Analysis of relationships between the elements of the macroeconomic system for telecommunication service market

Kobylko A.A.
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute RAS (CEMI RAS), Moscow, Russia

TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2017, Vol. 15 (no. 4),

p. 22-32
DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-4-22-3

The paper analyzes the relationship between the parts of the communication service from the systemic economic theory’s perspectives. A system of four linked elements (the tetrad) – «economics – economic policy – economic management – business behavior» in the telecommunications market is analyzed. At the macro level this complex includes: the scientific organizations – the environmental subsystem; the legislative authorities – the processing subsystem; the regulators – the projective subsystem; the telecommunication companies – the objective subsystem. These elements interact with neighboring subsystems two by two. This allows to assess the quality of such relationships to identify weak connection between them. The following pairs with weak connection were identified: project – environmental and environmental – objective subsystems. These features indicate that the objective and the environmental subsystems are in the communication vacuum relative to each other and other subsystems. There is a sequence of weak feedback from the processing system (through the environmental and objective) to projective. Therefore only the direct connections of the system are stable in the macroeconomic complex of telecommunication services. Given such a weak connection, it is evident that the system is misbalanced. The above said prevents the harmonious development of the economic complex and break the chain of interaction between subsystems. We should consider the complex programs for the development of interaction between pairs of subsystems with weak or non-existent connections. Also this problem should be considered as a system, as a single organism, to establish connections and to strike a balance.

Download full text in pdf

Keywords: system economic theory; macrosystem; telecommunication

References:

Bertalanffy, L., von (1956). General System Theory / In: Emery, F. E. (eds.) General System, Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General System Theory, vol. 1, 1–10.
Bodenstein, M. (2013). Equilibrium stability in open economy models. Journal of Macroeconomics, 35, 1–13.
CNews Analitics (2016). Telecom 2016. Analytic report, November 2016. (In Russian.)
Ganichev, N. A. (2013). Scenarios of the Joint Innovative Development of the Radio Electronic Industry and Services Sector. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 24(4), 344–352.
Kamitake, Y. (2009). Fundamental Concepts for Economic Systems Theory. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 50, 75–86. Kleiner, G. B. (2011). Systemic Resource of Economic. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1, 89–100. (In Russian.)
Kleiner, G. B. (2014). State and Economy: Cooperation in the Light of the System Economic Theory. Economic. Taxes. Law, 4, 9–24. (In Russian.)
Kleiner, G. B. (2015). Sustainability of Russian Economy in the Mirror of the System Economic Theory (Part 1). Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 107–123. (In Russian.)
Kleiner, G. and Rybachuk, M. (2016). System Structure of the Economy: Qualitative Time-Space Analysis. Fronteiras, 2, 61–81. Kobylko, A. A. (2016a). Combined Approach to Strategy Building of Operator as a Polysystemic Company. Terra Economicus, 3, 50–62. (In Russian.)
Kobylko, A. A. (2016b). Modern Telecommunication Operators: a Study from the Point of View of the System Economic Theory. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2, 118–124. (In Russian.)
Kornai, J. (1998). The System Paradigm. William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, 278, William Davidson Institute of Michigan. Kornai, J. (2002). The System Paradigm. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 4, 4–22. (In Russian.)
Kornai, J. (2016). The System Paradigm Revisited: Clarification and Additions in the Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Region. Acta Oeconomica, 66(4), 547–596.
Kovbel, A. A. and Evdakova, L. N. (2016). Improving Operational Efficiency in IT Market Sector – Forced Innovations. Russia and Europe: Relationship of Culture and Economy: Materials of The 15th International Scientific-and-Practical Conference, 261–264. Prague: World Press s.r.o. (In Russian.)
Palley, T. I. (2015). The Theory of Global Imbalances: Mainstream Economics vs Structural Keynesianism. Review of Keynesian Economics, 3, 45–62.
Rybachuk, M. A. (2016). System-balanced approach to the strategic management organization on an industrial enterprise. Economic Revival of Russia, 4, 118–133. (In Russian.)
Saadaoui, J. (2015). Global Imbalances: Should We Use Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rates? Economic Modelling, 47, 383–398.
Sayfieva, S. N. (2017). Theoretical Foundations of the Material and Financial Balance of Economy in Changing Economic Conditions. Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 25–39. (In Russian.)
Strategy 2015–2020 of Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Sciences (2015). SibSUTIS (https://www.sibsutis.ru/about/strategiya%20razvitiya%20SibGUTI – Access date: 09.08.2017). (In Russian.)
Volodina, E. E. (2016). Economic and Methodical Tools of Frequency Spectrum Management. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 3, 124–135. (In Russian.)
Volodina, Е. Е., Devyatkin, Е. Е. and Sukhodolskaya, Т. А. (2016). The Analysis of the Russian’s Spectrum Auctions Results. T-Comm, 10(7), 87–92. (In Russian.)
Wu, J. (2013). Imbalance and Balance of China’s Economy – a Perspective of Policy Combination. Journal of Shanghai Finance University, 3, 66–76.
Zaytseva, Yu. O., Korovushkina, A. S. and Rybachuk, M. A. (2016). System Balance Evaluation of the National Economy by Kinds of Economic Activities. Strategic Planning and Evolution of Enterprises. Section 1: Materials of the 17th Russian Symposium, 69–72. Moscow, CEMI RAS Publ. (In Russian.)

Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606