TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 18 (no. 1),

The article focuses on a simple model of economic growth: a modification of the fixed capital accumulation equation. Besides, we introduce the traditional assumption that labor productivity is a power-based production function of capital strength. The model has shown that the growth of capital intensity, which identifies technological progress, does not automatically lead to the stimulation of economic growth. For such incentives, a rather strict condition must be met, which is that the power parameter θ in the production function must be greater than one; otherwise, technological progress, paradoxically, constrains economic growth. The presence of the condition θ > 1 is called the technological effect of scale since in this case, and there is a wide replication of new technologies, which leads to an accelerated increase in labor productivity. An econometric check of the presence of this condition for several countries showed that it was not obvious. As it turned out, only Russia, Canada, the United States, and France had a technological scale effect; the other sample countries – Japan, Italy, Australia, and the United Kingdom – had the opposite condition: θ < 1. To explain the scale effect, the authors put forward the hypothesis that there are two drivers of development – industrial and territorial. An industry driver is a cluster of high-tech industries (such as aircraft manufacturing and nuclear power) that are generated by enterprises with high productivity. The territorial driver assumes a vast territory of the country, which allows replicating the products of the industry driver widely. The idea is put forward that Russia has a significant economic advantage due to its technological economies of scale, which creates objective conditions for the effective implementation of high technologies.
Citation: Balatsky, E. V., Yurevich, M. A. (2020). Technological economies of scale and economic growth. Terra Economicus, 18(1), 43–57. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-1-43-57

Keywords: economic growth; capital intensity; technological economies of scale; technological progress

  • Acemoglu, D. (2003). Labor and capital augmenting technical change. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (1), 1–37.
  • Balatsky, E. V. (2019). Global challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Terra Economicus, 17 (2), 6–22. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-2-6-22. (In Russian.)
  • Bello, W. (2006). The capitalist conjuncture: over-accumulation, financial crises, and the retreat from globalization. Third World Quarterly, 27 (8), 1345–1367.
  • Broadberry, S. N., Irwin, D. A. (2006). Labor productivity in the United States and the United Kingdom during the nineteenth century. Explorations in Economic History, 43 (2), 257–279.
  • Caselli, F. (2005). Accounting for Cross-Country Income Differences, pp. 679–741 / In: Durlauf, P. A., Steven, N. (Eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1, Part A. Elsevier.
  • Dementyev, V. E. (2011). Investment problems of innovation pause in the economy. Problemy prognozirovaniya, (4), 13–27. (In Russian.)
  • Dollar, D. (1990). Economic reform and allocative efficiency in Chinaʼs state-owned industry. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39 (1), 89–105.
  • Ezzahid, E., Nihou, A. (2017). Capital deepening and efficiency in Morocco. MPRA Paper № 82143 (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7ce8/a96a40a5c6449ce9e54ea94f28175e105698.pdf – Access Date: 12.02.2020).
  • Jefferson, G. H., Rawski, T. G., Zhang, Y. (2008). Productivity growth and convergence across Chinaʼs industrial economy. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 6 (2), 121–140.
  • Klump, R., de La Grandville, O. (2000). Economic growth and the elasticity of substitution: Two theorems and some suggestions. American Economic Review, 90 (1), 282–291.
  • Knoblach, M., Stöckl, F. (2019). What determines the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor? A literature review. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper № 1784 (https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3339171 – Access Date: 12.02.2020).
  • Kovalevskaya, M. S. (2017). Economic model and problems of its application. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii, (4), 95–104. (In Russian.)
  • Kulisher, I. M. (2012). History of economic life in Western Europe, Vols. 1-2. Chelyabinsk: Ekonomika, Obshchestvo, 1030 p. (In Russian.)
  • Malawi, A. I., AlMansi, M. (2014). Economic Globalization and Labor Productivity: An Application of Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds Testing Approach. International Journal of Business and Statistical Analysis, 1, 49–55.
  • Mankiw, N. G., Phelps, E. S., Romer, P. M. (1995). The growth of nations. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1, 275–326.
  • Piketty, T. (2015). Capital in the XXI century. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 592 p. (In Russian.)
  • Polterovich, V. M. (2009). The innovation pause hypothesis and the strategy of modernization. Voprosy ekonomiki, (6), 4–23. (In Russian.)
  • Romer, P. (1990). Are nonconvexities important for understanding growth? National Bureau of Economic Research № w3271 (https://www.nber.org/papers/w3271.pdf – Access Date: 12.02.2020).
  • Ryazanov, V. T. (2014). Development of the theory of crises under capitalism: political economic traditions and modernity. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii, (4), 59–70. (In Russian.)
  • Savina, T. N. (2010). Innovation pause as a reason for cyclical economic development. Nacionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost, (9), 46–52. (In Russian.)
  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70 (1), 65–94.
  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), 312–320.
  • Uzawa, H. (1971). On a two-sector model of economic growth, pp. 19–26 / In: Hahn, F. H. (ed.) Readings in the Theory of Growth. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Wolff, E. N. (1991). Capital formation and productivity convergence over the long term. The American Economic Review, 81 (3), 565–579.
  • Zamulin, O. A., Sonin, K. I. (2019). Economic growth: the 2018 Nobel prize and lessons for Russia. Voprosy ekonomiki, (1), 11–36. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606