TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 15 (no. 4),

This article deals with the eco-city concept of the XX century end and the beginning of the XXI century. The model of urban metabolism proposed by Abel Wolman was chosen as the method of analysis. Based on the results of the comparative analysis, we concluded that emphasis of eco-city approaches has shifted over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, emphasis was placed on limiting the consumption of resources, including through the urban and transport planning, while after 2000 the focus was on the limitation of waste generation, the green production and alternative energy development. At the same time, modern eco-cities concepts are becoming more oriented towards human needs and social problems solving. We concluded about the possibilities of applying foreign approaches in the Russian cities and proposed a set of specific measures in the field of the city environmental policy. It is noted that the approaches of territorial development (such as new urbanism, urban villages, transit-oriented development, traditional neighborhood development, pedestrian pockets) were initially practice-oriented and practically do not need adaptation in Russia. However, group of approaches based on green technologies, alternative energetics and energy efficiency, waste recycling and the elimination of accumulated environmental damage are certainly in demand in Russia, but they need adaptation taking into account the Russian natural and climatic characteristics. For Russian cities, we propose the following measures: declaration of transition to the «environmentally sustainable development» model; the development of a mechanism for the solution and prevention of environmental conflicts; the allocation of special ecological and economic cities and territories; launch of the priority national project for the development of environmentally friendly modes of transport; implementation of the road map for the creation of green cities; inclusion in the system of assessment of the activities of municipal authorities of environmental indicators; the restriction of multi-storey buildings construction, the formation of new green areas, etc.

Keywords: eco-city; sustainable city; foreign approaches; application in Russia; urban metabolism; urban development concepts

  • Barinova, V. A. and Lanshina, T. A. (2016). Development of renewable energy sources in Russia and in the world. Russian Entrepreneurship, 17(2), 259–270. (In Russian.)
  • Bartz, D. (2006). Analysis of the congress of new urbanism landscape design principles and social interaction. Dissertation for the Degree of master of landscape architecture. The University of Texas at Arlington.
  • Brednikova, O. and Zaporozhets, O. (2014). The city is in the details. Microurbanism. Collection of articles Moscow: New literary review. (In Russian.)
  • Brunner, P. H. (2007). Reshaping Urban Metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 11–13.
  • Brunner, P. H. and Rechberger, H. (2005). Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
  • Bulow, J. (1986). An economic theory of planned obsolescence.  Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 729–749.
  • Bunning, J., Beattie, C., Rauland, V., Newman, P. (2013). Low-Carbon Sustainable Precincts: An Australian Perspective. Sustainability, 5, 2305–2326.
  • Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Calthorpe, P. and Kelbaugh, D. (1989). The Pedestrian Pocket Book: A New Suburban Design Strategy. New York: Princeton Architectural Press in association with the University of Washington.
  • Cleveland, C. J. and Ruth, M. (1997). When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process? Ecological Economics, 22, 203–223.
  • Crawford, J. H. (2000). Carfree Cities. International Books.
  • Daly, H. (2007). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Selected Essays of Herman Daly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Daly, H. and Farley, J. (2004). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington: Island Press.
  • Frankin, B. J. and Tait, M. (2002). Constructing an Image: The Urban Village Concept in the UK. Planning Theory, 1(3), 250–272.
  • Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Washington: Island Press.
  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Golubchikov, O. (2011). Climate neutral cities: How to make cities less energy and carbon intensive and more resilient to climatic challenges. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
  • Helm, D. and Hepburn, C. (2014). Nature in the Balance: The Economics of Biodiversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Holcombe, R. G. (2004). The New Urbanism Versus the Market Process. The Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2/3), 285–300.
  • Howard, E. (1898). To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. London: Swann Sonnenschein.
  • Howard, E. (1902). Garden Cities of tomorrow. London: Swann Sonnenschein.
  • Illge, L. and Schwarze, R. (2006). A Matter of Opinion: How Ecological and Neoclassical Environmental Economists Think about Sustainability and Economics. German Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin, 619.
  • Ivanov, P. and Kasimova, T. (2017). Urban agenda: It is better not to know the inhabitants. Vedomosti, 4260, February, 10, 2017 (https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/ articles/2017/02/10/677052-zhitelyam-ne-znat). (In Russian.)
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
  • Khovavko, I. (2014). Economic Analyses of Moscow Traffic Jams. Public administration. Electronic Bulletin, 43, 121–134. (In Russian.)
  • Khovavko, I. (2016). Economic analysis of the ecological conflicts in the Russian Federation. Society and Economics, 8, 68–85. (In Russian.)
  • Komarov, V. M. (2015). The Strategy of Economic Development: Is It Time to Update the Paradigm? Economic Policy, 6, 24–39 (http://www.ep.ane.ru/pdf/2015-6/komarov. pdf). (In Russian.)
  • Meadows, D., Randers, J., Meadows, D. and Behrens, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
  • Minx, J., Creutzig, F., Medinger, V., Ziegler, T., Owen, A. and Baiocchi, G. (2011). Developing a pragmatic approach to assess urban metabolism in Europe. Final Report to the European Environment Agency. Berlin: Stockholm Environment Institute & Technische Universität.
  • Newman, P. (1999). Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 219–226.
  • OECD (2010). Green Cities Programme (http://www.oecd.org/regional/greening-cities-regions/46811501.pdf).
  • Pincetl, S., Bunje, P. and Holmesc, T. (2012). An expanded urban metabolism method: Toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 193–202.
  • Register, R. (1987). Ecocity Berkeley. Building Cities for the Healthy Future. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
  • Rudlin, D., Dodd, N., Yates, K. and Falk, N. (1998). Tomorrow: The feasibility of accommodating 75% of new homes in urban areas a peaceful path to urban reform. London: Urban and Economic Development Group.
  • Scott, С. M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan.
  • Shmelev, S. (2012). Ecological Economics: Sustainability in Practice. New York: Springer.
  • Söderbaum, P. (2000). Ecological Economics. A Political Economics Approach to Environment and Development. London: Earthscan.
  • Stefan, A. (2005). The New Urbanism movement: the case of Sweden. University essay from Blekinge Tekniska Högskola.
  • The Prince of Wales Prince Charles (1989). A Vision of Britain: A Personal View of Architecture. London: Doubleday.
  • United Nations (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf).
  • United Nations (1990). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), Sustainable Cities Programme 1990–2000.
  • United Nations (1992). Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Brazil, Rio de Janerio, 3–14 June 1992 (https://sustainabledevelopment. un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf).
  • United Nations (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment And Development. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992 (http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm).
  • United Nations (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, 18 September 2000 (http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ ares552e.pdf).
  • United Nations (2012). The Future We Want, Outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20–22 June 2012 (https:// sustainabledevelopment.un.org/futurewewant.html).
  • United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 (http:// www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E).
  • Voloshinskaya, A. A. and Komarov, V. M. (2015). Evidence-based policy: problems and prospects. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, 90–102. (In Russian.)
  • Vuchic, V. R. (1999). Transportation for Livable Cities. New Brunswick: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.
  • White, R. and Condon, P. (2007). Envisioning a Carbon-Neutral City. Modeling a 100 Year Sustainability Vision for the City of North Vancouver. North Vancouver: Design Centre for Sustainability.
  • Wolman, A. (1965). The Metabolism of Cities. Scientific American, 213, 179–190.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606