ЮФУ
ул. М. Горького, 88, к. 211
г.Ростов-на-Дону, Россия
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.
Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.

TERRA ECONOMICUS

Устойчивое организационное развитие и человеческий капитал в контексте методологии мягких систем


TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Том 22 (номер 1),
Цитирование: Strielkowski W., Kuzmin E., Suvorova A., Gorlova O. (2024). Sustainable organizational development and human capital in the context of soft systems methodology. Terra Economicus22(1), 137–150. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-1-137-150
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено при поддержке гранта Российского научного фонда № 23-28-01768.

В настоящее время, когда мир сталкивается с серьезными проблемами, связанными с изменением климата и геополитическими препятствиями, методология мягких систем (ММС) и учет институциональных факторов способны помочь в достижении целей устойчивого развития и поэтому приобретают все большую популярность в исследовательской литературе. Сочетая принципы ММС с положениями институциональной экономики, ученые и лица, принимающие решения, могут ориентироваться в реальных проблемах и разрабатывать эффективные стратегии для их решения. Понимание сложной взаимосвязи между ММС и институциональной экономикой содействует формированию исследовательского подхода для изучения способов повышения эффективности и устойчивости организации в плане технических и социальноэкономических аспектов. В эмпирической части работы мы представляем результаты библиометрического анализа 76 источников, проиндексированных в базе данных Web of Science (WoS) в период с 1995 по 2023 гг. Кластерный анализ проведен с помощью программы VOSViewer. Результаты показывают, что по мере роста устойчивости экономических и социальных процессов фокус внимания исследователей возвращается к ММС и институциональной экономике. Основными темами являются эффективность и устойчивость организаций, а также человеческий капитал в контексте устойчивого развития.


Ключевые слова: методология мягких систем; институциональная экономика; устойчивое развитие; человеческий капитал; библиометрия; сетевой кластерный анализ

Список литературы:
  • Altman, M. (2023). Mental models, decision-making, bargaining power, and institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues 57(4), 1241–1259. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2023.2273149
  • Banerjee, S., Jermier, J., Peredo, A., Perey, R., Reichel, A. (2021). Theoretical perspectives on organizations and organizing in a post-growth era. Organization 28(3), 337–357. DOI: 10.1177/1350508420973629
  • Bocken, N., & Konietzko, J. (2022). Circular business model innovation in consumer-facing corporations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 185, 122076. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122076
  • Chan, C. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
  • Checkland, P. (2010). Researching real-life: Reflections on 30 years of action research. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27(2), 129–133. DOI: 10.1002/sres.1019
  • Checkland, P., Poulter, J. (2020). Soft systems methodology. In: Reynolds, M., Holwell, S. (eds.) Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide. London: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_5
  • Coase, R. (1959). The federal communications commission. The Journal of Law and Economics 2, 1–40. DOI: 10.1086/466549
  • Coase, R. (2013). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics 56(4), 837–877. DOI: 10.1086/674872
  • Cradock-Henry, N., Connolly, J., Blackett, P., Lawrence, J. (2020). Elaborating a systems methodology for cascading climate change impacts and implications. MethodsX 7, 100893. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100893
  • Dahesh, M., Tabarsa, G., Zandieh, M., Hamidizadeh, M. (2020). Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis. Technology in Society 63, 101399. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101399
  • D’Amore, G., Di Vaio, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Boccia, F. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the waterenergy-food model: a holistic approach towards sustainable development goals. Sustainability 14(2), 867. DOI: 10.3390/su14020867
  • Dumitriu, D., Militaru, G., Deselnicu, D., Niculescu, A., Popescu, M. (2019). A perspective over modern SMEs: Managing brand equity, growth and sustainability through digital marketing tools and techniques. Sustainability 11(7), 2111. DOI: 10.3390/su11072111
  • Ercantan, O., Eyupoglu, S. (2022). How do green human resource management practices encourage employees to engage in green behavior? Perceptions of university students as prospective employees. Sustainability, 14(3), 1718. DOI: 10.3390/su14031718
  • Eweje, G., Sajjad, A., Nath, S., Kobayashi, K. (2021). Multi-stakeholder partnerships: A catalyst to achieve sustainable development goals. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(2), 186-212. DOI: 10.1108/MIP-04-2020-0135
  • Faller, P., Lundgren, H., Marsick, V. (2020). Overview: why and how does reflection matter in workplace learning? Advances in Developing Human Resources 22(3), 248–263. DOI: 10.1177/1523422320927295
  • Garg, S., Sinha, S., Kar, A., Mani, M. (2022). A review of machine learning applications in human resource management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 71(5), 1590–1610. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0427
  • Grewatsch, S., Kennedy, S., Bansal, P. (2023). Tackling wicked problems in strategic management with systems thinking. Strategic Organization 21(3), 721–732. DOI: 10.1177/14761270211038635
  • He, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Zuo, J., Wu, G., Liu, B. (2020). To be green or not to be: How environmental regulations shape contractor greenwashing behaviors in construction projects. Sustainable Cities and Society 63, 102462. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102462
  • Hegab, H., Khanna, N., Monib, N., Salem, A. (2023). Design for sustainable additive manufacturing: A review. Sustainable Materials and Technologies e00576. DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00576
  • Hodgson, G. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1), 166–192
  • Jackson, M. (2023). Critical systems practice 4: Check-Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 40(4), 617–632. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2912
  • Kineber, A., Antwi-Afari, M., Elghaish, F., Zamil, A., Alhusban, M., Qaralleh, T. (2023). Benefits of implementing occupational health and safety management systems for the sustainable construction industry: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 15(17), 12697. DOI: 10.3390/su151712697
  • Kish, K., Mallery, D., Haage, G., Melgar-Melgar, R., Burke, M., Orr, C., Larson, J. (2021). Fostering critical pluralism with systems theory, methods, and heuristics. Ecological Economics 189, 107171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107171
  • Lamé, G., Jouini, O., Stal-Le Cardinal, J. (2020). Combining soft systems methodology, ethnographic observation, and discrete-event simulation: A case study in cancer care. Journal of the Operational Research Society 71(10), 1545–1562. DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1610339
  • Li, Z., She, J., Guo, Z., Du, J., Zhou, Y. (2024). An evaluation of factors influencing the community emergency management under compounding risks perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 100, 104179. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104179
  • Lin, C., Wittmer, J., Luo, X. (2022). Cultivating proactive information security behavior and individual creativity: The role of human relations culture and IT use governance. Information & Management 59(6), 103650. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103650
  • Lohman, L. (2020). Using soft systems thinking to craft instructional design and technology interventions. TechTrends 64(5), 720–729. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-020-00536-x
  • Martin, A., O’Meara, P. (2020). Community paramedicine through multiple stakeholder lenses using a modified soft systems methodology. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 17, 1–11. DOI: 10.33151/ajp.17.793
  • Martín, E., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., Van Der Keur, P., Costa, M. (2020). Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals. Science of the Total Environment 738, 139693. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693
  • Mayhew, A. (2018). An introduction to institutional economics: Tools for understanding evolving economies. The American Economist 63(1), 3–17. DOI: 10.1177/0569434517749157
  • Ménard, C., Shirley, M. (2014). The future of new institutional economics: from early intuitions to a new paradigm? Journal of Institutional Economics 10(4), 541–565. DOI: 10.1017/S174413741400006X
  • Murphy, K. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal 30(1), 13–31. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12259
  • Nicolini, D., Pyrko, I., Omidvar, O., Spanellis, A. (2022). Understanding communities of practice: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals 16(2), 680–718. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2020.0330
  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • North, D. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review 84(3), 359–368.
  • North, D. (2016). Institutions and economic theory. The American Economist 61(1), 72–76. DOI: 10.1177/0569434516630194
  • Ormerod, R., Yearworth, M., White, L. (2023). Understanding participant actions in OR interventions using practice theories: A research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research 306(2), 810–827. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.030
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Otenyo, E., Lind, N., Jones, L. (eds.) (2006). Comparative Public Administration: The Essential Readings. London: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Petracca, E., Gallagher, S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics 16(6), 747–765. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137420000144
  • Pham, N., Hoang, H., Phan, Q. (2020). Green human resource management: a comprehensive review and future research agenda. International Journal of Manpower 41(7), 845–878. DOI: 10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0350
  • Rai, S., Rai, S., Singh, N. (2021). Organizational resilience and social-economic sustainability: COVID-19 perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23, 12006–12023. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01154-6
  • Rana, G., Sharma, R. (2019). Emerging human resource management practices in Industry 4.0. Strategic HR Review 18(4), 176–181. DOI: 10.1108/SHR-01-2019-0003
  • Reddy, V., Chiranjeevi, T., Syme, G. (2020). Inclusive sustainable intensification of agriculture in West Bengal, India: Policy and institutional approaches. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 18(1), 70–83. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2019.1698489
  • Ren, S., Jackson, S. (2020). HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations. Human Resource Management Review 30(3), 100691. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691
  • Ribeiro, N., Nguyen, T., Duarte, A., de Oliveira, R., Faustino, C. (2020). How managerial coaching promotes employees’ affective commitment and individual performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 70(8), 2163–2181. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0373
  • Salavati, S., Mirijamdotter, A., Elm, P., Perez, M. (2021). Coordinated SSM: An adaptation of the SSM learning cycle. Systems 9(3), 49. DOI: 10.3390/systems9030049
  • Silalahi, M., Walsh, S. (2023). Analyzing government policies in addressing unemployment and empowering workers: Implications for economic stability and social welfare. Law and Economics 17(2), 92–110. DOI: 10.35335/laweco.v17i2.3
  • Singh, S., Singh, S., Koohang, A., Sharma, A., Dhir, S. (2023). Soft computing in business: exploring current research and outlining future research directions. Industrial Management & Data Systems 123(8), 2079–2127. DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-02-2023-0126
  • Slattery, O., Trubetskaya, A., Moore, S., McDermott, O. (2022). A review of lean methodology application and its integration in medical device new product introduction processes. Processes 10(10), 2005. DOI: 10.3390/pr10102005
  • Strielkowski, W., Popov, E. (2017). Economic modelling in institutional economic theory. Journal of Institutional Studies 9(2), 18–28. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.2.018-028
  • Strielkowski, W., Kuzmin, E., Suvorova, A., Nikitina, N., Gorlova, O. (2023). Organizational economic sustainability via process optimization and human capital: A soft systems methodology (SSM) approach. arXiv preprint, 2311.17882. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.17882
  • Strielkowski, W., Samoilikova, A., Smutka, L., Civín, L., Lieonov, S. (2022). Dominant trends in intersectoral research on funding innovation in business companies: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7(4), 100271. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100271
  • Vahdat, S. (2022). The role of IT-based technologies on the management of human resources in the COVID-19 era. Kybernetes 51(6), 2065–2088. DOI: 10.1108/K-04-2021-0333
  • Venter, C. (2020). A reflection on SSM as a critical social action research method: Towards improvement of project governance. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 18(2), 142–152. DOI: 10.34190/JBRM.18.2.006
  • Volchik, V. (2020). Narratives and understanding of economic institutions. Terra Economicus 18(2), 49–69. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-49-69
  • Volchik, V., Maslyukova, E. (2021). Narrative Economics perspective on modeling national innovation system. Terra Economicus 19(4), 36–50. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-4-36-50
  • Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., Trichina, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: A systematic review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 33(6), 1237–1266. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398
  • Wang, S., Abbas, J., Sial, M., Álvarez-Otero, S., Cioca, L. (2022). Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture. Journal of innovation & knowledge 7(4), 100272. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100272
  • Warren, S., Sauser, B., Nowicki, D. (2019). A bibliographic and visual exploration of the historic impact of soft systems methodology on academic research and theory. Systems 7(1), 10. DOI: 10.3390/systems7010010
  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press.
  • Williamson, O. (2005). The economics of governance. American Economic Review 95(2), 1–18. DOI: 10.1257/000282805774669880
  • Wu, C., Tang, Y., Tsang, Y., Chau, K. (2021). Immersive learning design for technology education: A soft systems methodology. Frontiers in Psychology 12, 745295. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745295
  • Xu, L. (2020). The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 37(4), 618–631. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2705
Издатель: Южный Федеральный Университет
Учредитель: Южный федеральный университет
ISSN: 2073-6606