• Home
  • Issues
  • 2016
  • No 2
  • Search for the new ideas of russian economic development from the perspective of the theory of passionarity


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 14 (no. 2),

Moscow Economic Forum (MEF-2016, end of March, 2016) had discussion on the intriguing theme of search for new ideas of development of the Russian economy, with the national idea as the main focus. Such orientation of scientific search makes it reasonable to turn to cognitive potential of Lev Gumilev’s theory of passionarity. Its potential is being developed in many directions of modern social science. Application of method of the theory of passionarity shows its relevance for the Russian economic science, in particular, for the process of collective search for new ideas which could help to renovate the archaic structure of Russian economy. The author justifies legitimacy, relevance and necessity of application of methodological tools of the theory of passionarity for the analysis of creative potential of the Russian ethnos at the current life cycle phase. Application of these tools can provide efficiency of search for the new ideas of Russian economic development, and result in a denial of various clichés which may mislead the scientific search. At the same time, today such application is limited because of the methodological abilities of research participants, due to decline in politicaleconomy level of analytical culture. Special attention is paid by the author to the interdisciplinary character of search for the new ideas of Russian economic development, with the emphasis on complex approach, involving: context analysis, detailed historical description of the economic system, clearness of the research in terms of its object, conceptual integrity, effective combining of strengths of different scientific approaches, as well as assessment of feasibility of the new developmental ideas. The author seeks the real assessment of potential of development that the Russian ethnos possesses at the inertia phase of its life cycle.

Keywords: new idea; passionarity; economic methodology; development; etnos

  • Arrighi G. (2006). Long twentieth century. Money, power and sources of our time. Мoscow: Territoriya budushchego Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Ermolenkо А.А. (2015). “Toughness” of economic policy in absence of political economy. The Issues of Political Economy, no. 3. (In Russian.)
  • Gogol N.V. (1997). Dead souls. Мoscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Gumilev L.N. (2013). String of history. Lectures on ethnology. Moscow: Ayris-Press. (In Russian.)
  • Gumilev L.N. (2015). The end and again the beginning: Popular lectures on ethnography. Moscow: Ayris-Press. (In Russian.)
  • Kholodkov V.G. (2015). Reasons of crisis economic development of Russia. The Issues of Political Economy, no. 3, pp. 89–98. (In Russian.)
  • Mамеdоv О.Yu. (2016). Searching for the «non-economic» production. Terra Economicus, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 6–17. (In Russian.)
  • Nureev R.М. and Latov Yu.V. (2016). Economic history of Russia (experience of institutional analysis). Moscow: КNORUS Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Ovchinnikov V.N. and Коlеsniкоv Yu.S. (2008). Shape of the regional economic policy in the South of Russia. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Vеrnadskiy V.I. (1981). Selected works on the history of science. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Zweig S. (1992). Marie Antoinette: The Portrait of an Average Woman / In: Collection of works in ten volumes, vol. 7. Moscow: Terra Publ. (In Russian.)
  • Albertazzi D. and McDonnell D. (eds.) (2008). Twenty-First Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hill F. and Gaddy C. (2003). The Siberian curse: How Communist Planners Left Russia Out in the Cold. Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press.
  • Maddison A. (2001). The World Economy: a Millenial Perspective. OECD.
  • New Economy Allocation (undated). What is the New Economy? New Economy Coalition (http://neweconomy.net/about/what-is-the-new-economy).
  • Oleinik A.N. (ed.) (2005). The Institutional Economics of Russia’s Transformation. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Olson M. (1993). Why is Economic Performance Even Worse after Communism is Abandoned? Virginia: Fairfax.
  • Popov V. (2014). Mixed Fortunes. An Economic History of China, Russia, and the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rifkin J. (2000). The Age of Access. The New Culture of Hypercapitalism where All of Life is a Paid-For Experience. N.Y.: Putnam.
  • Stirling А. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science, no. 1, pp. 83–95.
  • Walliser B. (2008). Cognitive Economics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606