SFeDu
  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2024
  • No 1
  • Collective action in climate policy implementation: The role of citizens

Collective action in climate policy implementation: The role of citizens


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 22 (no. 1),

We assess the role of citizens in global climate policy using empirical data from a range of sociological studies. The scale of the environment challenge, with climate change issues as its essential part, usually implies that countries and organizations are treated as the key actors whose influence on climate regulation is significant. Meanwhile, in recent years, scholars and experts pay increasing attention to citizen behavior change. On the personal level, behavior change goals may involve the measures for reducing carbon footprint, as well as pressure on policymakers to encourage climate regulations. The purpose of this article is to assess the current role of citizens (their awareness, attitudes to climate change, and willingness to act) in global climate policy. Our theoretical framework is the theory of collective action and its modifications. We highlight the peculiarities of collective action to counteract climate change, as well as complementary approaches which represent the solution of the “social dilemma” regarding environmental protection from different perspectives. Approaches to citizen engagement in climate change adaptation may vary (instrumental, polycentric, ethical). We found that currently the instrumental approach is being implemented. Our results show that currently citizens’ readiness for collective action on climate change issues is not high. We also found a wide variance across countries and their groups in terms of citizen engagement, and a rather intensive application of behavioral economics tools. We conclude that the role of citizens’ collective action in climate policy implementation addresses such underlying concerns as ethical responsibility towards environmental sustainability and public attention to environmental issues on different levels of the economy.
Citation: Kurbatova M.V., Donova I.V. (2024). Collective action in climate policy implementation: The role of citizens. Terra Economicus 22(1), 62–80 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-1-62-80
Acknowledgment: The study was funded by the State Assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (FSRZ-2024-0003).


Keywords: climate policy; environmental issues; social dilemma; collective action; interest groups; polycentric approach; environmental ethics

JEL codes: Q54; А13

References:
  • Андерссон К., Хиландер Ф., Нилен К. (2021). Климатическая психология: как добиться устойчивого развития. Минск: Попурри. [Andersson, K., Hylander, F., Nylen, K. (2021). Climatic Psychology: How to Achieve Development. Minsk: Popurri (in Russian)].
  • Боулз С. (2011). Микроэкономика. Поведение, институты и эволюция. М.: Дело. [Bowles, S. (2011). Microeconomics. Behavior, Institutions and Evolution. Moscow: Delo Publ. (in Russian)].
  • Данилов-Данильян В.И., Катцов В.М., Порфирьев Б.Н. (2020). Проблема климатических изменений – поле сближения и взаимодействия естественных и социогуманитарных наук. Вестник Российской академии наук 90(10), 914–925. [Danilov-Danilyan, V., Kattsov, V., Porfiriev, B. (2020). The problem of climate change – The field of convergence and interaction of natural and socio-humanitarian sciences. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 90(10), 914–925 (in Russian)]. EDN: YKQTJT
  • Курбатова М.В., Пыжев А.И. (2023). Низкоуглеродная экономика как институциональный проект: проблема и цели. Journal of Institutional Studies 15(2), 6–23. [Kurbatova, M., Pyzhev, A. (2023). The low-carbon economy as an institutional project: Challenges and objectives. Journal of Institutional Studies 15(2), 6–23 (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.006-023
  • Олсон М. (1996). Логика коллективных действий. Общественные блага и теория групп. М.: ФЭИ. [Olson, M. (1996). The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Moscow: Fund for Economic Initiative Publ. (in Russian)].
  • Олсон М. (1998). Возвышение и упадок народов. Экономический рост, стагфляция, социальный склероз. Новосибирск: ЭКОР. [Olson, M. (1998). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. Novosibirsk: EKOR Publ. (in Russian)].
  • Остром Э. (2010). Теория рационального выбора коллективного действия. Бихевиористский подход. Обращение президента американской политологической ассоциации, 1997 г. Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления (1), 5–52. [Ostrom, E. (2010). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. Public Administration Issues (1), 5–52 (in Russian)].
  • Сен А. (2004). Развитие или свобода. М.: Новое издательство. [Sen, A. (2004). Development as Freedom. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo Publ. (in Russian)].
  • Талер Р., Санстейн К. (2017). Nudge. Архитектура выбора. Как улучшить наши решения о здоровье, благосостоянии и счастье. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер. [Thaler, R., Sunstein, C.(2017). Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Farber Publ. (in Russian)].
  • Шваб К. (2022). Капитализм всеобщего блага: новая модель мировой экономики. М.: Эксмо. [Schwab, K. (2016). Stakeholder Capitalism. A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet. Moscow: Eksmo Publ. (in Russian)].
  • Cole D. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Articles by Maurer Faculty. 1415. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1415 (accessed on 05.05. 2023)
  • Müller, G., Dietrich, A., Schoenle, R. (2021). The expectations channel of climate change: Implications for monetary policy. Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2021: Climate Economics, ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Kiel, Hamburg. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/242446/1/vfs-2021-pid-50466.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2023)
  • Ostrom, E. (2014). Polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance 15(1), 97–134.
  • Ostrom, V. (1999). Polycentricity. Part 1. In: McGinnis, M. (ed.) Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 52–74.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606