SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2025
  • No 1
  • Institutional transformations of Russian local self-government: Lessons for sustainable economic development of the region

Institutional transformations of Russian local self-government: Lessons for sustainable economic development of the region


TERRA ECONOMICUS, Vol. 23, No 1,

Citation: Strielkowski W., Kalyugina S., Mukhoryanova O., Fursov V. (2025). Institutional transformations of Russian local self-government: Lessons for sustainable economic development of the region. Terra Economicus 23(1), 93–102. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2025-23-1-93-102

Acknowledgment: The paper was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 23-28-10154, https://rscf.ru/ project/23-28-10154/

Our paper analyzes the outcomes of the institutional transformations of local self-government (public authority) in the Russian Federation with a special focus on regional sustainable economic development. Under the current ongoing pilot reform of the selected territorial organizations of local self-governments that envisages the transition to a single-level model, the social and economic development of Russian municipalities is undergoing profound changes that would have deep institutional implications for the entire regional economic systems. One of the selected pilot regions for these reforms is the Stavropol Region of Russia. In the empirical part of the paper, we are presenting the results of the survey that was conducted between November and December 2023 among local residents and stakeholders of the Stavropol Region by the researchers from the Institute of Economics and Management of the North-Caucasus Federal University and the representatives of the Association “Council of Municipalities of the Stavropol Territory”. Our sample included 858 respondents aged from 15 to 82. Our results demonstrate that the perceived impact of the administrative reform varies significantly across age groups, place of residence, and settlement sizes. Residents of medium or smaller settlements and towns, as well as respondents aged between 36 and 60 proved to be more likely to perceive positive changes induced by the administrative institutional reforms. These results are of a special relevance for the state and municipal stakeholders and policymakers as well as for the local residents who are keen on promoting regional sustainable economic development and growth.


Keywords: sustainable development; public administration; institutional economics; Russia
JEL codes: B25, B52, H83, Q01


References:
Burkhardt, F. (2021). Institutionalising authoritarian presidencies: Polymorphous power and Russia’s presidential administration. Europe-Asia Studies 73(3), 472–504. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1749566
Chernyavsky, A., & Vartapetov, K. (2004). Municipal finance reform and local self-governance in Russia. Post-Communist Economies 16(3), 251–264. DOI: 10.1080/1463137042000257500
Coase, R. (1959). The federal communications commission. The Journal of Law and Economics 2, 1–40. DOI: 10.1086/466549
Coase, R. (2013). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics 56(4), 837–877. DOI: 10.1086/674872
David, P. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75(2), 332–337.
David, P. (2019). Historical economics in the longrun: Some implications of path-dependence. In: Snooks, G. (ed.). Historical Analysis in Economics. New York: Routledge, pp. 29–40.
Foa, R. (2022). Decentralization, historical state capacity and public goods provision in Post-Soviet Russia. World Development 152, 105807. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105807
Gudde, P., Bury, N., Cochrane, P., Caldwell, N. (2024). Developing a toolkit to help smaller local authorities establish strong net zero governance in the UK. Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy, 3, 1390570. DOI: 10.3389/fsuep.2024.1390570
Haque, A., Salehin, M., Ferdous, J., Billah, M., Aminur, S. (2021). Standing committees’ responses in promoting peace, justice and strong institution (SDG 16) at local level in Bangladesh. Planning 16(5), 811–817. DOI: 10.18280/ijsdp.160502
Hope, K. (2020). Peace, justice and inclusive institutions: Overcoming challenges to the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16. Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(1), 57– 77. DOI: 10.1080/14781158.2019.1667320
Kalyugina, S., Mukhoryanova, O., Fursov, V. (2024). Assessment of asymmetry of socio-economic development of municipalities at the regional level. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika (Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics) 26(1), 31–44. DOI: 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2024.1.3
Minaeva, E., Rumiantseva, A., Zavadskaya, M. (2023). From local elections to appointments: How has municipal reform changed vote delivery in Russian municipalities? Electoral Studies 85, 102657. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102657
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
North, D. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review 84(3), 359–368.
North, D. (2016). Institutions and economic theory. The American Economist 61(1), 72–76. DOI: 10.1177/0569434516630194
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Polishchuk, L., Rubin, A., Shagalov, I. (2021). Managing collective action: government-sponsored community initiatives in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 73(6), 1176–1209. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1935466
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). Institutions and the fortunes of territories. Regional Science Policy & Practice 12(3), 371–386. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12277
Ross, C. (2007). The tortuous path of local government reform in the Russian Federation. In: Coulson, A., Campbell, A. (eds.). Local Government in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 105–124.
Strielkowski, W., Popov, E. (2017). Economic modelling in institutional economic theory. Journal of Institutional Studies 9(2), 18–28. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.2.018-028
Strielkowski, W., Volchik, V., Maskaev, A., Savko, P. (2020). Leadership and effective institutional economics design in the context of education reforms. Economies 8(2), 27. DOI: 10.3390/ economies8020027
Volchik, V. (2020). Narratives and understanding of economic institutions. Terra Economicus 18(2), 49–69. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-49-69
Volchik, V., Maslyukova, E. (2021). Narrative Economics perspective on modeling national innovation system. Terra Economicus 19(4), 36–50. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-4-36-50
Zakshevskaya, E., Sabetova, T., Chernykh, A., Zagvozkin, M. (2020). Key directions of national social policy in the Russian Federation: Creation of efficient governmental social policy and its implementation. In: International Conference on Policies and Economics Measures for Agricultural Development (AgroDevEco 2020). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press, pp. 436–444. DOI: 10.2991/ aebmr.k.200729.082
Zhestyannikov, S. G. (2022). Priorities and tools for the transformation of municipal governance in the context of the new reform of local self-government. Economic And Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(4), 88-101. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.6

Publisher: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606