ЮФУ
ул. М. Горького, 88, к. 211
г.Ростов-на-Дону, Россия
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.
Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.

TERRA ECONOMICUS

ИННОВАЦИОННАЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ И ВОЗДЕЙСТВИЕ ИНВЕСТИЦИЙ В НИОКР НА ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ РОСТ: ОЦЕНКА И МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Том 16 (номер 4),

В этой статье представлены новые подходы к роли инновационной деятельности в контексте решения современных задач экономического роста, а также потребности и возможности для улучшения оценки и моделирования влияния инвестиций в научно-исследовательские и опытно-конструкторские работы (НИОКР) на экономический рост. Основное внимание уделяется процессам инновационной деятельности и росту экономики в Европейском Союзе, а также целям, которые сформулированы в Стратегии «Европа 2020» и в других документах Европейского Союза. Раскрываются особенности применения различных индикаторов и индексов, в частности, принимая во внимание потребности в разработке и обосновании решений экономической политики. Представлены новые аспекты применения различных инновационных индексов, таких как Глобальный индекс инноваций, Табло EC инноваций, Индекс конкурентнoспособной промышленной деятельности, Индекс глобальной конкурентоспособности, Индекс экономики знаний и Индекс инновационной мощности. Предлагается и описывается новый метод оценки и моделирования воздействия инвестиций в НИОКР на экономический рост.


Ключевые слова: Европа 2020; Европейский Cоюз; экономический рост; инвестиции в НИОКР; инновационная деятельность

Список литературы:
  • Appiah, K. M., Possumah, B. T., Ahmat, N., and Sanusi, N. A. (2018). External Environment and SMEs Investment in The Ghanaian Oil and Gas Sector // Economics and Sociology, 11(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-1/8
  • Benešová, D., Kubičková, V., Michálková, A., and Krošláková, M. (2018). Innovation activities of gazelles in business services as a factor of sustainable growth in the Slovak Republic // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 452–466. https://doi. org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(3)
  • Čábelková, I., and Strielkowski, W. (2013). Is the level of taxation a product of culture? A cultural economics approach // Society and Economy, 35(4), 513–529. https://doi. org/10.1556/SocEc.2013.0007
  • Carayannis, E. G., and Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Using multiobjective mathematical programming to link national competitiveness, productivity, and innovation // Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 635–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1873-x
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press (https://hbr.org/product/ open-innovation-the-new-imperative-for-creating-and-profiting-from-technology/8377- HBK-ENG).
  • Cunningham, J. A., and Link, A. N. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of research and innovation policies among European Union countries // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0394-7
  • De Propris, L. (2013). How are the Creative Industries Weathering the Crisis? // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/ rss025
  • Ehrenberger, M., Koudelkova, P., and Strielkowski, W. (2015). Factors influencing innovation in small and medium enterprises in the Czech Republic // Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7737
  • Europe 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Communication from the Commission, European Commission, COM(2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 3.3.2010 (http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20 -%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf).
  • European Commission (2011). Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union (https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/feb8c03e-523f4437-9aa0-d27e71fe582c/language-en).
  • European Commission (2017). European Union Scoreboard 2017 file:///C:/Users/Rolandas/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/ Downloads/170727_EIS2017%20(1).pdf
  • Eurostat (2018). Eurostat database (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database).
  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter (https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/12880642).
  • Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., and Sokolov, A. (2016). Foresight: Turning challenges into opportunities, pp. 1–8 / In: L. Gokhberg, D. Meissner, and A. Sokolov (eds.) Deploying foresight for policy and strategy makers. Creating opportunities through public policies and corporate strategies in science, technology and innovation. Heidelberg: Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25628-3_1
  • Hollanders, H., and van Cruysen, A. (2008). Rethinking the European Innovation Scoreboard: A new methodology for 2008–2010 // INNO Metrics Thematic Paper, European Commission, Brussels (http://es.eustat.eus/elementos/ele0006100/ti_methodology-reporteis-2008-2010/inf0006199_c.pdf).
  • Janda, K., Rausser, G., and Strielkowski, W. (2013). Determinants of profitability of Polish rural micro-enterprises at the time of EU Accession // Eastern European Countryside, 19, 177–217. https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2013-0009
  • Jang, Y., Ko, Y., and So Young Kim, S., Y. (2016). Cultural correlates of national innovative capacity: a cross-national analysis of national culture and innovation rates // Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 33–43. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40852-016-0048-6
  • Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jędrych, A., and Mroczek-Dąbrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Pola d and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index // Comparative Economic Research, 20(3), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0021
  • Kalyugina, S., Strielkowski, W., Ushvitsky, L., and Astachova, E. (2015). Sustainable and secure development: facet of personal financial issues // Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 5(2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.2(14)
  • Kashintseva, V., Strielkowski, W., Streimikis, J., and Veynbender, T. (2018). Consumer Attitudes towards Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage Products and Technologies // Energies, 11(10), 2787. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102787
  • Kiseľáková, D., Šofranková, B., Čabinová, V., and Onuferová, E. (2018). Competitiveness and sustainable growth analysis of the EU countries with the use of Global Indexes’ methodology // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 581–599. https://doi. org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(13)
  • Koudelková, P., Strielkowski, W., and Hejlová, D. (2015). Corruption and system change in the Czech Republic: Firm-level evidence // DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 6(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0002
  • Lisin, E., & Strielkowski, W. (2014). Modelling new economic approaches for the wholesale energy markets in Russia and the EU. Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(2B), 566–580.
  • Lisin, E., Rogalev, A., Strielkowski, W., and Komarov, I. (2015). Sustainable modernization of the Russian power utilities industry. Sustainability, 7(9), 11378–11400. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3390/su70911378
  • Lisin, E., Sobolev, A., Strielkowski, W., and Garanin, I. (2016). Thermal efficiency of cogeneration units with multi-stage reheating for Russian municipal heating systems // Energies, 9(4), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9040269
  • Lisin, E., Strielkowski, W., Chernova, V., and Fomina, A. (2018). Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration // Energies, 11(12), 3284. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123284
  • Lundvall, B.-A. (1998). Why study national systems of innovations and national styles of innovation // Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(4), 407–421. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524324
  • Meissner, D., Polt, W., and Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Towards a broad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy // The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1184–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9485-4
  • Mir-Babayev, R., Gulaliyev, M., Shikhaliyeva, S., Azizova, R., and Ok, N. (2017). The Impact of Cultural Diversity on Innovation Performance: Evidence from Construction Industry of Azerbaijan // Economics and Sociology, 10(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2017/10-1/6
  • Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Newbery, D., Pollitt, M., Ritz, R., and Strielkowski, W. (2018). Market design for a highrenewables European electricity system // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.025
  • OECD (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Oslo Manual (http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2367580.pdf).
  • OECD (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264239012-en
  • Oganisjana, K., Svirina, A., Surikova, S., Grīnberga-Zālīte, G., and Kozlovskis, K. (2017). Engaging universities in social innovation research for understanding sustainability issues // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.9770/ jesi.2017.5.1(1)
  • Radwan, A. (2018). Science and innovation policies in North African Countries: Exploring challenges and opportunities // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(17)
  • Schumpeter, J. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.187354/page/n1
  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin (https://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/Schumpeter,%20Capitalism,%20Socialism%20and%20Democracy.pdf).
  • Strazdas, R., Černevičiūtė, J., and Jančoras, Ž. (2014). Dynamics of the understanding of innovation in the context of the development of traditional and creative industries // Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(2A), 42–59.
  • Štreimikienė, D., Strielkowski, W., Bilan, Y., and Mikalauskas, I. (2016). Energy dependency and sustainable regional development in the Baltic states: A review // Geographica Pannonica, 20(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1602079S
  • Strielkowski, W., and Čábelková, I. (2015). Religion, culture, and tax evasion: Evidence from the Czech Republic // Religions, 6(2), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020657
  • Svagzdiene, B., and Kuklyte, J. (2016). The analysis of factors which have impact for summary innovation index in Germany, Estonia and Lithuania // Transformation in Business & Economics, 15(2B), 784–799.
  • The World Bank (2018). The World Bank database (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator).
  • Vilys, M., Jakubavičius, A., and Žemaitis, E. (2015). Public Innovation Support Index for Impact Assessment in the European Economic Area // Entrepreneurial Business & Economics Review, 3(4), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2015.030408
  • Żelazny, R. (2017). Determinants and measurement of smart growth: evidence from Poland // Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 34–45. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/2
Издатель: Южный Федеральный Университет
Учредитель: Южный федеральный университет
ISSN: 2073-6606