SFeDu

Sieber and Vorontsov on the capitalist path of development of Russia

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 14 (no. 4),

This article examines the economic views of Russian economist Nikolai Ivanovich Sieber. His name thoroughly forgotten and little is found in scientific articles devoted to Russian economists of the nineteenth century. I think that the main reason for this neglect lies in his dedication to Marxist economic theory, the study of which is currently paid little attention by researchers-economists. Sieber is, in fact, the first Russian economist, who was able to understand Marx’s theory in all its complexity and dialectical interrelatedness. In addition, he thoroughly studied the scientific views of the predecessors of Marx, allowing him to understand the ideological unity of Marxism and classical political economy. However, in this article, the main attention is paid to the question of polemics N.I. Sieber with the populists, in particular with V.P. Vorontsov regarding what should be the way of development of economy of Russia. The essence of the dispute was whether the country to develop, on the basis of objective laws of development, those on the capitalist path, or Russia has its own special path of development. Vorontsov and the populists were supporters of non-capitalist development of the country. They believed that in a predominantly agrarian country, which was Russia, there are no necessary prerequisites for capitalist development. Populists fought for the preservation of peasant communities, cooperatives and spoke against creation of large-scale capitalist production in Russia. Sieber denied populist conception about the special way of development of Russia, and defended the Marxist idea that capitalism is an objective stage of development of society and thus is inevitable.


Keywords: Sieber, N.; Vorontsov, V.; Marxism; populism; the development of capitalism; the community; the artel

References:
  • Blagikh I. and Dubyanskiy A. (2014). History of economic doctrines: the textbook for academic bachelor degree. Moscow: Urait Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Dubyanskiy A. (2011). Russian economists of the late XIX – early XX century on the influence of the peasant reform of 1861 on the development of agriculture of Russia. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Series 5. Economy, no. 2, pp. 18–27. (In Russian.)
  • Gerschenkron A. (2015). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Moscow: Publishing house «Delo». (In Russian.)
  • Kleinbort L.M. (1923). Nikolai Ivanovich Sieber. Petrograd: Kolos Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Kravchenko A.I. (2008). The Tragic path of Russian capitalism / In: Vorontsov V.P. Economics and capitalism. Moscow: Astrel Publ., pp. 3–50. (In Russian.)
  • Levitsky V.F. (1907). On the solution of the agrarian question. Agrarian question, vol. 2. Moscow: Beseda Publ., pp. 237–258. (In Russian.)
  • Marx K. (1955). Capital / In: Marx K. and Engels F. Works, vol. 23. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russian.)
  • Mikhailovsky N. (1897). Works, vol. 4. SPb.: Typo-Lithography by B.M. Wolf. (In Russian.)
  • Naumov D.B. (1930). Nikolai Ivanovich Sieber. From the history of Marxist economic thought in Ukraine and in Russia. Kharkov: Proletariat Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Ovsyaniko-Kulikovsky D.N. (1923). Memories. Petrograd. (In Russian.)
  • Pipes R. (1993). The Russian revolution. USA: economy, politics, ideology, no. 6. (In Russian.)
  • Podol R.J. (2010). Historical-economic views of Russian Marxists of the late XIX – early XX centuries. Bulletin of Moscow regional state University, no. 1, pp. 72–81. (In Russian.)
  • Raskov D.E. (1997). V.P. Vorontsov about the economic development of Russia. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Series 5. Economy, no. 3. pp. 108–115. (In Russian.)
  • Reuel A.L. (1956). Russian economic thought in 69–70-ies of the XIX century and Marxism. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoi literatury. (In Russian.)
  • Ryazanov V.T. (2015). The Economic model of the Russian populists and the Russian path in the economy. Christian reading, no. 1, pp. 162–180. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber N. (1881). History of the Swiss almende. Vestnik Evropy, no. 9, pp. 601–632. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber N. (1882a). The fate of communal ownership in Switzerland. Vestnik Evropy, no. 7, pp. 41–73. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber N. (1882b). The factory law in Russia. Volnoe slovo, no. 42. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber N. (1900). German economists through his glasses G.B. Chicherin / In: Works, vol. 2, SPb.: Izdatel Publ., pp. 610–717. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber. N. (1959). David Ricardo and Karl Marx in their socio-economic studies / In: Sieber N. Selected economic papers, in 2 vols. Moscow, pp. 31–551. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber N. (2012a). The history of the Russian community / In: Economic objection to the doctrine of John Stuart Mill; Capitalism in Russia. Moscow: Book house «LIBROKOM», pp. 209–223. (In Russian.)
  • Sieber N. (2012b). Capitalism in Russia / In: Economic Objection to the doctrine of John Stuart mill; Capitalism in Russia. M.: Book house «LIBROKOM», pp. 193–205. (In Russian.)
  • Sokolovskiy A.P. (1878). The economic life of the agricultural population of Russia and the colonization of the South-Eastern steppes in front of serfdom. SPb.: Typography of F.S. Sushchinskii. (In Russian.)
  • Stepanov V.L. (1998). N. Bunge: the fate of the reformer. Moscow: «Russian political encyclopedia» Publ. (ROSSPEN). (In Russian.)
  • Struve P.B. (2015). Critical notes on the economic development of Russia. Moscow: LENAND Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Tsagolov N. (1953). Characteristics of the economic views of N. Sieber. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 9, pp. 78–91. (In Russian.)
  • Tugan-Baranovsky M. (1907). Russian factory in past and present: vol. 1, Historical development of Russian factory in the XIX century. SPb.: Publishing of the bookshop «Nasha zhizn». (In Russian.)
  • Vorontsov V.P. (2008). The Fate of capitalism in Russia / In: Vorontsov V.P. Economy and capitalism. Moscow: Astrel Publ., pp. 51–336. (In Russian.)
  • Zapolska V. (1955). Economic views of N. Sieber and his place in the history of Russian economic thought / Abstract of the dissertation .... Cand. In Economics: 08.00.01. Moscow. (In Russian.)
  • Zweynert J. (2008). History of economic thought in Russia. 1805–1905. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (In Russian.)
  • Guelfat I. (1970). Aux sources de la marxologie authentique: N.I. Ziber. L’homme et la société, no. 17, pp. 141–148.
  • Kappeler A. (1989). N.I. Ziber – Мiкола Зiбер – Niclaus Sieber Primi sobran’e pёstrych: Slavistishe und slavenkundliche Beiträge für Peter Brang zum 65. Geburtstag / hrsg. von Carsten Goehrke. Bern; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Paris, pp. 671–683.
  • Scazzieri R. (1987). Ziber on Ricardo. Contributions to Political Economy, no. 6, pp. 25–44.
  • White J. (2001). Nikolai Sieber and Karl Marx / In: Marx‘s Capital and Capitalism: Markets in a Socialist Alternative, Research in Political Economy, vol. 19, pp. 3–16.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606