SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2022
  • No 1
  • Inequality perceptions and redistribution preferences: An international comparison

Inequality perceptions and redistribution preferences: An international comparison


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 20 (no. 1),

Our study aims at assessing the perceptions of inequality in Russia and European countries. We rely on empirical evidence provided by the European Social Survey (ESS8 2016). Research results show that the value of equality and the demand for the tools of redistribution are non-linearly dependent on the age of respondents. Our findings are in line with the hypothesis of multiple equilibria between individual perceptions of inequality and the demand for redistribution tools, as well as the hypothesis of “altruism of the rich”, with regard to older respondents in the Russian Federation. Russian equalization policy shows low efficiency, while both the level of inequality and demand for redistribution tools remain relatively high. The hypothesis about the impact of employment on estimates of inequality and redistribution policies has not been confirmed. We found no gender differences in estimates of inequality, the demand for redistribution, and the effectiveness of the equalization policy in Russia and European countries. There is a high level of solidarity among respondents in European countries regarding the values of equal chances and outcomes. However, there are significant differences in the demand for redistribution instruments, which can be explained by cultural and historical effects, the level of trust in government institutions, as well as by the model of country’s social policy. Our findings can contribute to public opinion monitoring and policy support for strengthened solidarity.
Citation: Frolova E.A., Malanina V.A., Klemasheva E.I., Kashapova E.R. (2022). Inequality perceptions and redistribution preferences: An international comparison. Terra Economicus 20(1): 81–101. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-1-81-101
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project № 19-18-00282 “Developing a comprehensive system for assessing the inequality of the older adults and designing tools to strengthen their resilience”


Keywords: older adults; inequality; Gini coefficient; redistributive policies; equalization; income; efficiency

JEL codes: D31, O57, Z13

References:
  • Аникин В.А., Лежнина Ю.П., Мареева С.В., Слободенюк Е.Д. (2020). Кто и почему ищет государственной поддержки в новой России? Мир России 29(1): 31–52. [Anikin V., Lezhnina Yu., Mareeva S., Slobodenyuk E. (2020). The factors behind the demand of Russians for the state support. Mir Rossii 29(1): 31–52 (in Russian).]
  • Вишневский Ю.Р. (2016). Студенчество России о социальном неравенстве и социальной справедливости: Сборник научных статей. М.: Российское общество социологов; Екатеринбург: Изд-во УМЦ УПИ, 253 с. [Vishnevsky Yu. (2016). Students of Russia on social inequality and social justice: a collection of scientific articles. Moscow: Russian Society of Sociologists; Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Educational and Methodological Center of the Ural Polytechnic Institute, 253 p. (in Russian).]
  • Гимпельсон В.Е., Монусова Г.А. (2014). Восприятие неравенства и социальная мобильность. Препринт WP3/2014/03. НИУ ВШЭ, 39 с. [Gimpelson V., Monusova G. (2014). Perception of inequality and social mobility. Working Paper WP3/2014/03. HSE University, 39 p. (in Russian).]
  • Капелюшников Р. (2020). Команда Т. Пикети о неравенстве в России: коллекция статистических артефактов. Вопросы экономики (4): 67–106. [Kapelyushnikov R. (2020). T. Piketty?s team on inequality in Russia: a collection of statistical artifacts. Voprosy Ekonomiki (4): 67–106 (in Russian).]
  • Кислицына О.А. (2018). Восприятие россиянами несправедливости неравенства в доступе к услугам здравоохранения и детерминирующие его факторы. Социальные аспекты здоровья населения (3): 1–10. [Kislitsyna O. (2018). Perception of injustice of inequality in access to health care by citizens of the Russian Federation and its determinants. Social Aspects of Population Health (3): 1–10 (in Russian).]
  • Мареева С. (2021). Представления среднего класса о неравенствах на фоне других россиян: консенсус или раскол. Социологические исследования (1): 38–49. [Mareeva S. (2021). Middle-class perceptions of inequality compared to other Russians: Consensus or disagreement? Sotsiologitcheskie issledovaniya (1): 38–49 (in Russian).]
  • Мареева С.В. (2019). Восприятие социальных неравенств населением: вызовы и возможности для социальной политики, с. 389–393 / В сб.: Горшков М.К. (ред.). Будущее социологического знания и вызовы социальных трансформаций (к 90-летию со дня рождения В.А. Ядова). Сборник материалов международной научной конференции. М.: ФНИСЦ РАН. [Mareeva S. (2019). Perception of social inequalities by the population: Challenges and opportunities for social policy, pp. 389–393. In: Gorshkov М. (ed.) The Future of Sociological Knowledge and Challenges of Social Transformations (To the 90th Anniversary of the Birth of V.A. Yadov) (in Russian).]
  • Мареева С., Тихонова Н. (2016). Бедность и социальные неравенства в России в общественном сознании. Мир России 25(2): 37–67. [Mareeva S., Tihonova N. (2016). Public perceptions of poverty and social inequality in Russia. Mir Rossii 25(2): 37–67 (in Russian).]
  • Alesina A., Angeletos G. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review 95(4): 960–980.
  • Alesina A., Di Tella R., MacCulloch R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics 88(9-10): 2009–2042.
  • Andersen R., Curtis J. (2015). Social class, economic inequality, and the convergence of policy preferences: Evidence from 24 modern democracies. Canadian Review of Sociology 52(3): 266–288.
  • Benabou R., Ok E. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 447–487.
  • Choi G. (2019). Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. European Journal of Political Economy 58: 220–244.
  • Cruces G., Perez-Truglia R., Tetaz M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics 98: 100–112.
  • Cutler J., Nitschke J., Lamm C. et al. (2021). Older adults across the globe exhibit increased prosocial behavior but also greater in-group preferences. Nat Aging 1: 880–888. DOI: 10.1038/s43587-021-00118-3
  • Danilova E. (2017). Actual and perceptual social inequality under transformative change in Russia and China. Europe-Asia Studies 69(1): 27–52.
  • Duman A. (2020). Subjective social class and individual preferences for redistribution: Cross-country empirical analysis. International Journal of Social Economics 47(2): 173–189.
  • Durante R., Putterman L., Van der Weele J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association 12(4): 1059–1086.
  • Falk A., Becker A., Dohmen T., Enke B., Huffman D., Sunde U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(4): 1645–1692.
  • Garcia-Sanchez E., Osborne D., Willis G.B., Rodriguez-Bailon R. (2020). Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology 59(1): 111–136.
  • Gimpelson V., Treisman D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics 30(1): 27–54.
  • Guillaud E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries. Journal of economic inequality 11(1): 57–78.
  • Isaksson A.S., Lindskog A. (2009). Preferences for redistribution. A country comparison of fairness judgements. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72(3): 884–902.
  • Jaspal R., Breakwell G. (2022). Socio-economic inequalities in social network, loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry 68(1): 155–165.
  • Marten L. (2019). Demand for redistribution: individuals? responses to economic setbacks. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 121(1): 225–242.
  • McGrath L. (2015). Inequality in economic perceptions within and between EU member countries. In: Dawson M., Enderlein H., Joerges C. (eds.) Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe?s Economic, Political and Legal Transformation. Oxford. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198752868.003.0015
  • Meltzer A., Richard S. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914–927.
  • Piketty T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3): 551–584.
  • Ravallion M., Lokshin M. (2000). Who wants to redistribute? The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia. Journal of Public Economics 76(1): 87–104.
  • Roth C., Wohlfart J. (2018). Experienced inequality and preferences for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 167: 251–262.
  • Schneider S. (2016). Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Trends, challenges, and research directions. Journal of Happiness Studies 17(4): 1719–1739.
  • Sunde U., Dohmen T., Enke B., Falk A., Huffman D. (2020). Patience and comparative development. ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 035. University of Bonn and University of Cologne. Germany. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/035.html (accessed December 25 2021).
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606