Model of Strategy", Management Science. Oct. 2000. Vol. 46. No. 10. P. 1300-1316.
  • Shogo Hamasaki. Dynamic Competition, Strategic Knowledge Sharing, Innovation Policy. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Economics. 2011. University of California. Los Angeles.
  • Spencer J.W. Firms» Knowledge-Sharing Strategies in the Global Innovation System: Empirical Evidence from the Flat Panel Display Industry. Strategic Management Journal. 2003. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 217-233.
  • Stuart Т.Е. «Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a Hign-Technology Industry». Strategic Management Journal. 2000. Vol. 21. No. 8. P. 791-811.
  • Tishler A., Milstein I. R&D Wars and the Effects of Innovation on the Success and Survivability of Firms in Oligopoly Markets. European Economic Review. 2008. Vol. 52. P. 589-610.
  • Tsai K.-H. Collaborative Networks and Product Innovation Performance: Toward a Contingency Perspective. Research Policy. 2008. Vol. 37. P. 1317-1328.
  • Weeds H. Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition. The Review of Economic Studies. 2002. Vol. 69. N. 3. P. 729-747.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606