SFeDu
  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2019
  • No 1
  • Goals and objectives of language policy and problems of socio-economic development of Russia

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF LANGUAGE POLICY AND PROBLEMS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 17 (no. 1),

Citation: Kadochnikov, D. V. (2019). Goals and objectives of language policy and problems of socio-economic development of Russia. Terra Economicus, 17(1), 96–111. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-1-96-111

The paper presents an analysis of Russian federal laws and state programs with a focus on the stated principles and objectives of language policy. Key questions posed in the paper include the following ones: How are the goals and objectives of the language policy formulated, and how implementable are they, taking into account the formulations used? To what extent the goals, objectives and activities declared meet the needs of socio-economic development of the country and the welfare of its citizens? It should be noted that texts of normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, which determine the language policy and establish the ways of its implementation, only indirectly refer to the ultimate goal of language policy (that is the welfare of citizens and of the society as a whole, the full realization of human potential). The choice of wording in the documents, which are fundamental for the Russian language policy, implies that both in the mass consciousness and in the political discourse some very mythologized and simplified ideas about the goals and objectives of language policy are tenacious and popular. The formulation of the goals and objectives of language policy in normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, the choice of ways to implement these goals and objectives in the government programs do not allow to say that the potential of language policy as the tool of social and economic development of the country, ensuring social and economic interests of its citizens, is fully realized by the participants of the normsetting process.


Keywords: economics of language policy; economics of language; economic development; Russia

References:
  • Athanasiou, E., Moreno-Ternero J., and Weber S. (2016). Language Learning and Com-municative Benefits, pp. 212–230 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Hand-book of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Blommaert, J. (2012). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Butaeva, K., Weber, S. and Davydov, D. (2016). Language, Culture, Migration, and Con-flicts: Projection into Economic Field. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta [Herald of Moscow University]. Series 6: Economics, (1), 3–21.
  • Casey, T. and Dustmann, C. (2008). Intergenerational Transmission of Language Capital and Economic Outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 660–687.
  • Gabszewicz, J., Ginsburgh, V., and Weber, S. (2011). Bilingualism and Communicative Benefits. Annals of Economics and Statistics, (101/102), 271–286.
  • Gal, S. (1989). Language and Political Economy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 345–367.
  • Ginsburgh, V., and Weber, S. (2014). Culture, Languages, and Economics, pp. 507–539 / In: V. Ginsburgh and D. Throsby (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. New York: Elsevier.
  • Ginsburgh, V., Ortuño-Ortin, I., and Weber, S. (2007). Learning foreign languages. Theo-retical and empirical implications of the Selten and Pool model. Journal of Economic Be-havior and Organization, 64, 337–347.
  • Ginsburgh, V., Weber, S., and Weyers, S. (2011). The economics of literary translation: Some theory and evidence. Poetics, 39, 228–246.
  • Gradirovski, S., and Esipova, N. (2008). Russia’s Language Could Be Ticket in for Mi-grants. Gallup.com, November 28. (http://www.gallup.com/poll/112270/russias-lan-guage-could-ticket-migrants.aspx).
  • Grin, F. (1994). The Economics of Language: Match or Mismatch? International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 15(1), 25–42.
  • Heilbron, J. (2016). Translation: Economic and Sociological Perspectives, pp. 373–402 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Heller, M. (2013). Language as Resource in the Globalized New Economy, pp. 349–365 / In: N. Coupland (ed.) The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blaskwell.
  • Holden, N. (2016). Economic Exchange and Business Language in the Ancient World: An Exploratory Review, pp. 290–311 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • John, A. (2016). Dynamic Models of Language Evolution: The Economic Perspective, pp. 101–120 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kadochnikov, D. (2016). Language Policy: An Economics Perspective. Voprosy Eko-nomiki, (2), 128–140. (In Russian.)
  • Kadochnikov, D. (2016). Languages, Regional Conflicts and Economic Development: Russia, pp. 538–580 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Eco-nomics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kadochnikov, D. (2017). Language Policy and Urban Economy: A Review of Federal and Saint Petersburg Legal Acts, pp. 157–178 / In: The Almanac of the Center for the Study of Economic Culture. Moscow – St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publishing. (In Russian.)
  • Laitin, D. (1988). Language Games. Comparative Politics, 20(3), 289–302.
  • Laitin, D. (1993). The Game Theory of Language Regimes. International Political Sci-ence Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 14(3), 227–239.
  • Marusenko, M. (2013). Internal language imperialism of the USA. USA – Canada. Eco-nomics, politics, culture, (10), 35–48. (In Russian.)
  • Marusenko, M. (2014). External language imperialism of the USA. USA – Canada. Eco-nomics, politics, culture, (6), 31–44. (In Russian.)
  • Melitz, J. (2016). English as a Global Language, pp. 583–615 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Parijs, P. (2000). The Ground Floor of the World: On the Socio-Economic Consequences of Linguistic Globalization. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 21(2), 217–233.
  • Reksulak, M., Shughart, W., and Tollison, R. (2004). Economics and English: Language Growth in Economic Perspective. Southern Economic Journal, 71(2), 232–259.
  • Ricento, T. (2013). Language Policy and Globalization, pp. 123–141 / In: N. Coupland (ed.) The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blaskwell.
  • Rubinstein, A. (2000). Economics and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T., and Phillipson, R. (2013). The Global Politics of Language: Mar-kets, Maintenance, Marginalization, or Murder?, pp. 77–100 / In: N. Coupland (ed.) The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blaskwell.
  • Smith, A. (2016). Dynamic Models of Language Evolution: The Linguistic Perspective, pp. 61–100 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Uriarte, J-R. (2016).A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Minority Language Use in Multilin-gual Societies, pp. 689–711 / In: In: V. Ginsburgh and S.
  • Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Hand-book of Economics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Weber, S., and Davydov, D. (2017). Societal and economic effects of linguistic diversity. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (11), 50–62. (In Russian.)
  • Wright, S. (2016). Language Choices: Political and Economic Factors in Three European States, pp. 447–488 / In: V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Eco-nomics and Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606