SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

  • Home
  • Issues
  • 2018
  • No 1
  • Uncertainty in a transitional economy: the case of the czech republic in the 1990s

UNCERTAINTY IN A TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY: THE CASE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN THE 1990S

TERRA ECONOMICUS, , Vol. 16 (no. 1),

The paper is concerned with the role of uncertainty in an economy undergoing an economic transition. We aim especially at the uncertainty of the Keynesian type. First, a framework for classifying different views on uncertainty is constructed based on literature dedicated to various types of uncertainty. We define risk, as it is commonly adopted in the mainstream economics and uncertainty, outlined by Knight and Keynes and worked up by the Post Keynesians, although for mainstream approach these two concepts are synonymous. This framework is subsequently applied on two cases of decision-making, which appeared during the transition process in the Czech Republic. We show that some important phenomena in Czechia in the 1990s took place under conditions of fundamental or ontological uncertainty. In particular, it was the voucher privatization and Tosovsky dilemma that fit the definition formulated before. Further, potential recommendations for economic policy emerging from the presence of uncertainty are outlined, and their aptness for the Czech transition process is evaluated. We demonstrate that certain outcomes could have been significantly better had the Czech government taken the aspect of uncertainty into account. Hence, we give real-life reasons for fundamental uncertainty being taken seriously and incorporated into economic theory or at least economic policy.


Keywords: Post Keynesian economics; uncertainty; risk; Czechia; economy in transition; institutions

References:

Arrow, K. J. (1951). Alternative approaches to the theory of choice in risk–taking situations // Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 404–437.

Czech National Bank (2017). Annual reports of Czech National Bank (https://www.cnb.cz/cs/o_cnb/hospodareni/vyrocni_zpravy/index.html (In Czech.)

Czech Statistical Bureau (2018). Results of Elections and Referendums (https://www.volby.cz/index_en.htm – accessed 22 Oct. 2017). (In Czech.)

Czech Television (2010). The 13th chamber of Valtr Komarek (http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/1186000189-13-komnata/210562210800027-13-komnata-valtra-komarka – accessed 22 Oct. 2017). (In Czech.)

Dědek, O. (2000). Příčiny a průběh měnových turbulencí v České republice v roce 1997 [Currency turbulence in 1997 in the Czech Republic] // Politická ekonomie, 6. (In Czech.)

Dequech, D. (2001). Bounded rationality, institutions, and uncertainty // Journal of economic issues, 35.4, 911–929.

Dow, S. C., Ghosh, D., and Ruziev, K. (2008). A stages approach to banking development in transition economies // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31.1, 3–33.

Dzarasov, R. S. (2011). Eichnerian megacorp and investment behaviour of Russian corporations // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 199–217.

Dzarasov, S. S. (2010). The Post Keynesian alternative for the Russian economy // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 33.1, 17–40.

Glickman, M. (2003). Uncertainty, pp. 366–370 / In: J. E. King (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Hodgson, G. M. (2011). The eclipse of the uncertainty concept in mainstream economics // Journal of Economic Issues, 45.1, 159–176.

In-Server (2013). The enterprises of the voucher privatization (https://www.in-server.cz/rubriky/nekotovane-akcie/spolecnosti-z-kuponove-privatizace/ – accessed on 22 Oct. 2017). (In Czech.)

Inventura devadesátek (2013). An Interview with Petr Pithart. The Stocktaking of the 90’s (http://www.i90.cz/pithart.html – accessed 22 Oct. 2017). (In Czech.)

Investia.cz (2011). The Average Salary (http://www.investia.cz/prumerna-mzda – accessed 22 Oct. 2017). (In Czech.)

Jehle, G. A., and Reny, P. J. (2011). Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Harlow, England; New York: Financial Times.

Ježek, T. (2007) Zrození ze zkumavky: svědectví o české privatizaci 1990–1997. Prostor.

Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopes-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunnelling // American Economic Review, 90, 22–27.

Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment // The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51.2, 209–223

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. New York: Kelley and Millman.

Kozul-Wright, R., and Rayment, P. (1997). The institutional hiatus in economies in transition and its policy consequences // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21.5, 641–661.

Lucas, R. E. (1977). Understanding business cycles // Carnegie–Rochester conference series on public policy, vol. 5. North Holland.

Marangos, J. (2002). A post Keynesian critique of privatization policies in transition economies // Journal of International Development, 14.5, 573–589.

Mas–Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory, vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.

Murrell, P. (1993). What is shock therapy? What did it do in Poland and Russia? // PostSoviet Affairs, 9(2), 111–140.

Rousseas, S. (1998). Post Keynesian monetary economics. London: Macmillan.

Švejnar, J. (1990). A framework for the economic transformation of Czechoslovakia // Eastern European Economics, 29.2, 5–28.

Triska, D. (1991). Privatization: Czechoslovakia // Eastern European Economics, 30.1, 22–27.

Tsang, S. (1996). Against ‘Big Bang’in economic transition: normative and positive arguments // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20.2, 183–193.

Žídek, L. (2006). Transformace české ekonomiky: 1989–2004. Nakladatelství CH Beck.

Žídek, L. (2016). Economic Transformation in Central Europe, 1989–2004. Budapest– New York: Central European University Press.

Publisher: Southern Federal University
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606