Multipolar management in Russian universities
Maxim A. Rybachuk
State University of Management, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
State University of Management, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia
Alexander A. Kobylko
State University of Management, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
State University of Management, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia
TERRA ECONOMICUS,
Vol. 24,
No 3
Citation: Rybachuk M.A., Kobylko A.A. (2026). Multipolar management in Russian universities. Terra Economicus 24(3), 88–104. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2026-24-3-88-104
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project № 24-18-00948). https://rscf. ru/project/24-18-00948/
In the context of a profound transformation of the Russian higher education system, driven by both internal challenges and external factors – digitalization, sanctions pressure, shifting government policy, and a rethinking of the role of the university in society as a whole – the need to find new approaches to university management is growing. Traditional corporate management models, focused primarily on operational efficiency and external rankings, are proving insufficient to ensure the long-term sustainable development of universities. This article proposes a framework for diagnosing and optimizing university management structures based on the concept of multipolar management. According to this approach, organizational management is built on the interaction of four social poles – inspirational, spiritual, cultural, and intellectual – each led by a corresponding social leader and aligned with a specific university subsystem (object, environment, process, or project). Based on a content analysis of the strategic documents of twenty leading Russian universities (the top 10 according to RAEX and 10 federal universities), dominant poles were identified, a typology of universities was defined, and imbalances in their governance structures were analyzed. Specifically, stable patterns reflecting the differentiation of higher education by mission, profile, and territorial role were identified: inspirational-humanitarian, cultural-technical, intellectual-research, and values-regional. Based on the data obtained, recommendations were proposed for developing a balanced multipolar university governance structure, taking into account the institution’s profile and mission. The article also outlines prospects for creating a cartographic model of the Russian higher education system – a model that could serve as a basis for determining the optimal number of universities both in a specific region and at the national level.
Keywords:
multipolar governance; management poles; content analysis; higher education; university; strategy; development program
JEL codes:
C63, G21, G22, E58, O33
References:
- Ambarova, P., Zborovsky, G. (2017). University management in the assessments of educational communities. University Management: Practice and Analysis 21(3), 100–111 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2017.03.042
- Balatsky, E., Ekimova, N. (2018). Experience in identifying world‑class universities. World Economy and International Relations 62(1), 104–113 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-1-104-113
- Balatsky, E., Ekimova, N. (2022a). Identification of world‑class universities: Destructive pluralism. The World of New Economy 16(3), 6–19 (in Russian). DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-3-6-19
- Balatsky, E., Ekimova, N. (2022b). Reformatting the Russian university in the context of hybrid warfare. Journal of Economic Regulation 13(4), 24–38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17835/2078-5429.2022.13.4.024-038
- Berezin, A., Minaeva, O., Medveditskova, A., Yurova, O. (2023). Development of the university project activity ecosystem in the interests of key regional stakeholders. Issues of Innovative Economy 13(1), 453–470 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.13.1.117040
- Brylina, I. (2018). The role of regional universities in cluster‑network partnerships. Professional Education in the Modern World 8(4), 2212–2223 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15372/PEMW20180409
- Volchik, V., Zhuk, A., Fursa, E. (2021). Mechanisms for overcoming institutional traps in education and science. Journal of Institutional Studies 13(1), 135–155 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.1.135-155
- Vorobyova, E., Krakovetskaya, I. (2017). Promoting Russian universities in global competitiveness rankings: Is the goal near? Creative Economy 11(5), 521–552 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18334/ce.11.5.37857
- Grishin, V., Shtykhno, D., Shubenkova, E. (2019). Enhancing the competitiveness of Russian universities on the global stage: Challenges and solutions. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (4), 85–95 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2019-4-85-95
- Guba, K. (2022). Scientometric indicators in the assessment of Russian universities: A review of studies. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology 31(1), 49–73 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038Х-2022-31-1-49-73
- Gurfova, R., Ashinova, I. (2020). University‑region interaction in the digital economy. Proceedings of Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies 82(4), 307–312 (in Russian).
- Daviy, A., Molodchik, M., Matveeva‑Ram, E., Sanina, K. (2024). The impact of individual leader characteristics on enterprise digitalization. Russian Management Journal 22(4), 698–718 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu18.2024.404
- Egorov, A. (2020). Assessing university performance based on production functions. University Management: Practice and Analysis 24(4), 87–99 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2020.04.037
- Izotova, A., Gavrilyuk, E. (2022). Ecosystem approach as a new trend in higher education development. Issues of Innovative Economy 12(2), 1211–1226 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.2.114869
- Sabden, O., Naumov, E. (eds.) (2009). Intellectual Economy – Technological Challenges of the 21st Century. Almaty: Eksklyuziv Publ. (in Russian).
- Kleiner, G. (2019). Ecosystem economics: A step into the future. Economic Revival of Russia (1), 40–45 (in Russian).
- Kleiner, G. (2020). Intellectual economy of the new century: Post‑knowledge economy. Economic Revival of Russia (1), 35–42 (in Russian).
- Kleiner, G. (2022). Social leadership, power splitting, and inclusive organizational governance. Voprosy Ekonomiki (4), 26–44 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-26-44
- Kleiner, G. (2024). Multipolar organizational governance. Russian Management Journal 22(2), 163–178 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu18.2024.201
- Kleiner, G., Rybachuk, M. (2017). Systemic balance of the economy. Moscow: Publishing House “Scientific Library” (in Russian).
- Kobylko, A., Rybachuk, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of meso‑level strategies: Region, industry, corporation. Russian Journal of Economics and Law 18(4), 898–911 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2024.4.898-911
- Kulyasova, E., Trifonov, P. (2020). Developing forms of interaction between universities and the business community in the digital economy. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management 11(2), 216–223. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2020-2-216-223
- Kurakova, N., Tsvetkova, L. (2021). Technological entrepreneurship in regional Russian universities: Constraining and accelerating factors. Economics of Science 7(3), 170–187 (in Russian).
- Kurbatova, M. (2023). Results‑based management in Russian education: Issues of regulatory regulation. ECO (3), 8–26 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2023-3-8-26
- Lapidus, L. (2024). Ontogenesis of the digital economy and data economy: The concept of “intelligent hyperconnectivity in Industry X.0”. Russian Management Journal 22(3), 370–400 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu18.2024.302
- Maslova, L., Gafforova, E. (2012). Strategic university management: Stakeholder requirements analysis. University Management: Practice and Analysis (5), 53–60 (in Russian).
- Moskovkin, V., Zhang, H., Sadovski, M. (2019). Which Russian universities have a chance to enter the top 100 of the three leading global rankings in 2020? Economics of Science 5(2), 143–156 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-2-143-156
- Novgorodov, P. (2018). University performance efficiency: From monitoring and rankings to intellectual capital assessment. Upravlenets – The Manager 9(1), 48–55 (in Russian). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-1-7
- Romanov, E. (2019). Assessing university performance: Contradictions and paradoxes. Part I. Education and Science 21(9), 9–48 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-9-9-48
- Romanov, E. (2021). Assessing the performance of Russian universities: Is it necessary to change the paradigm? Education and Science 23(6), 84–125 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-83-125
- Sadovaya, E., Yurevich, M. (2025). Education in the context of the modern struggle for leadership. Terra Economicus 23(3), 68–80 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2025-23-3-68-80
- Titova, N. (ed.) (2008). Strategies for the development of Russian universities: Responding to new challenges. Moscow, MAKS Press. (in Russian).
- Tomilin, O. (2023). A critical review of the evolution of university management practices. University Management: Practice and Analysis 27(3), 115–130 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2023.03.027
- Bychkova, O. (ed.) (2016). Participation in University Governance: A Scientific Publication. St. Petersburg: Norma Publ. (in Russian).
- Flek, M., Ugnich, E. (2020). University‑enterprise interaction: The experience of a basic department in training engineering personnel. University Management: Practice and Analysis 24(3), 122–136 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2020.03.030
- Flek, M., Ugnich, E. (2025). Developing sustainable engineering careers in the ecosystem of enterprise human capital reproduction. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research) 16(4), 762–779 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18184/2079-4665.2025.16.4.762-779
- Shcherbina, V., Popova, E. (2019). The university as a specific type of organization: Functions and relationships with the external environment. Research Result. Sociology and Management 5(4), 184–199 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-4-0-16
- Ebzeeva, Yu., Smirnova, Yu. (2022). Positions of Russian universities in global rankings in 2022. RUDN Journal of Sociology 22(4), 909–918 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-4-909-918
- Yurova, O., Medveditskova, A., Berezin, A., Minaeva, O. (2023). Project activity centers as an element of the entrepreneurship ecosystem in universities. Leadership and Management 10(2), 579–596 (in Russian).
- Azeiteiro, U., Davim, J.P. (Eds.). (2019). Higher Education and Sustainability: Opportunities and Challenges for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b22452
- Bornmann, L., Gralka, S., de Moya Anegón, F., Wohlrabe, K. (2023). Efficiency of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide: The introduction of a new input indicator reflecting institutional staff numbers. Journal of Informetrics 17(2), 101400. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2023.101400
- Ferdousmou, J., Samiun, M., Mohammad, N. et al. (2025). IT management strategies for scaling artificial intelligence-powered educational systems in American schools and universities. Journal of Posthumanism 5(2), 470–486. DOI: 10.63332/joph.v5i2.433
- Galarowicz, A. (2025). Cooperation between universities and the business community as a form of achieving sustainable development. E-mentor 108(1), 14–24. DOI: 10.15219/em108.1692
- Gegenhuber, T., Dobusch, L. (2016). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning 50(3), 337–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2016.09.001
- Kalebar, R., Swetha, N, Mahadev, A., Naveen, C.L., Diganta, K. D. (2024). Strategic management in higher education: Navigating challenges and opportunities. Journal of Informatics Education and Research 1(2), 97. DOI: 10.52783/jier.v4i2.717
- Kleiner, G., Kobylko, A. (2022). Business ecosystem strategy: Design and specifics. In: Vasiliev Y.S., Pankratova N.D., Volkova V.N., Shipunova O.D., Lyabakh N.N. (eds.) System Analysis in Engineering and Control. SAEC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 442 (pp. 43–51). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98832-6_4
- Mynbayeva, A., Minazheva, G., Sadyrova, M., Zholdassova, M. (2024). Examining leadership styles in higher education management: evidence from Kazakhstan. International Journal of Leadership in Education (1), 22. DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2024.2304564
- Orduna-Malea, E., Aytac, S., Tran, C. (2019). Universities through the eyes of bibliographic databases: A retroactive growth comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics 121, 433–450. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03208-7
- Panait, M., Ionescu, R., Hysa, E., Blessinger, P. (2025). Powering the future: Green energy and sustainable development in universities. In: Machado, C., Davim, J. (eds.) Management in Higher Education for Sustainability. Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-84963-3_6
- Popkova, E. (2025). Advanced experience of sustainable development of EdTech based on Universities 4.0 in Russia and Central Asia for strategic academic leadership. In: Sergi, B., Popkova, E., Adieva, A., Atabekova, N. (eds.) University 4.0 and Educational Technology for Sustainable Development. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 75. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-7376-6_1
- Reeves, M., Candelon, F. (2022). New Leadership Imperatives. De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110775174
- Splitter, V., Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. (2021). Middle managers’ struggle over their subject position in open strategy processes. Journal of Management Studies 60(7), 1884–1923. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12776
- Tennant, J.P. (2020). Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. European Science Editing, e51987. DOI: 10.3897/ese.2020.e51987
- Weinberger, D. (2019). Everyday Chaos: Technology, Complexity, and How We’re Thriving in a New World of Possibility. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Whittington, R., Yakis-Douglas, B. (2020). The grand challenge of corporate control: Opening strategy to the normative pressures of networked professionals. Organization Theory 1(4), 1–19. DOI: 10.1177/2631787720969697
Publisher:
Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606
ISSN: 2073-6606
- Hits: 102