SFeDu
  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2021
  • No 1
  • Corporate human capital management in the context of generational theory

Corporate human capital management in the context of generational theory


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 19 (no. 1),

This paper treats human capital as referring to interactions between local groups of employees during their production activities. The article aims at identifying the features of human capital management, taking into account generational cohorts. To identify the factors affecting the process of attracting, retaining and developing employees of generations X, Y, and Z, the author analyzed international and domestic research, as well as the results of surveys conducted by the recruitment company Hays, consulting companies Deloitte and PwC. Besides, the study relies on the authorʼs own methodology to develop groups of system-forming characteristics of the team and integrate them into the human capital management model. The research findings show that each generation requires special management practice. For generation X, face-to-face live intra-collective communication and training, long-term goal setting, vertical career growth, recognition for individual achievements, autonomous work, minimal control, and traditional employment are important. Generation Y is focused on virtual and face-toface intra-collective communication, intensive training program, short-term goal setting, project work, teamwork, horizontal career growth, continuous feedback from management, a sense of self-importance, diversity, traditional and remote forms of employment. For generation Z, virtual intra-collective communication, short-and longterm online training programs, individualism, multitasking and functional diversity, horizontal career growth, unobtrusive control of the manager, and remote employment are important.
Citation: Nikitochkina, Y.V. (2021). Corporate human capital management in the context of generational theory. Terra Economicus 19(1): 138–151. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606- 2021-19-1-138-151
Acknowledgment: The research is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project № 19-29- 07488).


Keywords: labor collective; human capital; theory of generations; development; management

JEL codes: A30, I21, J24

References:
  • Беляева, С.С. (2008). Где сила не может, там ум поможет. Роль человеческого капитала в развитии предприятия // Креативная экономика 10(22): 120–127. [Belyaeva, S.S. (2008). Where strength can not, there is the mind will help. The role of human capital in enterprise development. Creative Economy 10(22): 120–127. (In Russian.)]
  • Валерина, В. (2018). Практические аспекты управления персоналом с учетом положений теории поколений, с. 38–43 / В: Современные технологии управления персоналом. Сборник трудов V Международной научно-практической конференции. [Valerina, V. (2018). Practical aspects of personnel management taking into account the provisions of the theory of generations, pp. 38–43. Modern Technologies of Personnel Management. Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference. (In Russian.)]
  • Герасимов, Б., Карпова, Т. (2018). Подпроцесс управления человеческим капиталом: сущность, значимость и место в процессе управления персоналом // Вестник Самарского муниципального института управления (4): 112–122. [Gerasimov, B., Karpova, T. (2018). Subprocess of human capital management: the essence, significance and place in the process of personnel management. Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Institute of Management (4): 112–22. (In Russian.)]
  • Гурова, И.М., Евдокимова, С.Ш. (2016). Теория поколений как инструмент анализа, формирования и развития трудового потенциала // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие) (3): 150–159. [Gurova, I.M., Evdokimova, S.Sh. (2016). Theory of generations as a tool for analysis, formation and development of labor potential. MIR (Modernization. Innovations. Development) (3): 150–159. (In Russian.)]
  • Денисенко, М., Варшавская, Е. (2017). Продолжительнсть трудовой жизни в России // Экономический журнал ВШЭ 21(4): 592–622. [Denisenko, M., Varshavskaya, E. (2017). Long working life in Russia. HSE Economic Journal 21(4): 592–622. (In Russian.)]
  • Доброхлеб, В. (2014). Потенциал поколений // Экономический журнал (3): 24–29. [Dobrokhleb, V. (2014). Potential of generations. Economic Journal (3): 24–29. (In Russian.)]
  • Иванова, И.А. (2015). Теория поколений: проблемы обучения и адаптации молодых специалистов в ХХI веке // Транспортное дело России (5): 129–131. [Ivanova, I.A. (2015). Theory of generations: problems of training and adaptation of young specialists in the XXI century. Transport Business of Russia (5): 129–131. (In Russian.)]
  • Капелюшников, Р. (2005). Человеческий капитал России: эволюция и структурные особенности // Вестник общественного мнения (4): 46–55. [Kapelyushnikov, R. (2005). Human capital of Russia: evolution and structural features. Bulletin of Public Opinion (4): 46–55. (In Russian.)]
  • Котомина, О., Широкшина, П. (2019). Особенности удержания креативных сотрудников поколения Y: результаты пилотного исследования // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Менеджмент 18(1): 115–134. [Kotomina, O., Shirokshina, P. (2019). Features of retention of creative employees of generation Y: Results of a pilot study. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Management 18(1): 115–134. (In Russian.)]
  • Латуха, М.О., Хасиева, Д.Д., Веселова, А.С., Шагалкина, М.В., Селивановских, Л.В. (2020). Гендерно-ориентированные практики управления талантливыми сотрудниками в российских компаниях // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Менеджмент 19(1): 34–66. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu08.2020.102 [Latukha, M.O., Khasieva, D.D., Veselova, A.S., Shagalkina, M.V., Selivanovskikh, L.V. (2020). Gender-oriented management practices for talented employees in Russian companies. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Management 19(1): 34–66. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu08.2020.102 (In Russian.)]
  • Лукьянова, А. (2020). Занятость населения старшего возраста (https://isp.hse.ru/data/2020/04/28/1544886314/03%20Lukyanova_Doklad%20KPAD_28-04-2020.pdf – дата обращения: 20.10.2020). [Lukyanova, A. (2020). Employment of the older population (https://isp.hse.ru/data/2020/04/28/1544886314/03%20Lukyanova_Doklad%20KPAD_28-04-2020.pdf – accessed October 20 2020). (In Russian.)]
  • Миронова, О.А. (2020). Теория поколений как фундамент новой парадигмы управления человеческими ресурсами в условиях постиндустриализации экономики // Ученые записки Санкт-Петербургского имени В.Б. Бобкова филиала Российской таможенной академии (1): 73–78. [Mironova, O.A. (2020). Generational theory as the Foundation of a new paradigm of human resource management in the post-industrial economy. Scientific Notes of the St. Petersburg Branch of the Bobkov Russian customs Academy (1): 73–78. (In Russian.)]
  • Никиточкина, Ю.В. (2017). Системообразующие характеристики производственных коллективов в контексте стратегического управления // Горизонты экономики (4): 84–88. [Nikitochkina, Yu.V. (2017). System-forming characteristics of production collectives in the context of strategic management. Horizons of Economics (4): 84–88. (In Russian.)]
  • Никиточкина, Ю.В. (2018). Формирование структуры производственного коллектива в зависимости от стратегического профиля промышленного предприятия // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения 5(9): 4–13. [Nikitochkina, Yu.V. (2018). Forming the structure of the production team depending on the strategic profile of the washed enterprise. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions 5(9): 4–13. (In Russian.)]
  • Одегов, Ю. (2015). Управление талантами – реальность современного менеджмента // Вестник Омского университета. Серия: Экономика (1): 92–99. [Odegov, Yu. (2015). Talent management is the reality of modern management. Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Economy (1): 92–99. (In Russian.)]
  • Самоукина, Н. (2009). Теория поколений и управление персоналом в условиях кризиса // Мотивация и оплата труда (2): 94–101. [Samoukina, N. (2009). Theory of generations and personnel management in a crisis. Motivation and Remuneration (2): 94–101. (In Russian.)]
  • Солдатова, Г.У., Нестик, Т.А., Рассказова, Е.И. Зотова, Е.Ю. (2013). Цифровая компетентность российских подростков и родителей: результаты всероссийского исследования. М.: Фонд Развития Интернет. [Soldatova, G.U., Nestik, T.A., Rasskazova, E.I. Zotova, E.Yu. (2013). Digital competence of Russian teenagers and parents: results of all-Russian research. Moscow: Internet Development Fund. (In Russian.)]
  • Уйманова, М.Е. , Макашева, Ю.С., Герман, М.В. (2013). Теория поколений в системе мотивации персонала // Управление человеческими ресурсами – основа развития инновационной экономики (4): 338–342. [Uymanova, M.E., Makasheva, Y.S., Herman, M.V. (2013). Theory of generations in the system of personnel motivation. Human Resource Management – the Basis of Innovative Economy Development (4): 338–342. (In Russian.)]
  • Черников, Б.В. (2014). Дифференциация трудовых ценностей среди поколений современных работников // Вестник Томского государственного университета (385): 153–158. [Chernikov, B.V. (2014). Differentiation of labor values among generations of modern workers. Bulletin of Tomsk State University (385): 153–158. (In Russian.)]
  • Alsop, R. (2008). The Trophy Kids Grow Up: How the Millennial Generation is Shaping up the Workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C. (2018). Successful digital transformations need a focus on the individual: How does digitalization affect the behaviour of purchasers and team members in related functions? pp. 11–26. In: Digitalisierung im Einkauf. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-16909-1_2
  • Betz, C.L. (2019). Generations X, Y, and Z. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 44: А7–А8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.12.013
  • Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important? Journal of Business Venturing 20(6): 727–746.
  • Cvenkel, N. (2020). Multigenerational workforce and well-being in the twenty-first-century workplace, pp. 191–224. In: Well-Being in the Workplace: Governance and Sustainability Insights to Promote Workplace Health. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance, s.l. Springer.
  • Glass, A. (2007). Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training 39(2): 98–103.
  • Graybill, J.O. (2013). Millennials among the professional workforce in academic libraries: Their perspective on leadership. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40: 10–15.
  • Gursoy, D., Maier, T.A., Chi, C.G. (2008). Generational differences: An examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. International Journal of Hospitality Management 27: 458–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.11.002
  • Hochdörffer, J., Hedler, M., Lanza, G. (2018). Staff scheduling in job rotation environments considering ergonomic aspects and preservation of qualifications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 46: 103–114. doi: 10.1016/ j.jmsy.2017.11.005
  • Kaiser, D.M. (2005). Organizational commitment at Kirtland community college: An analysis of generational differences in the workforce. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
  • Kaplan, M., Sanchez, M., Hoffman, J. (2017). Intergenerational strategies for establishing sustainable work environments. In: Intergenerational Pathways to a Sustainable Society. Perspectives on Sustainable Growth. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47019-1_7
  • Kostanek, E., Khoreva, V. (2018). Multi-generational workforce and its implications for talent retention strategies. Psychology of Retention. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98920-4_10
  • Kraus, M. (2017). Comparing Generation X and Generation Y on their preferred emotional leadership style. Journal of Applied Leadership and Management 5: 62–75.
  • Kucharcikova, A., Tokarcikova, E., Blaskova, M. (2015). Human capital management – Aspect of the human capital efficiency in university education. Social and Behavioral Sciences 177: 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.332
  • Kupperschmidt, B.R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. Health Care Manag 19(1): 65–76.
  • Martin, C.A., Tulgan, B. (2011). Managing Generation Y: Global Citizens Born in the Late Seventies and Early Eighties. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
  • Myers, K.K., Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance. Journal of Business and Psychology 25: 225–238. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7
  • Oberlander, M., Beinicke, A., Bipp, T. (2020). Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers & Education 146: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752
  • OECD (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. (http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33703702.pdf – accessed October 20 2020).
  • Ozkana, M., Solmazb, B. (2015). The changing face of the employees – Generation Z and their perceptions of work. Procedia Economics and Finance 26: 476–483.
  • Rožman, M., Tominc, P. (2014). Upravljanje starostne raznolikosti na delovnih mestih. Management of Age Diversity at the Workplace 60(5-6): 3–11. [Rožman, M., Tominc, P. (2014). Management of age diversity in jobs. Management of Age Diversity at the Workplace 60(5-6): 3–11. (In Slovak.)]
  • Rudolph, C.W., Toomey, E.C., Baltes, B.B. (2017). Considering age diversity in recruitment and selection: An expanded work lifespan view of age management. In: E. Parry, J. McCarthy (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Age Diversity and Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:
  • 10.1057/978-1-137-46781-2_25
  • Seemiller, C., Grace, M. (2015). Generation Z Goes to College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Stratman, M. (2007). A Phenomenological Study into Leadership Attributes Preferred by Generation Y Mexican Americans. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Management in Organizational Leadership. Arizona: D.M. University of Phoenix.
  • Strauss, W., Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of Americaʼs Future, 1584 to 2069. NY: Harper Perennial.
  • Suleman, R., Nelson, B. (2011). Motivating the millennials: Tapping into the potential of the youngest generation. Leader to Leader 62: 39–44.
  • Twenge, J.M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Todayʼs Young Americans are more Confident, Assertive, Entitled and More Miserable than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.
  • Twenge, J.M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy – and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood – and What That Means for the Rest of Us. New York: Atria Books.
  • Veldsman, D. (2018). The Flow@Work Model as a talent retention framework for the knowledge economy. In: M. Coetzee, I. Potgieter, N. Ferreira (eds.) Psychology of Retention. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98920-4_2
  • Webber, S., Donahue, L. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management 27(2): 141–162. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700202
  • Wegge, J., Meyer, B. (2020). Age diversity and age-based faultlines in teams: understanding a Brezel phenomenon requires a Brezel theory. Work, Aging and Retirement 6: 8–14.
  • Weichel, J., Stanic, S., Diaz, J., Frieling, E. (2010). Job rotation – implications for old and impaired assembly line workers. Occup Ergon 9: 67–74.
  • Winnicka–Wejs, A. (2020). Deficits and potentials: How risk involving generational characteristics can be reduced thanks to human capital multigenerationality. Human Resource Management 133(2): 41–56.
  • Wright, P., McMahan, G. (2011). Exploring human capital: putting ‘human’ back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal 21(2): 93–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00165.x
  • Ye, Q., Wang, D., Guo W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: the role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal 37(4): 468–480. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006
  • Ying Yang, Xinchun Niu, Fei Yang, Pingping Hu (2020). Higher education expansion, selections based on non-cognitive abilities and gender differences: The case of China. Frontiers of Education in China 15: 279–312. doi: 10.1007/s11516-020-0013-9
  • Zając, C. (2019). Human Capital Management of contemporary enterprises. Threats and opportunities. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series 136: 687–692.
  • Zemke, R., Raines, C., Filipczak, B. (1999). Generations at work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. New York: AMACOM Books.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606