EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AUCTIONS IN RUSSIA
Vladimir V. MELNIKOV
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Chair of the Department of Regional Economy and Public Administration, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Associate Professor, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Chair of the Department of Regional Economy and Public Administration, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Associate Professor, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Olga A. LUKASHENKO
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Regional Economy and Public Administration, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Novosibirsk, Russia
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Regional Economy and Public Administration, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, Novosibirsk, Russia
TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2019, Vol. 17 (no. 1),
Citation: Melnikov, V. V., and Lukashenko, O. A. (2019). Evolution of public procurement auctions in Russia. Terra Economicus, 17(1), 150–173. DOI: 10.23683/20736606-2019-17-1-150-173
Reverse auctions in public procurement have become an important stage, shaping the modern “showcase” of Russian state contractual system. The formal rules that determine conduct of economic entities in this field tend to be an essential factor underlying development of an efficient competitive environment in the public procurement quasi-market, which, other conditions being equal, facilitates growth of well-being for both consumers and producers in Russia. The paper focuses on the evolution of auction technologies and the underlying legal and regulatory framework in the modern Russia. A detailed comparative analysis of various auctions methods used in public procurement in Russia is presented to highlight the rationale of their transformation. Some formal rules are highlighted that contributed to attaining a controlled uniformity of procurement mechanisms, which have led to better predictability and attractiveness of the new market for its participants, and shaped framework for fighting corruption in the public sector. The pressing factors of corruption and quality assurance in public procurement are addressed. The issue is becoming of particular importance since, due to its current administrative reform, Russia is reviewing its offer for joining the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement. The sequence of technological measures in public and municipal procurement, stages and timeline of procurement procedures are detailed. The role of digitalizing public procurement in order to enhance transparency in this segment of economic operations is discussed. The authors have performed a comparative analysis of different types of e-auctions within the federal regulatory environment in Russia. Any robustness and balance improvement in procurement procedure selection can be expected only after mandatory and synchronous electronification of all methods of public procurement in the Russian Federation.
Keywords: auction; public procurement; government regulation; economic policy; effectiveness of the contractual system
References:
- Anchishkina, O. (2017). Contract institutions in the Russian economy: The sphere of state, municipal and regulated procurement. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (11), 93–110. (In Rus-sian.)
- Balaeva, O., and Yakiovlev, A. (2017). Estimation of costs in Russian public procure-ment system // International Journal of Public Procurement Management, 10(1), 70–88.
- Belokrylov, K. (2017). Public procurement reform in Russia: ways to reduce the risk of corruption // International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(8), 127–139.
- Choi, I. (2003). Long and winding road to the government procurement agreement: Korea’s accession experience. Options for Global Trade Reform. A view from the Asia-Pacific. – Cam-bridge University Press, 2003, pp. 249-269.
- Detkova, P., Podkolzina, E., and Tkachenko, A. (2018). Corruption, Centralization and Competition. Evidence from Russian Public Procurement // International Journal of Public Administration, 41(5–6), 414–434.
- Flynn, A. (2018). Integrating the implementation of SME-friendly policy in public pro-curement // Policy Studies, 239(4), 422–442.
- Golovschinsky, K. I., and Shamrin, A. T. (2011). The basic directions of creation and development of an integrated federal contract system in the Russian Federation: PreprintWP8 / 2011/02. Moscow: Publishing. House School of Economics, 60 p. (In Russian.)
- Hyytinen, A., Lundberg, S., and Toivanen, O. (2018). Design of public procurement auc-tions: evidence from cleaning contracts // RAND Journal of Economics, 49(2), 398–426.
- Kettunen, J., and Kivak, Y. (2018). Scheduling Public requests for proposals: Models and Insights // Production and Operation Management, 27(7), 1271–1290.
- Khanin, G. I. (2012). The economic history of Russia in recent times, vol. 3. The Russian economy in 1992–1998. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House “Sodeystvie–XXI vek”, 398 p. (In Russian.)
- Kornilov, P. (2012). Issues of drawing, approving and concluding contracts in open auctions in the electronic form. Public and municipal procurement – 2011, pp. 211–228 / In: Collection of papers, the VI All-Russian Practical Conference-Workshop. Moscow: “Law” Publishing House”. (In Russian.)
- Makovleva, E. (2018). Tools and methods for resistance to unfair execution of a govern-ment contract // Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 13(3), 62–81. (In Russian.)
- Mavlyukeev, V. (2013). Contractual system in procurement. Novosibirsk State Technical University Inform, (5), 6. (In Russian.)
- Melnikov, V. (2011). Is everything OK with the law on public and municipal procure-ment? ECO, (1), 170–178. (In Russian.)
- Melnikov, V. (2012). Electronic public procurement: a year later. ECO, (5), 174–187. (In Russian.)
- Melnikov, V. (2015). State regulation of national economy: textbook. Мoscow: Omega-L, 338 p. (In Russian.)
- Melnikov, V. V. (2008). Institutional transformation of the government procurement mechanism in post-Soviet Russia. Novosibirsk: Publ. House of the Novosibirsk State Techni-cal University. (In Russian.)
- Ostrovnaya, M., and Podkolzina, E. (2015). Antitrust enforcement in public procure-ment: the case of Russia // Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 11(2), 331–352.
- Ostrovnaya, M., and Podkolzina, E. (2018). Restrictions of competition: The case of Rus-sian public procurement. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (2), 56–73. (In Russian.)
- Pismennaya, Ye. (2010). Stealing a trillion. Vedomosti, (206). (In Russian.)
- Popa, M. (2018). What do good governments actually do? An analysis using European procurement data // European Political Science Review, 10(1), 369–391.
- Rymanov, A. (2014). Public procurement methods in Russia // Actual Problems of Eco-nomics, 158(8), 101–106.
- Seredintsev, D. (2010). Electronic auctions: the implementation practice. Klerk.ru(http://www.klerk.ru/boss/articles/186017 – Accessed on March 21, 2017. (In Russian.)
- Shadrina, E., and Romanova, I. (2017). Sustainable public procurement: international experience // Public Administration Issues, (1), 149–172.
- Sirotkina, N., and Pavlovskaya, S. (2018). Public Procurement in Russia: What Hinders Innovations? // International Journal of Public Administration, 41(5–6), 435–445.
- Tovkailo, M. (2010). No punishments for budget embezzlement in Russia. Vedomosti, (209). (In Russian.)
- Tucker, P. (2014). $180 Million for an F-35 – What We Could Buy Instead // The Fiscal Times, November 14.
- Yakovlev, A., Tkachenko, A., Demidova, O., and Balaeva, O. (2015). The Impact of Dif-ferent Regulatory Regimes on the Effectiveness of Public Procurement // International Journal of Public Administration, 38(1), 796–814.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606