• Home
  • Issues
  • 2018
  • No 1
  • Regional development: addressing the problems of building and realization of scientific and technological capacities


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 1),

The relevance of the study is due to the fact that the current economic state of the Russian regions is characterized by a number of problems of innovation and technological development and their significant differentiation. The most important question is who and what should become the driving force for the development of regions. The concept of the «triple helix» offers modern mechanisms of interaction between the state, business and universities as a driving force. At the same time, universities begin to play an increasingly important role in innovation processes, and their status and influence as subjects of socio-economic development are growing. In this paper, the entrepreneurial university is characterized as a key subject of the «triple helix» model, which plays a central role in the formation of the scientific and technical potential of the regions and in the transition of the subjects of the Russian Federation to innovative development. Recognizing this fact state forms the Russian system of higher education on new principles singling out groups of status universities and additionally financing them. This should contribute to the formation of a modern knowledge space in regions of different types that have different scientific and technical potentials, and on this basis to ensure regional development. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the interrelationships between the socio-economic development of regions (reflected by the GRP per capita indicator) and their scientific and technical potential characterizing the state ofthe knowledge (scientific and educational) space, the most important subjects of which are universities. As a result of the study, groups of regions are distinguished those are similar in terms of socio-economic development and the state of scientific and technical potential, as well as the role of universities in the formation of their knowledge space.

Keywords: triple helix model; knowledge space; university; regional development; scientific and technical potential


Babkina, E. V. and Sergeev, V. A. (2011). The Triple Helix of Innovative Development: The Experience of the USA and Europe, Opportunities for Russia. Innovations, 12, 68–78. (In Russian.)

Belokrylova, O. S. and Pogosyan, N. V. (2015). Innovative development of universities: an organizational and economic approach. Journal of economic regulation, 6(2), 6–17. (In Russian.)

Belokrylova, O. S. and Pogosyan, N. V. (2016). Institutional component of the innovation infrastructure of the university as a resource for strategic development. Journal of economic regulation, 7(1), 84–92. (In Russian.)

Belyakov, S. A. and Krasnova, G. A. (2016). Evaluation of the contribution of the education system to the socio-economic development of the region: international trends and Russian experience. University management: practice and analysis, 3, 8–15. (In Russian.)

Botot, S. and Satinsky, D. (2011). The Triple Helix Model in the Regional Development of Great Britain, the USA and Russia. Innovations, 4, 43–46. (In Russian.)

Butler, D. and Gibson, D. (2013). Research universities in the structure of the regional innovation system: the experience of Austin, Texas. Foresight, 7(2), 42–57. (In Russian.)

Chernikov, A. A. (2014). Economic View of a Modern University. Economics of Education, 3, 28–33. (In Russian.)

Clark, B. (2011). The creation of entrepreneurial universities: organizational directions of transformation. Moscow: Publishing House of Higher School of Economics, 240 p. (In Russian.)

Drobot, D. A., Drobot, P. N. and Uvarov, A. F. (2011). The prevailing role of universities in the Triple Helix Model. Innovations, 4, 93–96. (In Russian.)

Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The Endless Transition: A ‘Triple Helix’ of University Industry Government Relations. Minerva, 36(3), 203–208.

Galushkina, M. (2006). Entrepreneurs in the market of ideas. Expert, 17, 48–52. (In Russian.)

Golovko, N. V., Degtyareva, V. V. and Madyukova, S. A. (2014). Entrepreneurial University and the of the Triple Helix Theory. Higher Education in Russia, 8–9, 46–53. (In Russian.)

Grudzinsky, A. O., Bedny, B. I. and Plekhova, Yu. O. (2012). The role and structure of innovative entrepreneurial education in the research university. University Management, 3, 56–63. (In Russian.)

Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A. and Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.

Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged (2007). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (http://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/highereducationandregionsglobally competitivelocallyengaged.htm – Accessed on June 10 2017).

Itskowitz, G. (2010). Triple Helix. Universities – enterprises – the state. Innovations in action. Tomsk: Tomsk State Publishing House of University of Management Systems and Radioelectronics, 238 p. (In Russian.)

Itskowitz, G. (2011). The Triple Helix Model. Innovations, 4, 5–10. (In Russian.)

Karayannis, E. and Grigorudis, E. (2016). The four-linked spiral of innovation and «smart specialization»: knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight, 1, 31–42. (In Russian.)

Karpov, A. (2017). The modern university as the driver of economic growth: models and mission. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 58–76. (In Russian.)

Katukov, D. D. (2013). Network interactions in the innovation economy: the Triple Helix Model. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2, 112–121. (In Russian.)

Konstantinov, G. N. and Filonovich, S. R. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial university. Education issues, 1, 49–62. (In Russian.)

Lavrovsky, B. L. and Luzin, R. S. (2013). On the construction of an innovation-investment rating of Russian regions. Spatial Economics, 2, 87–102. (In Russian.)

Leonard, K. (2016). Spatial development and innovation in Russia. Foresight, 3, 30–33. (In Russian.)

Leshukov, O. V., Evseeva, D. G., Gromov, A. D. and Platonova, D. P. (2017). Evaluation of the contribution of regional higher education systems to the socio-economic development of Russian regions. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 30 p. (In Russian.)

Makarov, V., Ayvazyan, S., Afanasiev, M., Bakhtizin, A. and Nanavyan, A. (2016). Modeling the development of the region’s economy and the effectiveness of innovation space. Foresight, 3, 76–90. (In Russian.)

Meissner, D. (2012). Economic effects of «Flow» of the results of scientific and technical and innovation activities. Foresight, 4, 20–31. (In Russian.)

Mikheeva, N. N. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Innovative Systems of Russian Regions. Spatial Economics, 4, 61–81. (In Russian.)

Monastyrnyi, E. A. and Uvarov, A. F (2011). Applicability of the model of interaction between universities, business and the state as an instrument for the development of the modern Russian economy. Innovations, 4, 56–65. (In Russian.)

Public report on the results of a sociological survey of behavioral and institutional prerequisites for technological development in the regions of the Russian Federation (2016) (http://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/0e8/attitudes_to_technologies_and_innovations_in_Russia.pdf – Accessed on June 12 2017). (In Russian.)

Rumyantsev, A. A. (2013). Basic properties and problem fields of the scientific and innovative space of the region. Spatial Economics, 2, 103–118. (In Russian.)

Sanderson, A. and Benneworth, P. (2012). Participation of universities in regional development: capacity building in conditions of a low-innovation environment. Bulletin of International Organizations, 7(1), 172–188. (In Russian.)

Smorodinskaya, N. (2011). Triple Helix as a new matrix of economic systems. Innovations, 4, 66–78. (In Russian.)

Sosunova, L. A. and Serper, E. A. (2010). Scientific knowledge as a source of innovative development of the economy. Economcheskie nauki, 7, 67–70. (In Russian.)

Volchik, V. V. and Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, D. D. (2013). Institutional conditions for innovative development of the Russian economy. Terra Economicus, 11(4‒3), 18–26. (In Russian.)

Volchik, V. V., Zhuk, A. A. and Korytsev, M. A. (2017). Competitive environment of the higher education market of the Rostov region. Terra Economicus, 15(3), 178–196. (In Russian.)

Zemtsov, S., Barinova, V., Pankratov, A. and Kutsenko, E. S. (2016a). Prospective hightech clusters in the Russian regions: from current policies to new growth points. Foresight, 3, 34–52. (In Russian.)

Zemtsov, S., Muradov, A., Wade, I. and Barinova, V. (2016b). Factors of innovation activity in Russian regions: what is more important – a person or capital? Foresight, 2, 29–42. (In Russian.)

Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606