SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

Bank loans vs debt within social networks: The case of Central Asia


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 20 (no. 3),

In the countries of Central Asia, rituals of weddings, funerals and other important events play a significant role. Many complex ceremonies impose a financial burden on households, which is alarming for the authorities, who see the ritual economy as a threat of the citizens’ impoverishment. The reputation of families and the desire to confirm social status in the eyes of relatives, neighbors and friends doom households to conspicuous extravagance. This article uses empirical evidence collected through interviews with the residents of Central Asian countries in 2021–2022. The ritual economy in the countries of Central Asia is a vivid example of social pressure on the financial behavior of families. Spending during the performance of rituals is a kind of self-presentation of households. A significant part of the inhabitants of the Central Asian region is not able to bear the burden of expenses associated with the performance of rituals without borrowing. Even despite the fact that, for example, for weddings they begin to prepare much in advance. However, own savings, as a rule, are not sufficient. The way out is a formal or informal loan. The article describes how debt obligations are organized under a formal agreement with a bank loan or informal borrowing from friends and relatives, and what drives household choice. The expansion of bank lending is driven by two reasons. The first is the attractiveness of bank loans due to the fact that they are not personalized and do not imply a feeling of personal gratitude to those who lend money. The second reason is the growth in defaults on loans from relatives and friends, which causes a reduction in the practice of using social networks as sources of lending. Non-payments of loans indicate a reduction in the ability of the social environment to control the behavior of its members.
Citation: Barsukova S. (2022). Bank loans vs debt within social networks: The case of Central Asia. Terra Economicus 20(3), 87–97 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-3-87-97
Acknowledgment: This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project «The increase in expenditure on life-cycle rituals in the Central Asian societies: Social stakes and economic consequences (1980–2020)», № 20-59-22001). The sponsor influenced neither the research design nor the interpretation of the results.


Keywords: credit; ritual cost; debt obligations; diaspora; ritual economy; Central Asia

JEL codes: D10, D12, Z1, Z23

References:
  • Абашин С.Н. (1999). Вопреки «здравому смыслу»? (К вопросу о «рациональности/ иррациональности» ритуальных расходов в Средней Азии). Вестник Евразии (1–2), 87– 107. [Abashin, S. (1999). Contrary to “common sense”? (On the question of the “rationality/ irrationality” of ritual expenses in Central Asia). Bulletin of Eurasia (1–2), 87–107 (in Russian)].
  • Абашин С.Н. (2015). Возвращение домой: семейные и миграционные сценарии в Узбекистане. Al Imperio (3), 125–165. [Abashin, S. (2015). Returning home: Family and migration scenarios in Uzbekistan. Al Imperio (3), 125–165 (in Russian)].
  • Азимова Н.Х. (2020). Ритуальная экономика: на примере свадебных обрядов. Наманган, 2018 год. Общество, гендер и семья в Центральной Азии (4), 87–106. [Asimova, N. (2020). Ritual economy: on the example of wedding ceremonies. Namangan, 2018. Society, Gender and Family in Central Asia (4), 87–106 (in Russian)].
  • Барсукова С.Ю. (2001). Вынужденное доверие сетевого мира. Политические исследования (2), 52–60. [Barsukova, S. (2001). Enforceable trust of the networked world. Political Studies (2), 52–60 (in Russian)].
  • Барсукова С.Ю. (2004). Реципрокные взаимодействия. Сущность, функции, специфика. Социологические исследования (9), 20–30. [Barsukova, S. (2004). Reciprocal interactions. Essence, functions, specifics. Sociological Studies (9), 20–30 (in Russian)].
  • Барсукова С.Ю. (2005). Сетевые обмены российских домохозяйств: опыт эмпирического исследования. Социологические исследования (8), 34–45. [Barsukova, S. (2005). Network exchanges of Russian households: empirical research experience. Sociological Studies (8), 34–45 (in Russian)].
  • Бурстин Д. (1993). Сообщества потребления. THESIS (3), 231–254. [Boorstin, D. (1993). Consumption communities. THESIS (3), 231–254 (in Russian)].
  • Вебер М. (2016). Хозяйство и общество: очерки понимающей социологии. М.: Издательский дом ВШЭ. [Weber, M. (2016). Economy and Society: Essays on Interpretive Sociology. Moscow: HSE Publishing House (in Russian)].
  • Веблен Т. (2021). Теория праздного класса. М.: АСТ. [Veblen, T. (2021). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Moscow: ACT (in Russian)].
  • Лейбенстайн Х. (1993). Эффект присоединения к большинству, эффект сноба и эффект Веблена в теории покупательского спроса. В кн.: Гальперин В. (ред.) Теория потребительского поведения и спроса. СПб.: Экономическая школа, c. 304–325. [Leibenstein, H. (1993). The effect of joining the majority, the snob effect and the Veblen effect in the theory of consumer demand. In: Galperin, V. (ed.) Theory of consumer behavior and demand. St. Petersburg: Economic School, pp. 304–325. (in Russian)].
  • Поляков С.П. (1989). Традиционализм в современном среднеазиатском обществе. М.: Всесоюз. о-во «Знание», Центр. дом науч. атеизма, 112 с. [Polyakov, S. (1989). Traditionalism in Modern Central Asian Society. Moscow: Knowledge Publ., 112 p. (in Russian)].
  • Сухарева О.А. (1976). Квартальная община позднефеодального города Бухары (в связи с историей кварталов). М.: Вост. лит., 366 с. [Sukhareva, O. (1976). The Quarterly Community of the Late Feudal City of Bukhara (On the History of Quarters). Moscow: East Literature Publ., 366 p. (in Russian)].
  • Хушкадамова Х.О. (2010). Семейно-брачные отношения в современном таджикистанском обществе. Социология власти (3), 79–88. [Khushkadamova, H. (2010). Family and marriage relations in modern Tajik society. Sociology of Power (3), 79–88 (in Russian)].
  • Хушкадамова Х.О. (2011). Национальные обряды в современном Таджикистане. Социологические исследования (5), 78–81. [Khushkadamova, H. (2011). National rituals in modern Tajikistan. Sociological Studies (5), 78–81 (in Russian)].
  • Юдин Г. (2015). Моральная природа долга и формирование ответственного заемщика. Вопросы экономики (3), 28–72. [Yudin, G. (2015). The moral nature of debt and the making of responsible debtor. Voprosy Ekonomiki (3), 28–72 (in Russian)].
  • Borisova, E. (2021). “Our traditions will kill us!”: Negotiating marriage celebrations in the face of legal regulation of tradition in Tajikistan. Oriente Moderno 100(2), 147–171.
  • Cleuziou, J. and McBrien, J. (2021). Marriage quandaries in Central Asia. Oriente Moderno 100(2), 121–146.
  • Kakhkharov, J. and Ahunov, M. (2022). Do migrant remittances affect household spending? Focus on wedding expenditures. Empirical Economics 63(2), 979–1028.
  • Trevisani, T. (2016). Modern weddings in Uzbekistan: Ritual change from “above” and from “below”. Central Asian Survey 35(1), 61–75.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606